Duterte's Presidency : Expectations, Controversies, Rants, Etc.

[rooster69ph]

i”i challenge to a debate” and “lets talk substance” daw ... nun. natanong question number one pa lang di makasagot ...”what you see is what you get.”. AYOS sa substance!

[Calvin Chua]

ii challenge to a debate and lets talk substance daw ... nun. natanong question number one pa lang di makasagot ...what you see is what you get.. AYOS sa substance!

"Mayaman ako bakit ko sabihin kung san ko tinago, mga gago kayo" - duterte

 

Mga uto uto: "napakasimple talga ng aming Tatay Digong natutulog lng sa kulambo at kumakain ng sardinas. Pati sapatos sira sira!"

 

Hanggat may mga uto uto, wala talagang mangyayaring pag unlad sa bayan

[camiar]

And again, if Du30 has poor economic management, how come Poverty Incidence has significantly gone down all across the nation from 2015 to 2018?

 

2015 vs 2018 Poverty Statistics.jpg

 

Light Blue and Light Green are 2015 figures

 

Dark Blue and Dark Green are 2018 figures.

 

The decrease in poverty are significant.

 

 

i”i challenge to a debate” and “lets talk substance” daw ... nun. natanong question number one pa lang di makasagot ...”what you see is what you get.”. AYOS sa substance!

 

 

OK. Let's talk substance.

 

Start by explaining the graph above.

 

Titiklop ka uli. I'm sure.

 

Mr. LaBayag

Edited April 12, 2019 by camiar

[Calvin Chua]

A piece of paper wouldnt justify the true state of the nation. Mas madaming drugs ngayon, mas madaming walang trabaho. Karamihan pa nga ibinibigay sa mha dayuhang Intsik. Traffic, MRT, walang plaka, mataas na bilihin, korapsyon.. ano pa ba nirereklamo nyo kay Pnoy nun na nasolusuyunan na ngayon? Unless you are a fanatic.

 

Piece of paper? Lol

[haroots2]

A piece of paper wouldnt justify the true state of the nation. Mas madaming drugs ngayon, mas madaming walang trabaho. Karamihan pa nga ibinibigay sa mha dayuhang Intsik. Traffic, MRT, walang plaka, mataas na bilihin, korapsyon.. ano pa ba nirereklamo nyo kay Pnoy nun na nasolusuyunan na ngayon? Unless you are a fanatic.

 

Piece of paper? Lol

 

And that's because you said so? Anong proof mo sa sinasabi mo eh puro ka lang rant dito. Para ka lang si R. Downey dati, or you are just the same

[camiar]

A piece of paper wouldnt justify the true state of the nation. Mas madaming drugs ngayon, mas madaming walang trabaho. Karamihan pa nga ibinibigay sa mha dayuhang Intsik. Traffic, MRT, walang plaka, mataas na bilihin, korapsyon.. ano pa ba nirereklamo nyo kay Pnoy nun na nasolusuyunan na ngayon? Unless you are a fanatic.

 

Piece of paper? Lol

Instead of ranting incoherently, try talking with some sense.

 

"Mas madaming drugs ngayon..." -- I don't see it anymore in my neighborhood in Makati. Most of the people around have the perception that the drug menace is still there, but the government is moving in the right direction in solving the problem. Please enlighten me where you're coming from.

 

"Mas madaming walang trabaho..." -- I saw a report before that the employment has improved. I'll look for that report. But in the meantime, can you show where you got the info that the unemployment and under-employment has deteriorated?

 

"MRT..." -- My observation is that the MRT are no longer breaking down left and right. The new coaches are now deployed. New maintenance contractor has already been selected. Has the MRT further deteriorated?

 

please make a point-by-point explanation on why we should believe your doomsday scenario.

Edited April 12, 2019 by camiar

[Calvin Chua]

"We are now a Narco State"

 

- President Rodrigo Duterte.

 

 

Pls debate with him. Lol

[rooster69ph]

OK. Let's talk substance.

 

Start by explaining the graph above.

 

Titiklop ka uli. I'm sure.

 

Mr. LaBayag

ano kamo? start by explaining the graph? lol you cannot only talk sense but also full of nonsense!

 

ganito lang yan ...nagpakita ka ng graph tinanong ka ni jopoc about it di mo masagot. sabi mo “ what you see is what you get”. in short di mo kayang makipagdebate sa nakikipagdebate sa iyo. and now you want me to explain it for you. hahaha...patawa kang pervert ka.

[will robie]

ano kamo? start by explaining the graph? lol you cannot only talk sense but also full of nonsense!

 

ganito lang yan ...nagpakita ka ng graph tinanong ka ni jopoc about it di mo masagot. sabi mo “ what you see is what you get”. in short di mo kayang makipagdebate sa nakikipagdebate sa iyo. and now you want me to explain it for you. hahaha...patawa kang pervert ka.

Instead of explaining the graph, the only reply you can come up with is this imbecilic ad hominem post which indicates that you are clueless about he graph. Why are you involving jopoc here when you were the one asked to explain the graph?

 

Say what? You cannot only talk sense but also full of nonsense? You're as incoherent as Robredo.

 

You could have just said "you're full of nonsense". You really can't express yourself well.

Edited April 12, 2019 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

Instead of explaining the graph, the only reply you can come up with is this imbecilic ad hominem post which indicates that you are clueless about he graph. Why are you involving jopoc here when you were the one asked to explain the graph?

 

Say what? You cannot only talk sense but also full of nonsense? You're as incoherent as Robredo.

 

You could have just said "you're full of nonsense". You really can't express yourself well.

 

oh the boytoy of the pervert to the rescue....

 

why am i involving Jopoc? well coz i am stating a fact. your pervert dom posted this graph and jopoc raised a question. for him to clarify.

 

so give me a good reason why i should now be burdened with the task of explaining and defending the graph that he (camiar) posted.

 

oh let me guess...parang ikaw lang yan puro ka satsat at pagproproject ang alam pero kapag nagkasubukan na eh ipapasa sa iba. magkauri nga kayo. hahaha

[will robie]

oh the boytoy of the pervert to the rescue....

 

Another conjecture which does not answer the question asked of you. Another proof of cluelessness.

why am i involving Jopoc? well coz i am stating a fact. your pervert dom posted this graph and jopoc raised a question. for him to clarify.

Another lame excuse. You were being asked a question and only posted when jopoc replied to the post of camiar. You never grow tired of being one of this section's resident dumbasses.

Edited April 13, 2019 by will robie

[will robie]

so give me a good reason why i should now be burdened with the task of explaining and defending the graph that he (camiar) posted.

You only posted, a nonsensical one at that without explaining the graph, when jopoc answered. In other words, salingpusa ka lang. It is apparent you are clueless on what was being asked. You are way too easy. Just too easy.

[will robie]

oh let me guess...parang ikaw lang yan puro ka satsat at pagproproject ang alam pero kapag nagkasubukan na eh ipapasa sa iba. magkauri nga kayo. hahaha

Haha! Ipapasa sa iba? Hahaha! I got a good laugh out of this post and the words in bold is what you just did. You can't answer the post and only became a "salingpusa" when jopoc replied. Haha! You are mortifying yourself too much.

[rooster69ph]

In other words, salingpusa ka lang.

 

so according to you nakisalingpusa lang ako sa usapan ni camiar at jopoc. as far as i know my post which you quoted is a direct response addressed to camiar after he quoted me. again like i said to him it is not my obligation to explain a graph which i did not present in the first place. it is the responsibility of the one who presented it.

 

but look at you any of your post related to the graph presented by your pervert sugar dad? trying to be a hero to the rescue by quoting my post? madadagdagan ba sustento sa iyo?

 

so lets talk sense... so kaya mong sagutin yun tanong ni Jopoc na di masagot ni camiar? sa tingin ko hindi. e nakailang post ka sa iisang post ko ... wala naman tumutumbok dun sa katanungan na lahat ba ng pagkakautang sa BBB ay naisama na sa pinapakitang debt to gdp. pero sige last chance hihintayin ko next post mo para sagutin ang tinatanong ni Jopoc.

 

otherwise, then ano ka naman na obviously nakisawsaw lang talaga sa usapan ni camiar at jopoc then ako at ni camiar ... one word...EPAL! a very much affected one at that. hahaha

[will robie]

so according to you nakisalingpusa lang ako sa usapan ni camiar at jopoc. as far as i know my post which you quoted is a direct response addressed to camiar after he quoted me. again like i said to him it is not my obligation to explain a graph which i did not present in the first place. it is the responsibility of the one who presented it.

 

You addressed it to camiar after jopoc answered. It does not change the fact that "salingpusa" ka lang.

but look at you any of your post related to the graph presented by your pervert sugar dad? trying to be a hero to the rescue by quoting my post? madadagdagan ba sustento sa iyo?

I never tried to be a "salingpusa". I am just stating a fact na "salingpusa" ka. Does the truth hurt?