Apo Marcos : Facts And Myths

[will robie]

Sabi ko naman sa iyo mag research ka at hindi yun nabubuhay sa kahibangan.

Ang problema sa iyo etong latest ruling lang ang may idea ka.

Makikisawsaw ka na lang di ka pa nag effort magbasa isinubo na nga. Hahaha

Did you understand the article I posted? It seems you didnt based on another manure of a reply. You still cant answer from who did the Marcoses steal. But then again, i am not waiting in vain for an answer simply because you have none. Again, you are way too easy. Edited November 23, 2018 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

Did you understand the article I posted? It seems you didnt based on another manure of a reply. You still cant answer from who did the Marcoses steal. But then again, i am not waiting in vain for an answer simply because you have none. Again, you are way too easy.

Anong pakialam ko diyan sa article na pinagsasabi mo.

Malinaw pa sa sikat ng araw na ur argument to which i replied is about you saying di pa final yun conviction thus insinuating di pa proven na magnanakaw si marcos. But like i said masyadong limited yan kaalaman mo kasi sa tamad mong magresearch.

 

Hahaha...at tuwing nababara ka ibabalik mo na naman usapan sa "you can't answer from who the marcoses steal".

 

As i said do your research...may internet ka naman kung gusto mo malaman sa tinatanong mo.

Edited November 23, 2018 by rooster69ph

[tk421]

Hindi nya talaga maintindihan.

 

His mind is too corrupt to even think that using government coffers as one's petty cash is actually stealing from the Filipino people.

[Dyson-sila]

Anong pakialam ko diyan sa article na pinagsasabi mo.

Malinaw pa sa sikat ng araw na ur argument to which i replied is about you saying di pa final yun conviction thus insinuating di pa proven na magnanakaw si marcos. But like i said masyadong limited yan kaalaman mo kasi sa tamad mong magresearch.

 

Hahaha...at tuwing nababara ka ibabalik mo na naman usapan sa "you can't answer from who the marcoses steal".

 

As i said do your research...may internet ka naman kung gusto mo malaman sa tinatanong mo.

 

Research din ba ang kumuha ng link sa websites na puro ads lang at CLICKBAIT?

[will robie]

Anong pakialam ko diyan sa article na pinagsasabi mo.

Malinaw pa sa sikat ng araw na ur argument to which i replied is about you saying di pa final yun conviction thus insinuating di pa proven na magnanakaw si marcos. But like i said masyadong limited yan kaalaman mo kasi sa tamad mong magresearch.

 

Hahaha...at tuwing nababara ka ibabalik mo na naman usapan sa "you can't answer from who the marcoses steal".

 

As i said do your research...may internet ka naman kung gusto mo malaman sa tinatanong mo.

Say what? The article that I showed has everything to do with what I said. Limited? Hahaha! I don't know whether to tell you you're projecting or that you're deluded. Haha! I can't help but laugh. Me? Tongue-tied? Haha! Since when? The last time I checked, you were the one who could not answer a simple question and you reply to me with nonsensical ad hominem posts which continuously weakens your moronic conjecture that the Marcoses are thieves. I don't need to do my research because even if I don't research, it is pretty obvious that I already discredited your vacuous posts. Your ridiculous posts never fail to make me laugh. Laughter is, indeed, the best medicine.

[will robie]

Hindi nya talaga maintindihan.

 

His mind is too corrupt to even think that using government coffers as one's petty cash is actually stealing from the Filipino people.

Let's see here. So give me a case that states that the Marcoses stole from government coffers. I won't wait for an answer because you can't find one. Yellowtards just love to project when they're cornered.

[rooster69ph]

Say what? The article that I showed has everything to do with what I said. Limited? Hahaha! I don't know whether to tell you you're projecting or that you're deluded. Haha! I can't help but laugh. Me? Tongue-tied? Haha! Since when? The last time I checked, you were the one who could not answer a simple question and you reply to me with nonsensical ad hominem posts which continuously weakens your moronic conjecture that the Marcoses are thieves. I don't need to do my research because even if I don't research, it is pretty obvious that I already discredited your vacuous posts. Your ridiculous posts never fail to make me laugh. Laughter is, indeed, the best medicine.

 

again you are insisting on your stupidity ... and limited knowledge

 

you are showing me an article that says no case should have been filed against the marcoses in reference to the latest conviction. this in response to what i said earlier is that there is jurisprudence already, other than this latest conviction that proves they are thieves because they cant prove the legitimate souce of their asset. kaso ayaw mo mag research ayun ngat isinubo na. as such immaterial yan pinapakita mo kasi all it tries to downplay is the latest ... i repeat, the latest conviction on meldy.

 

buy hey case or no case that lead to this latest conviction simple lang naman pinaguusapan natin dito ... kung ano ang maisasagot mo sa isang simpleng katanungan. ano ang legitimate source ng income kaya nagkaroon ng ganun kalaking pagmamayari ang mga marcoses? hindi ito kailanman nasabot o naipaliwanag ng mga marcoses sa korte. baka ikaw kaya mo.

 

try harder dummy. libre ang magmukhang tanga at tamad kaso masyado mong ginalingan.

Edited November 23, 2018 by rooster69ph

[rooster69ph]

Hindi nya talaga maintindihan.

 

His mind is too corrupt to even think that using government coffers as one's petty cash is actually stealing from the Filipino people.

i think this is more because nabara as he cant move on in defending yun recent conviction at yun pa rin defense argument niya kahit na nakapagmove-on na at ibang issue na yun pinaguusapan. yun natauhan ayun kung anu-anong palusot na ginagawa to save face 😂

 

 

Research din ba ang kumuha ng link sa websites na puro ads lang at CLICKBAIT?

really? are you serious?

 

well maybe for some mostly marcostard loyalists ... which is why it reflects on them based on the kind of questions they raise and the answers they give.

Edited November 23, 2018 by rooster69ph

[will robie]

you are showing me an article that says no case should have been filed against the marcoses in reference to the latest conviction. this in response to what i said earlier is that there is jurisprudence already, other than this latest conviction that proves they are thieves because they cant prove the legitimate souce of their asset. kaso ayaw mo mag research ayun ngat isinubo na. as such immaterial yan pinapakita mo kasi all it tries to downplay is the latest ... i repeat, the latest conviction on meldy.

 

Hahahahaha! Did you really read the article? Hahahaha! Nowhere in the article did it say or imply that no case should have been filed against the Marcoses. It's either you didn't read the article or you didn't really understand the article. I would bet on the former but then again, even if you did read the article, the article is probably beyond your comprehension. Haha! You've been making me laugh eversince last night. This is fun. Of course, you'd say the article is immaterial since it further vitiated your assertion that the Marcoses are thieves, not that mine wasn't enough. Why do I have to resort to overkill? Haha! The article further proves that your assertion that the Marcoses are thieves is just a harebrained conjecture. Your level of discourse is still gutter level. But keep them coming. I can't promise, though, that I won't laugh. Haha!

again you are insisting on your stupidity ... and limited knowledge

Your post above stating that the article says that no case should have been filed against the Marcoses in reference to the latest conviction only further enhances this projection of yours. Haha!

Edited November 24, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

buy hey case or no case that lead to this latest conviction simple lang naman pinaguusapan natin dito ... kung ano ang maisasagot mo sa isang simpleng katanungan. ano ang legitimate source ng income kaya nagkaroon ng ganun kalaking pagmamayari ang mga marcoses? hindi ito kailanman nasabot o naipaliwanag ng mga marcoses sa korte. baka ikaw kaya mo.

 

try harder dummy. libre ang magmukhang tanga at tamad kaso masyado mong ginalingan.

Naks, may patry harder-try harder ka na ngayon. Haha! If projecting will make you feel good about yourself, be my guest. Look, I don't even need to think to vitiate your posts. Hahaha! Keep your dim-witted replies coming. I get a kick out of laughing at them.

Edited November 24, 2018 by will robie

[camiar]

So, tell me, where was it proven that anything was stolen by Marcos from government coffers?

 

People in power can create wealth without having to steal taxpayers' money.

 

You can't prove that they stole money. All you can offer are ad hominems.

 

 

I can, with Imelda's recent conviction at the Sandiganbayan. That should more than suffice. Unless you're being you. HELLOOOOOO, EARTH TO CAMIAR.

 

You can't.

 

Because you don't even know what you're talking about. Clueless, even,

 

Sandiganbayan's conviction verdict on Mrs. Marcos has nothing to do with with stolen money. You didn't know that, do you?

 

Read up to catch up on the discussions here. You're way behind.

[flatwall]

Marcos p rn

[will robie]

 

https://news.abs-cbn.com/video/news/11/30/18/imelda-marcos-allowed-to-post-bail

Yellowtards, you can now cry a thousand rivers. I don't think the supermarkets have enough tissues for all of you.

 

Sa isang yellowtard na madaming alternicks, nakatulog ka ba? Haha!

[robbietan]

yellowtards live in a fantasy world.

 

a world where they believe that Abnoynoy Sr is not a murderer convicted by the Supreme Court

[will robie]

yellowtards live in a fantasy world.

 

a world where they believe that Abnoynoy Sr is not a murderer convicted by the Supreme Court

There are a couple of yellowtards here, some with a plethora of alternicks, and you will know who they are based on their laughable posts.