JFK Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Perspectives change based on changing situations. For example, I was posting against Duterte in this forum during the election period because i believe Binay would have made a better president. And I still do. But when Duterte won, I was thankful that it was not anybody from Abnoy's inept government. So now, I am in favor the Du30 administration, because like the FVR and GMA administrations, this current admin can get things done. Total opposite of the hypocritical and inept Cory and Abnoy governments.I agree. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 With that isa lang masasabi ko ... NATATAWA AKO. HIHIHIHI Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted November 25, 2017 Share Posted November 25, 2017 http://image.ibb.co/jonT56/Hear_You_02.jpg Dalas nga kumalanching ang lata .... Saan saan nagkakalat at nagpaparamdam. Lol Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 Brad, baliw ang tawag sa tao na sarili lang ang kausap di ba?Just dont feed the troll. Quote Link to comment
Bolj Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 and any evidence found after a shooting incident is dubious, knowing how our police force have a knack for messing with evidence.Kindly prove that about 51% of our police force are doing it, mind you when it regards to the AFP-PNP-DND comments you make i'll see to it you prove your claims with facts Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 Here's the thing with your 51% rule. even if it's less than 51%, if the wrong cop happens to be the one conducting the operation, then it does not matter. PNP has been known to "mishandle" evidences before. And they've even been admitted to by a Police Chief in Central Luzon. That is why some drug pushers get to be acquitted in court, due to tampered evidences. By tampered, I'm speaking in general terms, so it just doesn't mean planted. I don't know how many news segments I saw that showed the PNP presenting evidences to media (like guns and drugs), holding them with their bare hands. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 (edited) This is the kind of thinking some if not most of these dutertards have "Naniniwala ako na magiging extensive ang kampanya niya sa drugs kahit alam ko na hindi niya magtatapos ito wiithin 6 months." And remember these dutertards seems to claim to have the power of foresight..lol Now we wonder how extensive really is extensive ....to understand this we just probably have to look into the preference of their lodi whom as i've said earlier greatly influence them. Their lodi is not happy with the way this pdea-led operations been going on. Not much funfare, very low-key ...they have results (which is commensurate i think given their numbers) but not headline hogging. He prefers the much publicized pnp-led operations which we all know is far more controvertial with issues on ejk unlike what we've experience lately under pdea. So yeah, its not hard hard to deduce that the sense of justice is skewed and morals are lacking for these kind of people. Edited November 27, 2017 by rooster69ph Quote Link to comment
Bolj Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 Here's the thing with your 51% rule. even if it's less than 51%, if the wrong cop happens to be the one conducting the operation, then it does not matter. PNP has been known to "mishandle" evidences before. And they've even been admitted to by a Police Chief in Central Luzon. That is why some drug pushers get to be acquitted in court, due to tampered evidences. By tampered, I'm speaking in general terms, so it just doesn't mean planted. I don't know how many news segments I saw that showed the PNP presenting evidences to media (like guns and drugs), holding them with their bare hands.Thank you for putting out the falsities in your statements, you did not address things and "opinions" not "facts" that are loop holes in your whole argument. You like to take things in totality a lot and like to generalize a lot, so be prepared to be countered. Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 Thank you for putting out the falsities in your statements, you did not address things and "opinions" not "facts" that are loop holes in your whole argument. You like to take things in totality a lot and like to generalize a lot, so be prepared to be countered. Oh no, it's not false. Police have been known for shortcuts, hiding/planting evidences or just plain incompetence. But most of the time, they do know how to hide their tracks. In order to uncover just how bad it is, it needs investigation from a neutral third party. While I cannot give you exact numbers, this is where the CHR is supposed to come in. You see, these are not merely isolated cases. https://businessmirror.com.ph/human-rights-watch-cops-k*ll-drug-suspects-plant-evidence-in-cover-ups/http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/597241/lacson-presents-cctv-footage-of-cops-allegedly-planting-drugs/story/http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/09/28/1743571/mpd-cops-face-murder-planting-evidence-raps Quote Link to comment
Bolj Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 Oh no, it's not false. Police have been known for shortcuts, hiding/planting evidences or just plain incompetence. But most of the time, they do know how to hide their tracks. In order to uncover just how bad it is, it needs investigation from a neutral third party. While I cannot give you exact numbers, this is where the CHR is supposed to come in. You see, these are not merely isolated cases. https://businessmirror.com.ph/human-rights-watch-cops-k*ll-drug-suspects-plant-evidence-in-cover-ups/http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/597241/lacson-presents-cctv-footage-of-cops-allegedly-planting-drugs/story/http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/09/28/1743571/mpd-cops-face-murder-planting-evidence-rapsNope thank you, im ok with the fact that you negated your previous statement by your other statement. "Most of the time" - prove it, until then keep saying and keep repeating yourself. You are free to make far fetched assumptions which you cannot even prove by mere figures. Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 Well you can deny it all you want. It just shows how low empathy has fallen so far in society. Quote Link to comment
Bolj Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 Well you can deny it all you want. It just shows how low empathy has fallen so far in society.Keep twisting the point and the plot, the only thing im having a problem is how you construct your statements in reference to our PNP-AFP or any Military of the Assumptions you have. Until then see you in your next unthought of statements. Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 Assumptions with video evidence. LOL. Quote Link to comment
Bolj Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 any evidence found after a shooting incident is dubious, knowing how our police force have a knack for messing with evidence.This is your general assumption, you still don't get it do you.Learn how to use "the" and "a" in a statement. Ikaw dyan ang mahilig gumamit ng mga absolute assumptions, tapong tatanungin ka ng absolute proof d mo maibigay. Sa tingin mo ang 3-10 videos mong yan constitutes to half of the population of our police force? Kulang ka pa 6,000+. Cge post kapa dyan ng d pinagiisipan, p-point out ko mali mo. Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 Well... I'm being educated on assumptions now. How ironic since it's the police and the president who have a knack for making assumptions, also. About 7,000 assumptions and counting... Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.