Duterte's Presidency : Expectations, Controversies, Rants, Etc.

[tk421]

Backed up with sources yan, ewan ko how he will try to squirm out of that one...

[will robie]

 

oo sunog na sunog ako...kasi sabi mo

 

kay duterte mismo na nanggaling na lumala ang problema sa droga ...

 

speaking of stat ayan ang stat sinampal na sa mukha mo na tumataas ang bilang ng mga drug users.

 

effective nga dumbass interpretation

The number one article is a survey. The number two article is a flawed comparison. The number three article is an estimate. The number four article is belaboring the original the article that was posted. You and your imbecile of a troll wingman putatively did not read the four articles. Those did not contradict the latest figures PDEA gave. You're badly burned because you can't give sensible replies except "sampal mo na sa mukha mo na tumataas ang mga bilang ng mga drug users" which is a baseless and absolutely stupid reply just because Duterte said it when Duterte sometimes says something he does not mean. Maria Ressa was arrested for violating the anti-dummy law. There should be an anti-dumbass law for trolls like you.

Backed up with sources yan, ewan ko how he will try to squirm out of that one...

Sources which did not controvert what the latest figures of PDEA indicated. No need to wiggle my way out of anything because I was never cornered. You and your dumb wingman are the ones who are cornered. I don't expect either of you to contradict what I posted convincingly because all you clowns ever do is reply with shallow and incongruous posts.

Edited March 30, 2019 by will robie

[will robie]

 

 

http://nine.cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/11/10/Duterte-k

I bet when Duterte said this, tk41 and rooster69ph believed this story hook, line and sinker. Anything Duterte says, they'll believe. They can't analyze between fact and fiction.

[jopoc]

Duterte sometimes says things that he does not mean like what he said that the drug situation has worsened. Kung ganun, bakit ito ang sabi ng PDEA which is backed up by stats?

 

The troll who quoted me just got burned again. But then again, doesn't it always?

 

 

 

an admission that the president is a liar? or a clown? or both?

[will robie]

 

 

an admission that the president is a liar? or a clown? or both?

The key word is "sometimes". The way I see it, he just says it to piss off his critics. You can have your own interpretation.

Edited March 30, 2019 by will robie

[Calvin Chua]

Kawawa din yun mga solid supporters na nauto. Galit na galit noon. Galit n galit pa din hanggang ngayon. Di naman masisi ang Poon. Mapapahiya sa sarili. Hay, buhay DDS

[will robie]

Kawawa naman si DDS Fanatic. Nagiba na ng pangalan, galit pa din sa mga Duterte supporters.

[jopoc]

The key word is "sometimes". The way I see it, he just says it to piss off his critics. You can have your own interpretation.

 

 

you mean the president, just to piss off critics, is "SOMETIMES" a liar, a clown, or both?

Edited March 30, 2019 by jopoc

[rooster69ph]

stupidity at its best...this roach-brain tard thinks paramihan lang ng huli, ng operasyon ng napatay ang batayan ng matagumpay na kampanya ng problema sa droga.

 

ang akin simple lang yan ... ang batayan ng matagumpay na kampanya eh nasusukat sa pagbaba ng bilang ng drug users. halimbawa may 1m na user nakahuli and/or nakapatay ng 100k na user at bumaba sa 900k na kang bilang then matagumpay yun. pero kung ang bilang ay tumaas pa despite yun mga ginawa nila eh paano naging matagumpay yun?

 

Jopoc naman ... you are belaboring the obvious. di mo lang sinunog at tinosta...naabo pa! hahaha

[will robie]

 

 

you mean the president, just to piss off critics, is "SOMETIMES" a liar, a clown, or both?

I leave you to your own interpretation. As far as I am concerned, Duterte just does it to piss off his critics.

[will robie]

stupidity at its best...this roach-brain tard thinks paramihan lang ng huli, ng operasyon ng napatay ang batayan ng matagumpay na kampanya ng problema sa droga.

 

ang akin simple lang yan ... ang batayan ng matagumpay na kampanya eh nasusukat sa pagbaba ng bilang ng drug users. halimbawa may 1m na user nakahuli and/or nakapatay ng 100k na user at bumaba sa 900k na kang bilang then matagumpay yun. pero kung ang bilang ay tumaas pa despite yun mga ginawa nila eh paano naging matagumpay yun?

 

Jopoc naman ... you are belaboring the obvious. di mo lang sinunog at tinosta...naabo pa! hahaha

Do you have stats to back up what you said that the number of users increased or are you relying on Duterte's words? I bet you can't give stats to back up your conjecture. Why am I even asking this section's resident dumbass a question it can't answer?

 

How is jopoc belaboring the obvious when he was just asking me a question? Hahaha! The next time you copy a word I am posting, make sure you know what it is. This post shows why you're this section's resident dumbass. Haha!

 

As usual, you just got embarrassed again.

Edited March 30, 2019 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

Do you have stats to back up what you said that the number of users increased or are you relying on Duterte's words? I bet you can't give stats to back up your conjecture. Why am I even asking this section's resident dumbass a question it can't answer?

 

How is jopoc belaboring the obvious when he was just asking me a question? Hahaha! The next time you copy a word I am posting, make sure you know what it is. This post shows why you're this section's resident dumbass. Haha!

 

As usual, you just got embarrassed again.

 

sinampal na sa mukha mo yun stat ... PDEA na mismo nanggaling 4.7m daw sa bilang nila ang users. the same PDEA na sinasabi mo na successful ang drug campaign. sabog ka na naman at lumulutang na naman yan utak mo. wait may utak ka nga ba?

[will robie]

sinampal na sa mukha mo yun stat ... PDEA na mismo nanggaling 4.7m daw sa bilang nila ang users. the same PDEA na sinasabi mo na successful ang drug campaign. sabog ka na naman at lumulutang na naman yan utak mo. wait may utak ka nga ba?

Did you even read the article that you are referring to? That was in 2017. There was no estimate given in 2018 for you and your wingman to say that the drug problem worsened. Huwag excited sa pagsupalpal sa akin, troll. Think because that's something you have a hard time doing.

 

 

 

The Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) now estimates that there are 4.7 million drug personalities in the country, the highest figure cited by the administration since launching the drug war last July.

Take a look at the verb in bold. Estimate. Take note, estimate. Relative to this estimate, there was no comparison of estimates for 2017 vs 2018 given by Duterte for him to say that the drug problem has worsened. This is something you and your dumb troll wingman did not take into consideration since you're too excited debunking me which you can't and will never do. Carry on with being this section's resident dumbass.

Edited March 31, 2019 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

Did you even read the article that you are referring to? That was in 2017. The PDEA gave the latest figures in the drug war. The PDEA gave actual numbers of what they did.

 

 

Take a look at the verb in bold. Estimate. Take note, estimate. Relative to this estimate, there was no comparison of estimates for 2017 vs 2018 given by Duterte for him to say that the drug problem has worsened. This is something you and your dumb troll wingman did not take into consideration since you're too excited debunking me which you can't and will never do. Carry on with being this section's resident dumbass.

unfortunately for you PDEA claims that the said figure has basis and can’t be considered as dubious....abong abo ka na ...hirit pa more! hahaha

 

 

 

PDEA’s letter to the Times

Dear Editor:

This has reference to the column “Observer” authored by Mr. Yen Makabenta entitled “Fake statistics: PDEA’s contribution to the drug war,” which was published in the Manila Times on Tuesday, May 16, 2017.

 

The story has to do with the alleged “fake statistics” involving the country’s total number of drug dependents declared by the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) during the “#RealNumbersPH” Forum held on May 3, 2017 at Crowne Plaza Hotel in Ortigas, Quezon City. According to the column, PDEA’s figure, which states that an estimated 4.7 million Filipinos are currently using illegal drugs, was aptly modified to concur with the earlier pronouncements to the public of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte.

 

In behalf of the Director General of PDEA, please allow me to put the record straight. First of all, the cited datum was constructed based on facts and exact science and that alone is by no means dubious.

[will robie]

unfortunately for you PDEA claims that the said figure has basis and can’t be considered as dubious....abong abo ka na ...hirit pa more! hahaha

So stating that it is an estimate is being burned? Haha! Hindi naman masama mangarap, troll. The fact is the DDB said that to have a perfect absolute figure is to get a census.

 

 

DDB chairman Benjamin Reyes said the discrepancies are valid because of different bases.

“The only way to get a perfect absolute figure is to get a census. In the absence of which, estimates, like surveys and intelligence figures, are good enough baselines to set objectives,” he said.

Of course, your retort to this would be the statement in bold but it is "good enough" , not perfect. So that is merely an estimate. However, the DDB has a lower figure. Before veering away from the argument, the crux of our argument was about Duterte's statement of the worsening drug problem. Where are the stats for 2018? Don't tell me to prove it because you were gullible to believe Duterte's statement. Duterte never showed a comparison of 2017 vs 2018 so your argument just went down the gutter. Huwag kang mangopya ng linya na sunog ako kasi ikaw lang itong nagsasabi na sunog ako when all you have is Duterte's unsubstantiated statement. Carry on in being this section's resident dumbass.

 

I will attack you on the comparison estimates to back up your claim that the drug problem worsened which you will veer away from because you don't have the stats to back it up. I get the feeling you will concentrate on the 2017 estimate which is really irrelevant because that was almost two years ago unless you make a comparison. Game, troll.

Edited March 31, 2019 by will robie