How Important Is The Sexual History Of Your Partner?

[Desensitize]

Not a biggie

[X-23]

Pag nakikipagsex sa bayarin na babae turned off ako. Takot actually.

[djsinple]

hmmm, d nmn mportante. Pro gusto ko p rin na pnag-uusapan namin.

[Liz]

Alamin nyo naman kung nagkasakit. Or kung may sakit. Dont just bang and bang. Ikakalat nyo pa with your different partners tomorrow and the day after.

 

Medical history should be discussed prior.

[naughtymonk]

Still Important. IMO Parang nagpabackground check ka ng isang applicant. Dapat you have the necessary information sa partner mo kasi di natin alam na may ginawa siyang kababalaghan sa past.

[sirace0404]

pano pag thera sya?

[AD3]

As long as thêre are no STDs both ways, sexual history should not matter that much in a relationship. The key word is "history", meaning it was all ịn the past

[rbfmale]

Not that important...

[j]

On 4/25/2021 at 12:26 AM, Liz said:

Alamin nyo naman kung nagkasakit. Or kung may sakit. Dont just bang and bang. Ikakalat nyo pa with your different partners tomorrow and the day after.

 

Medical history should be discussed prior.

pero mahirap ata i-bring up yun topic ng medical history.

konti lang aamin na nagkasakit sila

[burgerking]

bsta walang sakit and then open sya sa ganung usapan that is okay with me

 

[Tanya of Tokyo]

Mahirap ito , #staysingle muna ko

[bigbadboy_812]

Perhaps it’s important in the context of knowing the other person better. True, past relationships may give you a better understanding of the other person and how he/she would be as your partner. However when all is said and done, it all comes back to you. What is your purpose in getting together with that person? Is is short term or long term?

 

Personally, if I know that I’m only there for a short while, history, in terms of number,  really doesn’t matter. What weighs more is past medical history (ie. STDs)

But if I know I’m in for the long haul, then history takes on greater weight in the context of, as I said, getting to know the other person better. But at the end of the day, and I assume that it’s a real loving relationship,  it really shouldn’t matter how many they had in the past, as long as I’m the last.

Edited September 4, 2021 by bigbadboy_812

[id6230]

For me it is not so much as sexual history but sexually transmitted diseases.  One should not be sexually active if you are infectious.

[kano_d_great]

It is important but most of our partners won’t tell us about it. It’s up to us to see those tell-tale signs (red flags).

Edited September 6, 2021 by kano_d_great

[j]

On 9/4/2021 at 5:29 PM, bigbadboy_812 said:

Perhaps it’s important in the context of knowing the other person better. True, past relationships may give you a better understanding of the other person and how he/she would be as your partner. However when all is said and done, it all comes back to you. What is your purpose in getting together with that person? Is is short term or long term?

 

Personally, if I know that I’m only there for a short while, history, in terms of number,  really doesn’t matter. What weighs more is past medical history (ie. STDs)

But if I know I’m in for the long haul, then history takes on greater weight in the context of, as I said, getting to know the other person better. But at the end of the day, and I assume that it’s a real loving relationship,  it really shouldn’t matter how many they had in the past, as long as I’m the last.

pretty interesting opinion.

there may be some partners who do not reveal everything. aren't there people who have been together for so long but still get surprised that they did not know everything there is to know.

siguro naman after 15-20 years, lalabas na lahat ng effects ng std/sti.