Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Recommended Posts

Whatever. It still invalidates your long time defense "have any of the Marcoses been found guilty of corruption". Well... here you go. Enjoy the burn!

 

Imelda would not be put into jail. kasi matanda na siya. Matandang convict according sandiganbayan. Kayo kase mga delawan eh. hindi ninyo tinantanan. ayan tuloy naging convict.

.

Link to comment

You can shout to high heavens that Imelda has been convicted but it has not been ruled with finality. But go ahead and cheer. It is not a sin to cheer for something that has not been achieved and that is getting a Marcos behind bars. Go ahead and cheer lustily. :lol:

Edited by will robie
Link to comment

Imelda, as crooked as she is, will never be put behind bars.

 

Either of the following will happen:

 

1) the appellate court will find a flimsy excuse to overturn the decision,

2) her conviction will be sustained, but she will not be jailed due to humanitarian reasons or

3) she will be pardoned by bff Duterte.

 

She will remain free for as long as she lives. She, her children, and her grandchildren will enjoy the stolen wealth for as long as they live. Dumbass loyalists will continue to worship that family and insist the Marcoses are innocent without being able to show an ounce of evidence to support their claim.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment

Yes, Imelda will never be put behind bars. There will be an Motion for Reconsideration filed and if that fails, the Supreme Court will be the final arbiter. I doubt Imelda will be convicted with finality by the SC if it goes to the SC. Bitter yellowtards can only sigh in exasperation.

 

Sige pa. Magsabi ka pa ng "burn, baby, burn!" :lol:

Edited by will robie
Link to comment

Kahit hindi yan makulong, the point is she was found to be corrupt and that will never be erased from the records.

 

Yun isa dyan siguradong sigurado na ma a acquit sa SC... siguro alam niya na corrupt din kasi mga naka upo dun ngayon.

 

If SC reverse the decision it will not be in the record that she is a convicted criminal diba?

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...