Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Duterte's Presidency : Expectations, Controversies, Rants, Etc.


Recommended Posts

China president Xi telling Duterte he won’t let him get ousted.

 

A foreign government vowing to interfere in our political system. I’ll leave it at that.

 

Pero syempre may isa dyan sasabihin “eh kung US ang nagsabi nyan kay ***, ok lang sa iyo?”.

 

Kung ganyan kayo mag isip, leche kayo. Kahit sino pa yan, no other countries have a right to interfere in our domestic political affairs.

 

Tama ka dyan but would you admit ang US ang nagpaalis kay Marcos? And if Clinton won the presidency ongoing na ang plans nila (assuming hindi pa) para patalsikin si Du30.

Link to comment

 

Tama ka dyan but would you admit ang US ang nagpaalis kay Marcos? And if Clinton won the presidency ongoing na ang plans nila (assuming hindi pa) para patalsikin si Du30.

Just to clarify ... did the US came out in the open on these matters just as the Chinese president said that he will not allow duterte to be unseated?

Link to comment

Just to clarify ... did the US came out in the open on these matters just as the Chinese president said that he will not allow duterte to be unseated?

 

Is there a big difference for you kung sinabi ito openly and alam mo naman na ginagawa ito pailalim ng iba?

Edited by haroots2
Link to comment

 

Is there a big difference for you kung sinabi ito openly and alam mo naman na ginagawa ito pailalim ng iba?

 

Natural ... malaki ang pagkakaiba.

 

 

Yun isa since nanggaling mismo sa kanya, naibalita pa nga at walang denial eh can be considered and deemed factual.

 

Yun pinaaamin mo eh paano naman aaminin nun tao kung wala siyang personal knowledge, wala namang pagamin mula mismo sa america o presidente nito. Hindi ba hearsay lang at gusto mong aminin based on hearsay not facts?

Link to comment

Natural ... malaki ang pagkakaiba.

 

 

Yun isa since nanggaling mismo sa kanya, naibalita pa nga at walang denial eh can be considered and deemed factual.

 

Yun pinaaamin mo eh paano naman aaminin nun tao kung wala siyang personal knowledge, wala namang pagamin mula mismo sa america o presidente nito. Hindi ba hearsay lang at gusto mong aminin based on hearsay not facts?

 

So you keep a blind eye kahit alam mo na pero hindi kasi sila umaamin. Okay. Also protecting someone legally in power is different than ousting someone in power illegally.

Link to comment

 

So you keep a blind eye kahit alam mo na pero hindi kasi sila umaamin. Okay. Also protecting someone legally in power is different than ousting someone in power illegally.

Again let me reiterate what you were asking for...

 

Gusto mo i-confirm ang isang hearsay. Then mag agree batay sa hearsay. Aba"y mahirap yun nagdedesisyon batay sa chismis at baka makuryente.

 

But intindihin mo sinabi ni tk, hindi ba in general ayaw niya sa foreign intervention? So take it from there if totoo ngang may foreign intervention yun scenario mo kay makoy at duterte then hindi ba obvious kung ano ang sagot niya sa tanong mo?

 

Ako personally kung halimbawang totoo yun planong mapatalsik si duterte ng kano i dont think tama yan. But if you want me to admit na may oust duterte move ang US na wala akong personal knowledge o matibay na batayan paano ako magaagree/magconfirm sa iyo.

 

So gets mo na yun inconsistency sa gusto mo mangyari?

Link to comment

Again let me reiterate what you were asking for...

 

Gusto mo i-confirm ang isang hearsay. Then mag agree batay sa hearsay. Aba"y mahirap yun nagdedesisyon batay sa chismis at baka makuryente.

 

But intindihin mo sinabi ni tk, hindi ba in general ayaw niya sa foreign intervention? So take it from there if totoo ngang may foreign intervention yun scenario mo kay makoy at duterte then hindi ba obvious kung ano ang sagot niya sa tanong mo?

 

Ako personally kung halimbawang totoo yun planong mapatalsik si duterte ng kano i dont think tama yan. But if you want me to admit na may oust duterte move ang US na wala akong personal knowledge o matibay na batayan paano ako magaagree/magconfirm sa iyo.

 

So gets mo na yun inconsistency sa gusto mo mangyari?

 

But the only way China can protect Du30 is from foreign elements that want him ousted. Wala rin magagawa ang China internally. I think China said that publicly so that Du30 will still lean on them than US who keeps criticizing him. Also U.N can't do anything as long as China will use their veto power to protect Du30.

Edited by haroots2
Link to comment

 

But the only way China can protect Du30 is from foreign elements that want him ousted. Wala rin magagawa ang China internally. I think China said that publicly so that Du30 will still lean on them than US who keeps criticizing him. Also U.N can't do anything as long as China will use their veto power to protect Du30.

In short agree ka nga na makialam ang china right?

 

So ano ang nirereklamo mo kung baligtad ang mangyari at pagpapatalsik sa kanya ang nilalakad?

 

Be carefull for what you wish for ... ang problema sa mga tards na tulad mo basta pabor ok lang pero kapag di pabor tatalak ka na naman at panay himutok mo

Link to comment

In short agree ka nga na makialam ang china right?

 

So ano ang nirereklamo mo kung baligtad ang mangyari at pagpapatalsik sa kanya ang nilalakad?

 

Be carefull for what you wish for ... ang problema sa mga tards na tulad mo basta pabor ok lang pero kapag di pabor tatalak ka na naman at panay himutok mo

 

Hindi naman gagalaw ang China kung walang foreign force na gagalaw din diba? So its just basically neutralizing other foreign entity na makialam sa atin.

Link to comment

 

Hindi naman gagalaw ang China kung walang foreign force na gagalaw din diba? So its just basically neutralizing other foreign entity na makialam sa atin.

That is beside the point ... ang punto ni tk na nah react ka is general scenario wherein nakikialam ang isang foreigner.

 

Kasi if u will insist na gumlaw lang china because of kung anu man dahilan then the only way to proceed with that argument is for you to prove that there exist actual threat from say the US based om facts and not hearsay.meron ba maipapakita? So ibabalik ko tanong mo kay tk.can u confirm to have direct knowledge and factual basis that the US intends to unseat duterte.

 

Also sa ngayon dahil nagpahayag ng suporta china ok sa iyo. E bkt kung yun US magdeclare ng non support kay duterte at support sa iba ano gagawin mo magrereklamo ka na naman ng foreign intervention.

 

 

So ano ba talaga agree ka ba o hindi sa foreign intervention. Hindi yun pag pabor ok pag hindi reklamo ka

Edited by rooster69ph
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...