Apo Marcos : Facts And Myths

[will robie]

 

 

2. *yawn* Next excuse pls

Speaking for yourself again, carter?

[will robie]

 

 

3. Case law, black letter law are publicly accessible. Bank records are not, but we have no reason to believe PNB didn't turn over the funds accordingly. But sure, keep telling yourself that I don't have proof.

 

Another flimsy excuse, carter. Haven't you run out of it?

 

 

4. "Mortified" doesn't mean what you think it means. Also, stop being a hypocrite and just show us your proof already.

Speaking for yourself again? No, I am using the word "mortify" based on its meaning.

Edited September 12, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

 

5. I'm not here to convince you, as it is clear your mind is made up. I'm here to let everyone else know that you're wrong and that you have no proof to back any of your beliefs. And because you refuse to show any proof because excuses, you're just proving me right.

Crowdsourcing, carter? Hahahaha! Pathetic. Aren't you confident about your "hearsay" posts?

 

You can believe what you wanna believe. I don't give a rat's ass, carter.

 

Based on this post, it is clear that yung puntirya mo pala ako at hindi si Macoy. Hahaha! I almost fell off my seat laughing at this post. I don't blame you if you're trying in vain to debunk me. You're not the first and you will definitely not be the last.

6. See #3. So ano na, asan na proof mo?

You challenged my post, you prove it. Asan ang sayo? I get this feeling I will be waiting in vain.

Edited September 12, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

 

7. Apparently I'm not alone.

 

Called shot: will is going to reply with more "prove me wrong" and "convince me" posturing without actually proving anything he claims to believe, plus more "you don't have proof" claims despite myself and several others mentioning case law, black letter law, and providing links. Tapos, I'm just going to keep pointing out all of will's tactics for avoiding having to provide proof for whatever he believes about the Marcoses, because he has *no* proof of anything he believes on the Marcoses. Bonus: he will tell us to just use the internet and research for ourselves what his proof is, because only people who don't believe in the Marcoses have the burden of proof.

I pity you, carter. You've been reduced to an ad hominem post because you just can't debunk my post. Hahaha! Pwned.

Edited September 12, 2018 by will robie

[jc44 - RETIRED]

LOL @will. So predictable.

 

Called shot: will is going to reply with more "prove me wrong" and "convince me" posturing without actually proving anything he claims to believe, plus more "you don't have proof" claims despite myself and several others mentioning case law, black letter law, and providing links. Tapos, I'm just going to keep pointing out all of will's tactics for avoiding having to provide proof for whatever he believes about the Marcoses, because he has *no* proof of anything he believes on the Marcoses. Bonus: he will tell us to just use the internet and research for ourselves what his proof is, because only people who don't believe in the Marcoses have the burden of proof.

[will robie]

@carter

 

If that inane post will make your day, go ahead.

Edited September 13, 2018 by will robie

[jc44 - RETIRED]

So, that's it? All that drama and multiple posts, and still no proof of your beliefs on the Marcoses?

K.

[will robie]

Speaking for yourself again, carter. Ayaw mo na ba magcrowdsourcing kasi isa lang pumansin sayo at yung pumansin sayo wala pang alam?

[jc44 - RETIRED]

Boring.

Eto hindi boring: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRhltGGiJCg&feature=youtu.be

Edited September 15, 2018 by johncarter44

[will robie]

Paano ba yan mga dilawan? SC affirms acquittal of Imelda Marcos on 32 counts of dollar salting. The only case that these dilawans can present is a civil case which did not land any Marcos in jail. Boring ba?

Edited September 22, 2018 by will robie

[jc44 - RETIRED]

"Marcos was acquitted of 32 counts of dollar-salting in 2008 by the Manila Regional Trial Court (RTC)) under Judge Silvino Pampilo Jr. Dollar-salting is the criminal act of stashing foreign currency money abroad without the authority of the Central Bank.

After the Marcoses fled the country in 1986, the government of former president Corazon Aquino found documents in Malacañang that revealed a number of Swiss bank accounts where dollar purchases were deposited.

Swiss investigating magistrate Peter Cosenday froze the Swiss banks, and gave the Philippine government a one-year timeline to file cases. To this day, the money is held in escrow by the Philippine government and is part of the continuing efforts to recover ill-gotten wealth.

But to hold the Marcoses criminally accountable, the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) filed 32 counts of violation of the Central Bank Act using the documents as evidence.

 

However, Judge Pampilo acquitted Mrs Marcos because the prosecution presented as witnesses only PCGG and Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) officials to authenticate the documents.

This, Pampilo said, makes their testimonies hearsay because they are neither the source of documents nor do they have personal knowledge." (quoting a Rappler article discussing the case.)

Acquitted on technicality. I agree with the decision. Palpak yan ng prosecution.

The problem here is that you are conflating the absence of a conviction with a finding of innocence. Legally, correct. Rationally, mali. Just because a criminal gets away with the crime doesn't mean she didn't commit the crime. Yan ang problema sa logic mo ever since. And as usual, hindi ka pa rin umaasenso.

[will robie]

 

The problem here is that you are conflating the absence of a conviction with a finding of innocence. Legally, correct. Rationally, mali. Just because a criminal gets away with the crime doesn't mean she didn't commit the crime. Yan ang problema sa logic mo ever since. And as usual, hindi ka pa rin umaasenso.

 

Criminal because you said so? Haha! Imelda got acquitted. If you think she's a criminal, go on believing your warped beliefs. There is no problem with my logic, carter. It seems you have an apparent problem with acceptance. Your nonsensical ad hominems won't change the fact that Imelda was acquitted. Don't make your bitterness obvious, carter. I am relishing this putatively bitter post. Live with it. Hahaha!

Edited September 25, 2018 by will robie

[tk421]

Imelda Marcos found guilty of graft, faces arrest

 

https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/11/09/18/imelda-marcos-found-guilty-of-graft

 

BURN! LOL.

Edited November 9, 2018 by tk421

[daphne loves derby]

JUSTICE IS SERVED

 

JUST IN: Sandiganbayan 5th Division FINDS IMELDA MARCOS GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT of 7 counts of graft. She is sentenced to prison of 6years and 1 month to 11 years maximum for each count

 

CONTEXT: This is for the charges filed way back in 1991 for allegedly creating private organizations in Switzerland while holding government posts from 1968 to 1986.

Edited November 9, 2018 by daphne loves derby

[will robie]

I can’t help but laugh at people who are are having a blast at this news. Before you rejoice, make sure that Imeldific actually lands in jail. Her case is still appealable. Haha!