SideWinderX Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 camry ka nalang kung may budget nd tingnan mo torque nd hp nun :evil: Quote Link to comment
FukmiFukyu Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Definitely Honda accord....matipid sa gas at mas maporma pa....I used to have a 95 corolla SR5 it was okay at first pero nung nakita ko yung bagong 2002 accord...pinatrade in ko yung toyota ko agad. oo nga pala, magkano ba ang honda accord dyan sa pinas? Quote Link to comment
Van Wilder Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 Korek ka jan pardsssss... pero yun honda pioneered the technology? mali rin yata yun ah.. siguro, honda lang ang nag-advertise na ganun na ang technology.. dali pards.. alam mo yan eh.. dali, explain mo nga.. they did start the technology on the NSX way back 91 it was made famous on the civic EF9 from 88-91 which carries the b16 engine which was used also in the EG, EK chassis the other car companies followed soon...lots of car co.s have their own version of variable valve timing tech. MIVEC for mistus, ZETEC for fords, VARIOCAM for porsches aside from what pardonme has mentioned Quote Link to comment
bouncing_boy77 Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 honda! :mtc: Quote Link to comment
Guest ginny Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 they did start the technology on the NSX way back 91 ahm.. 91? Teka.. I'll ask my bf first.. hehehe.. Ang alam ko talaga, Nissan ang nauna (?), nwei if you can provide me a link na pwede kong mabasa, I would be thankful.. added knowledge yan for me.. .. pero sa tututs lang.. maka-Mitsubishi talaga ako eh.. hehehe.. Quote Link to comment
Dreamer Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 For a review of the latest cars in the Philippines you can go to this site:motioncars.com Motioncars rate the Toyota Camry at 3 stars while they rate the Honda Accord at 5. The other specs are also there. The Accord VTi-L costs PhP 1.22M while the Camry 2.0G costs PhP 1.23M. I do have my doubts about their ratings sometimes because it doesn't include fuel economy and total cost of ownership. Ginnie, Among the Japanese carmakers, I would consider Mitsubishi the worst. Their service is terrible! Quote Link to comment
TintedWindows Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 For the driver: The CamryFor the driven: The Accord For reliability: Toyota I'd choose the Camry. Performance vs. Value. Quote Link to comment
Guest ginny Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 Ginnie, Among the Japanese carmakers, I would consider Mitsubishi the worst. Their service is terrible! Aray.. 'tay tayo jan... Anong dealer yan.. anong dealer yan.. hehehe.. Back to the topic.. sorry po, OT.. Quote Link to comment
Guest ginny Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 For a review of the latest cars in the Philippines you can go to this site:motioncars.com Btw, survey din lang yata yan eh.. alam mo naman dito sa Pinas.. sikat ang honda kse prestige daw yan.. lammo naman tayo mahilig to keep up with the Joneses kuno.. pero sa Japan, kulelat ang honda no... La lang.. hindi naman ako galet sa honda ha.. wehehehe Quote Link to comment
krunchaway Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 medyo mabagal sa arangkada...pero pound per pound..im for camry!! Quote Link to comment
peeping_tom Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 i will go for the honda accord. stability and handling, the best in its class. Quote Link to comment
pardonme Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 ginny - pards, many toyed with the idea of variable valve lift timing nuon pero honda was the first to successfully implement and market it sumunod na lang yung iba including nissan Quote Link to comment
blackthunder Posted January 1, 2004 Share Posted January 1, 2004 Il go for the Camry, much stylist. pricewise, almost the same naman. Quote Link to comment
illuminati Posted January 1, 2004 Share Posted January 1, 2004 medyo mabagal sa arangkada...pero pound per pound..im for camry!! i second the motion...i think the best head-to-head shoot-out on these two mid-size cars can be found on a back-issue of C! Magazine (IMHO, the best and classiest local auto-mag in the market)...so feel free to check it out. The CAMRY is the largest mid-size car in the local market today.Outsizing the 2003 Accord and the 2003 Cefiro. (Note that Galant is the only local market midsize that is yet to release a new series/edition of their marquee).So for the Driven - Camry should actually be the better choice as it provides for larger legroom and S-classesque dimensions.Design wise it reminds many of a Japanese S-Class. The ACCORD has been completely redesigned, and features quite a lot of driver-reachable controls at hand. So actually, for the Driven - the Accord should be the smarter choice. Ditto with what Krunch said, the CAMRY - with its heftier size - accelerates slower, making it an ideal passenger car rather than a drivers car.Design wise (especially with the new tail), it reminds many of a Japanese Maseratti. The CEFIRO (especially the Brougham) has the best luxury features in its class though, including massagers built-in the rear passenger seats. All things considered - pound for pound - I'd go for the CAMRY. Happy Driving People! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.