will robie Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 what an argument this is...next pleaseEven your comeback is lame. The next time you argue, make sure you have depth instead of shallow rants. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Even your comeback is lame. The next time you argue, make sure you have depth instead of shallow rants. anything else? ....sagadin mo na kahibangan at katangahan mo habang wala ako sa mood makipagtalo. lame? i just dont feel like having the patience to explain myself to idiots who fools themselves thinking they come up intelligent arguments but actually can only understand from their level of perception Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Wouldnt be surprise if the retort would be something like "speak for yourself" hahaha Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 The funny thing is that kapag may sinabi o pinangako si dutards sabay sabay ang allehluyah ng mga tards. like endo sinabi na ng mga kritiko dati na mahirap mangyari yan ano ang sagot ng mga tards...ibahin ninyo si dutards siya lang ang may balls sa pagbabago. Change is coming. Ngayon ano na? Tahimik na si dutard at spokeperson na lang nagsasalita at humaharap sa issue. Yun mga tard naman ayan iba na sinasabi imbes na mag stick dun sa inaasahang change to end endo...may ginawa naman daw kahit na aminadong trapo moves lang ang nangyari. Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 anything else? ....sagadin mo na kahibangan at katangahan mo habang wala ako sa mood makipagtalo. lame? i just dont feel like having the patience to explain myself to idiots who fools themselves thinking they come up intelligent arguments but actually can only understand from their level of perceptionSpeaking for yourself again? Haha! Your reasoning still sucks. So does your grammar. Even this post is incoherent. I don't need to say ad hominems to you. Your posts speak for themselves. Shallow and moronic. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 napunta na sa usaping grammar ... certified pwned Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 (edited) napunta na sa usaping grammar ... certified pwnedKasi sinabi mo? Try reading your own post. It's not even coherent. Bitter ka pa ba na hindi pa din natupad promise ni Duterte sa endo? Edited May 30, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Sabi ko na di mo kaya sagutin yung tanong ko. Isn't it the norm here? Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted June 2, 2018 Share Posted June 2, 2018 yan ang problema sa mga tards...coa na ang nagsabing may nilabag si calida ayun nagtatangtangahan pa rin at wala daw mali itong ginagawa kundi may gusto lang manira bilang paghihiganti, diyos ko naman bakit ba may mga taong sinalo ang lahat ng katangahan Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 (edited) yan ang problema sa mga tards...coa na ang nagsabing may nilabag si calida ayun nagtatangtangahan pa rin at wala daw mali itong ginagawa kundi may gusto lang manira bilang paghihiganti, diyos ko naman bakit ba may mga taong sinalo ang lahat ng katangahanThe next time you post an article, make sure you know what you are attaching. It's obvious that you are clueless of what you posted to discredit what I said that Calida didn't do anything wrong. Basta basta magpopost ng article, hindi naman pala naintindihan yung pinagpopost. Stop mortifying yourself. Again and again, you don't belong here. Florin Hilbay, former Solgen during Aquino's time, and Jose Calida both agree that the allowances and honoraria given to the lawyers in their office are legal. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/06/03/1821205/calida-hilbay-say-allowances-legal Calida said the honoraria and allowances were paid in accordance with law, particularly Section 1(i) of Presidential Decree No. 478, which defines the powers and functions of the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), and Section 35(9), Chapter 12, Title III, Book IV of Executive Order No. 292 or the Administrative Code. “These provisions authorize the OSG lawyers to receive allowances and honoraria for the legal services they render without qualification as to the number of agreements with client agencies and without limitation/cap as to the amount. The authority of these agencies to pay OSG lawyers honoraria and allowances for services rendered is restated in Section 8 of Republic Act No. 9417 (An Act to Strengthen the Office of the Solicitor General),” Calida explained.“There is therefore no basis for the reported Commission on Audit (COA) finding of alleged payment of ‘excessive honoraria and allowances,’” the OSG added Read this and understand before discrediting what I said. Natatawa na lang ako sayo kasi kahit ano popost mo basta lang supalpalin ako but you have no idea what the issue is about. Pahiya ka na naman. Edited June 3, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 The next time you post an article, make sure you know what you are attaching. It's obvious that you are clueless of what you posted to discredit what I said that Calida didn't do anything wrong. Basta basta magpopost ng article, hindi naman pala naintindihan yung pinagpopost. Stop mortifying yourself. Again and again, you don't belong here. Florin Hilbay, former Solgen during Aquino's time, and Jose Calida both agree that the allowances and honoraria given to the lawyers in their office are legal. Read this and understand before discrediting what I said. Natatawa na lang ako sayo kasi kahit ano popost mo basta lang supalpalin ako but you have no idea what the issue is about. Pahiya ka na naman. ang problema diyan sa palusot mo eh ang sinabi/argumento ni hilbay mismo...basag ang palusot na abswelto si calida. “These provisions authorize the OSG lawyers to receive allowances and honoraria for the legal services they render without qualification as to the number of agreements with client agencies and without limitation/cap as to the amount. The authority of these agencies to pay OSG lawyers honoraria and allowances for services rendered is restated in Section 8 of Republic Act No. 9417 (An Act to Strengthen the Office of the Solicitor General),” Calida explained.Read more at https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/06/03/1821205/calida-hilbay-say-allowances-legal#oeFmPQlwg2Vp7XXZ.99 “There is a practical reason for these allowances—allow the institution to retain good lawyers. Litigation takes time and expertise needs to be developed. If OSG lawyers are so easily pirated by law firms and corporations, it will prevent the government from developing a good career bureaucracy that can litigate for the republic over long periods,” said Hilbay. Read more at https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/06/03/1821205/calida-hilbay-say-allowances-legal#oeFmPQlwg2Vp7XXZ.99 si calida ba eh isa sa mga “osg lawyer” that the osg must be able to retain? hahaha. aba’y kung pati siya kasama sa pribilehiyong yan eh di wala nang control kung magkano ang pwede niyang kurakutin este kunin bilang allowance para sa kanyang sarili. ang camoteng tard nakahanap lang ng palusot tira agad ni hindi pinagisipan muna. Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 (edited) ang problema diyan sa palusot mo eh ang sinabi/argumento ni hilbay mismo...basag ang palusot na abswelto si calida. "Palusot" is your default answer to a post of mine that you are clueless about.“These provisions authorize the OSG lawyers to receive allowances and honoraria for the legal services they render without qualification as to the number of agreements with client agencies and without limitation/cap as to the amount. The authority of these agencies to pay OSG lawyers honoraria and allowances for services rendered is restated in Section 8 of Republic Act No. 9417 (An Act to Strengthen the Office of the Solicitor General),” Calida explained.Read more at https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/06/03/1821205/calida-hilbay-say-allowances-legal#oeFmPQlwg2Vp7XXZ.99 Supalpalin mo nga ito. Edited June 3, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 (edited) si calida ba eh isa sa mga “osg lawyer” that the osg must be able to retain? hahaha. aba’y kung pati siya kasama sa pribilehiyong yan eh di wala nang control kung magkano ang pwede niyang kurakutin este kunin bilang allowance para sa kanyang sarili. ang camoteng tard nakahanap lang ng palusot tira agad ni hindi pinagisipan muna.Speaking for yourself again? I already spoon fed you the law as to why the OSG lawyers are authorized to give allowances, yet, you are still clueless. So? Does your moronic opinion about Calida supersede the law? Haha! You're having a difficult time grasping it. This post has "trolling" written all over it. Your post backfired simply because you don't understand what is being posted. “There is a practical reason for these allowances—allow the institution to retain good lawyers. Litigation takes time and expertise needs to be developed. If OSG lawyers are so easily pirated by law firms and corporations, it will prevent the government from developing a good career bureaucracy that can litigate for the republic over long periods,” said Hilbay.Read more at https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/06/03/1821205/calida-hilbay-say-allowances-legal#oeFmPQlwg2Vp7XXZ.99 Try discrediting this too. Kung kaya ng IQ mo. Edited June 3, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 Speaking for yourself again? I already spoon fed you the law as to why the OSG lawyers are authorized to give allowances, yet, you are still clueless. So? Does your moronic opinion supersede the law? Haha! You're having a difficult time grasping it. This post has "trolling" written all over it. Your post backfired simply because you don't understand what is being posted. dami mong pautot pero soplang pa rin ... simpleng tanong, si solgen ba ay isang “osg lawyer that the osg needs to retain” thus qualify him to also receive allowances in excess of 50% of his annual salary? paki sagot oo o hindi? wag mo na paikutin at pahabain ang usapan. ayan ang problema sa certified camote di kasi nagiisip excited agad makabanat ayun kapag nasoplang ayun trolling ang defense mechanism. Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 (edited) dami mong pautot pero soplang pa rin ... How deluded can you get? Another idiotic default answer from someone who is clueless about the issue. simpleng tanong, si solgen ba ay isang “osg lawyer that the osg needs to retain” thus qualify him to also receive allowances in excess of 50% of his annual salary? paki sagot oo o hindi? wag mo na paikutin at pahabain ang usapan. I already spoon fed you. I don't need to answer questions have answers in the articles. Kung hindi mo alam yung sagot dito, it only means you still are clueless as to the issue. Besides, I am in no obligation to answer your stupid questions. Edited June 3, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.