dewwy Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 bvulgari is for jewelries imo, they aint good at watches, for me, i only wear my one and only patek, its the only watch i have. sh*t is almost as expensive as my car Quote Link to comment
redshirt Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 (edited) Akin mumurahing Fossil lang but damn its pretty big for a watch that costs aqbout 5k   did a little backreading ( mga 5 pages ) wala akong nakitang audemars piguet na watch.... Isn't it kinda in the lines of Patek Philippe? Edited April 30, 2007 by redshirt Quote Link to comment
Ken Miura Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 wala akong nakitang audemars piguet na watch.... Isn't it kinda in the lines of Patek Philippe?  Not quite. Quote Link to comment
MODERATOR bonito99 Posted May 1, 2007 Author MODERATOR Share Posted May 1, 2007 bvulgari is for jewelries imo, they aint good at watches, for me, i only wear my one and only patek, its the only watch i have. sh*t is almost as expensive as my car  And what's your car? What kind of Patek? Quote Link to comment
^ely^ Posted May 1, 2007 Share Posted May 1, 2007 ESPRIT Chronograph / Kenneth Cole Collection / Nike Quote Link to comment
marvin_8 Posted May 1, 2007 Share Posted May 1, 2007 i don't wear one. i rely on my cellular for time . sayang sa pera eh.. baka maholdap pa ako.. sayang naman ang buhay kung mapagdiskitahan pa dahil sa relo Quote Link to comment
Mild Seven Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 (edited) wala akong nakitang audemars piguet na watch.... Isn't it kinda in the lines of Patek Philippe?Not quite. lucerne sells them here. it depends on the style but am assuming it's cheaper than a patek. my father gave me one, a 2 toned royal oak. Edited May 2, 2007 by mild seven Quote Link to comment
Vertu Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 Audemar's Royal Oak is their signature watch which they launched in the late 70s. Patek countered with their Nautilus line which is now making a comeback.  The Royal Oak (stainless steel) is more expensive (around P450k) than the Patek Calatrava (P350K) which is Patek's entry level.  The Royal Oak is more impressive because of its shape and size and it looks more sporty. There are a few limted editions, one which was featured in the Terminator 3 movie (limited to 500 pcs). Lucerne Shangrila has a nice display on the Audemars. Quote Link to comment
Mild Seven Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 Audemar's Royal Oak is their signature watch which they launched in the late 70s. Patek countered with their Nautilus line which is now making a comeback.  The Royal Oak (stainless steel) is more expensive (around P450k) than the Patek Calatrava (P350K) which is Patek's entry level.  The Royal Oak is more impressive because of its shape and size and it looks more sporty. There are a few limted editions, one which was featured in the Terminator 3 movie (limited to 500 pcs). Lucerne Shangrila has a nice display on the Audemars. padre, any idea how much a 2 toned costs? Quote Link to comment
happy rider Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 Audemar's Royal Oak is their signature watch which they launched in the late 70s. Patek countered with their Nautilus line which is now making a comeback.  The Royal Oak (stainless steel) is more expensive (around P450k) than the Patek Calatrava (P350K) which is Patek's entry level.  The Royal Oak is more impressive because of its shape and size and it looks more sporty. There are a few limted editions, one which was featured in the Terminator 3 movie (limited to 500 pcs). Lucerne Shangrila has a nice display on the Audemars.thanks on the info sir. From your POV which do you think is more stylish and prestigious Audemars or Patek? Quote Link to comment
Vertu Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 I have no idea. I just checked with Lucerne Shangrila, they don't have any two tones. Just all steel. Quote Link to comment
chipmaker Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 (edited) rubber strapped g-shock for malling daysmetal strapped g-shock for the officeeither of metal strapped or leather strapped omega seamasters for formal wear  but lately i've always been wearing my metal strapped seiko 5 landshark! :thumbsupsmiley: now i understand why a lot of people are going gaga over seiko divers watches! they're such an understatement!  what's next? i'm saving up for an iwc aquatimer automatic 2000! :thumbsupsmiley: Edited May 2, 2007 by chipmaker Quote Link to comment
Vertu Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 Happy Rider, It depends on your classification, i believe both are better than a rolex as both are considered to be in the top 10. Patek is considered by most to be the pinnacle of watches. I have the patek annual calendar which i enjoy wearing on the weekends. The audemar is a big bulky around 40mm so if you have a small wrist, medyo awkward ang dating.  My point of view, if you are starting to enjoy watches, the Audemar will be a better bet. Its not that pricey as that of the middle / higher models of the patek which would be in the 950K and up range. Quote Link to comment
posta_code Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 Id go with the AP...edward piguet.......patek are excellent timepieces but it gives the impression of grandfather or old uncle to me. just my opinion. only Patek i like, if i ever purchase one is the gondolo 5111G in white gold.....yellow gold watches or two tones are...ummmm old people watches..that's just my opinion though. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.