Guest megalodon Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Common... stop wiggling around. You're just mocking yourself. Eto post natin ulit un post mo...-Uhm, doggy, it was my analysis. Not yours. Masyado kang affected sa analysis ko. Go make your own analysis. Problema kasi sayo, masyado kang obsessed na makabawi sa akin. So now you're saying that when you posted you did not know the result and you're talking about the series and not just one game. HAHAHA ... you're so funny. PAlusot ka na naman. The post before yours have already indicated that UTAH won. That was an hour before you post. So what now? Hindi ka nagbabasa? Yan ba ang palusot mo ngayon?-Obviously, you don't understand the meaning of analysis dog. You're way too affected by my posts. Can't get over the past wherein I always humiliate you? OK, assuming I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you really didn't know the result at the time you made that post. Sinabi mo pa din na "Nevertheless a much needed win to squre the series" ... this is proof that you are now talking about GAME 2 wherein UTAH need to win to level the series at 1 apiece. Remember, as you claim at this point you don't know the game 2 result and the series is only 1-0. My comment state that the JAZZ actually were able to do what you did not expect them to do in Game 2. May mali ba sa mga sinulat ko? So ano ang pinuputak mong I did not understand your post? Again, as I have repeatedly challenge you, show me FACTS to prove otherwise. Until now wala ka pa din maipakita sa akin to support your accusations. Stop kidding me. Obvious na this is another one of your ESCAPE ACT.-Haha! Man oh man. You really are obsessed in getting even. Use your real nick peithe. Sinsuspend ba kaya hindi mo magamit? Again, I'll stress out that it is my analysis. Problema sayo, lahat ng post ko kinokontra mo para lang makabawi sa akin. I suggest that you stop yackking ... nag self distruct ka na. Wag ka na mag reply kasi puros palusot ka na naman or hihirit ka lang ng personal attacks para malihis sa issue. Let's end this topic.-On the contrary, you're the one who's self-destructing. These posts only show na gusto mong makabawi sa akin coz parati kang napapahiya. Quote Link to comment
CELTS Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Common... stop wiggling around. You're just mocking yourself. Eto post natin ulit un post mo...-Uhm, doggy, it was my analysis. Not yours. Masyado kang affected sa analysis ko. Go make your own analysis. Problema kasi sayo, masyado kang obsessed na makabawi sa akin. So now you're saying that when you posted you did not know the result and you're talking about the series and not just one game. HAHAHA ... you're so funny. PAlusot ka na naman. The post before yours have already indicated that UTAH won. That was an hour before you post. So what now? Hindi ka nagbabasa? Yan ba ang palusot mo ngayon?-Obviously, you don't understand the meaning of analysis dog. You're way too affected by my posts. Can't get over the past wherein I always humiliate you? There are various points raised ... and no direct answers to these. As I said If you don't have anything more relevant to say stop replying to my post ... end of topic. However, as long as you reply then it means OK, assuming I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you really didn't know the result at the time you made that post. Sinabi mo pa din na "Nevertheless a much needed win to squre the series" ... this is proof that you are now talking about GAME 2 wherein UTAH need to win to level the series at 1 apiece. Remember, as you claim at this point you don't know the game 2 result and the series is only 1-0. My comment state that the JAZZ actually were able to do what you did not expect them to do in Game 2. May mali ba sa mga sinulat ko? So ano ang pinuputak mong I did not understand your post? Again, as I have repeatedly challenge you, show me FACTS to prove otherwise. Until now wala ka pa din maipakita sa akin to support your accusations. Stop kidding me. Obvious na this is another one of your ESCAPE ACT.-Haha! Man oh man. You really are obsessed in getting even. Use your real nick peithe. Sinsuspend ba kaya hindi mo magamit? Again, I'll stress out that it is my analysis. Problema sayo, lahat ng post ko kinokontra mo para lang makabawi sa akin. I suggest that you stop yackking ... nag self distruct ka na. Wag ka na mag reply kasi puros palusot ka na naman or hihirit ka lang ng personal attacks para malihis sa issue. Let's end this topic.-On the contrary, you're the one who's self-destructing. These posts only show na gusto mong makabawi sa akin coz parati kang napapahiya. Just what I expected (in BOLD), personal attacks na naman ang pangontra mo ... Hayyyy sumagot ka pa ... wala naman katuturan. Obvious ur trying to wiggle around the situation and just want to have the final say. But that won't happen as long as you continue to comment on my post. dog s@%t, alam ko naman na analysis mo yan. As you said I should make my own analysis and that is just what i did. I made one and it counters your analysis. Ikaw ang affected kasi you can't get over it. Worst you can't even substantiate your own argument. Quote Link to comment
zagan Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 ^Care to share your own analysis since you're so knowledgeable in basketball? no need. not because i am more knowledgeable in basketball than you, i am obligated to share my analysis. your analyes remind me of a famous Plato quote: “Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.” Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 no need. not because i am more knowledgeable in basketball than you, i am obligated to share my analysis. your analyes remind me of a famous Plato quote: “Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.”And I would say you are the latter and I am the former. Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 ame='megalodon' date='22 April 2010 - 11:47 PM' timestamp='1271951264' post='7356564'] Just what I expected (in BOLD), personal attacks na naman ang pangontra mo ...- Hayyyy sumagot ka pa ... wala naman katuturan. Obvious ur trying to wiggle around the situation and just want to have the final say. But that won't happen as long as you continue to comment on my post. dog s@%t, alam ko naman na analysis mo yan. As you said I should make my own analysis and that is just what i did. I made one and it counters your analysis. Ikaw ang affected kasi you can't get over it. Worst you can't even substantiate your own argument.Syempre ayaw mo magpatalo although obvious naman na olats ka na. I just made an analysis and you're the only one who cared to challenge my analysis which is valid and logical. I mean if Okur ain't there, the Nuggets will surely clog the lane with their big men. Ganun talaga pag nababara parati sa akin. You're so obsessed with getting even with me that you challenge my posts even if there is nothing to challenge. Hirit ka pa aso. Quote Link to comment
webslinger Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 game 3 bukas... si kover ang x-factor ng jazz pag mainit ito kahit sino itapat sa kanya walang magagawa... he he he..... Quote Link to comment
jerpau Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 sana kayanin ng denver ang utah since less na ang super stars nila.. Quote Link to comment
CELTS Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Syempre ayaw mo magpatalo although obvious naman na olats ka na. I just made an analysis and you're the only one who cared to challenge my analysis which is valid and logical. I mean if Okur ain't there, the Nuggets will surely clog the lane with their big men. Ganun talaga pag nababara parati sa akin. You're so obsessed with getting even with me that you challenge my posts even if there is nothing to challenge. Hirit ka pa aso. Simpleng tanong para tumigil na ang usapang "ayaw magpatalo" na ito ... Ang pi-nost ko po e about game 2, wherein I presented that the Nuggets were not able to do what you expect then to do. Did I ever say that your opinion is invalid or illogical? Wag mo na paikutin...sabi ko naman if i do you injustice sa post ko present me FACTS that counters the Facts I presented to you when I claim that The Nuggets were not able to do as you expect them to do in Game 2. If you can do that i will issue an APOLGY ... wag po tayo defensive at balat sibuayas dito ...wag mo na ulit uliting sabihing barado ako sa iyo samantalang ang hamon ko di mo masagot. Quote Link to comment
zagan Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 And I would say you are the latter and I am the former. statements like this show your foolishness, my dear friend. all you do in this board is yak. Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 (edited) statements like this show your foolishness, my dear friend. all you do in this board is yak. On the contrary, that's what you do. I just did a simple analysis and you say that my analysis is for people who don't know their basketball. I asked you to share an analysis and you couldn't even give one. Tama ba peithe aka Celts aka zagan? Edited April 24, 2010 by megalodon Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 Lethargic play by the Nuggets in game 3. I guess this has something to do with Coach K's absence. AD doesn't really motivate the Nuggets the way Coach K does. I guess game 3 will go to Utah. Quote Link to comment
dencio Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 No Memo, no problem! Jazz' exceptional shooting continues as they hit 7 3s on 39% shooting from long distance and 47% overall. Millsap shoots 11-14 even with Denver's big men clogging the lane. Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 No Memo, no problem! Jazz' exceptional shooting continues as they hit 7 3s on 39% shooting from long distance and 47% overall. Millsap shoots 11-14 even with Denver's big men clogging the lane. The Nuggets simply sucked in this game. No energy. The Jazz, on the other hand, have been playing like a wounded tiger. Quote Link to comment
zagan Posted April 24, 2010 Share Posted April 24, 2010 No Memo, no problem! Jazz' exceptional shooting continues as they hit 7 3s on 39% shooting from long distance and 47% overall. Millsap shoots 11-14 even with Denver's big men clogging the lane. i guess someone's analysis did not happen and once again, proven wrong. may palusot pa na "no energy" and "playing like a wounded tiger". his opinions are the ones always clogged. in tagalog, barado. Quote Link to comment
FF Posted April 24, 2010 Author Share Posted April 24, 2010 Lethargic play by the Nuggets in game 3. I guess this has something to do with Coach K's absence. AD doesn't really motivate the Nuggets the way Coach K does. I guess game 3 will go to Utah. truly my friend. if you see dantley he looks completely clueless and helpless. players and teams don't need to be coached when they're playing well ... it's when they're behind that the coach earns his keep. No Memo, no problem! Jazz' exceptional shooting continues as they hit 7 3s on 39% shooting from long distance and 47% overall. Millsap shoots 11-14 even with Denver's big men clogging the lane. the game 2 win injected the jazz with a big dose of vitamin C (as in confidence). yun naman ang nawala sa denver kanina. millsap was outstanding in leading the jazz back when boozrer and dwill were watching on the bench. The Nuggets simply sucked in this game. No energy. The Jazz, on the other hand, have been playing like a wounded tiger. dude the nuggets should be winning the series going away. utah is just a bit more mentally tough. coach karl used to be the rudder that steered denver back on course when the team's gone astray. but with his leadership gone denver's composure easily cracks under pressure. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.