agentjackbauer Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 yeah, too hard to maintain the FG% and FT%... and it's not i have okafor or a least, i have kevin garnett playing to pile up the blks... you win commish... period! Your style of donwplaying your chances is working bro Panalo ka na! You are now up in blocks with Darko giving you 5 in today's game. Congrats bro!!! Quote Link to comment
PrettyboyPOPOY Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 (edited) Parang matat*e ako sa excitement at suspense ng labanang gwapogs at commish! 6-5 in favor of commish. Pero Pero Pero pwedeng magbago dahil ang magiging championship point decider would be the FG%. Naglalaro pa si Odom kay commish at si Walton kay Gwapogs, .7% lang ang lamang ni commish! Hawak bayan! Hehehehehe! Commish, yung championship round natin sa kabila biglang gumanda nakahabol ako 5-6! Pero sure ka na dun. Congrats! (edit)Side note, parang matat*e at masusuka rin ako sa laban ng LAKERS ko.Kelangan nila manalo to clinch a playoff spot. T*ngna kasing Sonics to eh, ayaw pang ibigay ang LABAN! Sumuko na kayo. Leeeeeccchhh!!! Edited April 16, 2007 by PrettyboyPOPOY Quote Link to comment
PrettyboyPOPOY Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Champion na si commish!Damn!Congrats. What makes it more special, champion din siya sa kabilang league! Damn! Fantasy Basketball Guru is that you? Hehehehehehe! Congrats! It was a GREAT YEAR of Fantasy Baketball co-GMs.Looking forward to next year to dethrone this agentjackbauer! Hahahhahahaha! Peace Out! Quote Link to comment
PrettyboyPOPOY Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 (edited) Hehehehhee! WOW MALI na naman pala ako! Hanggang sa 18 pa pala ang FINALS! Hahahhahaa! Sorry guys!!!! Lamang pa lang pala si commish 6-5! Bwisit!!!! Edited April 16, 2007 by PrettyboyPOPOY Quote Link to comment
agentjackbauer Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 (edited) Ha ha, oo pare up to 18 April pa:-) I got this weird feeling I will end up losing both leagues. And the scary part about this is, Im usually right with my gut feel.:-( Edited April 16, 2007 by agentjackbauer Quote Link to comment
chad_moneyshot Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 kayang-kaya ni hoops yan... Oo nga hoops... kaw nalang commish ng d-league next season! Quote Link to comment
agentjackbauer Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 Uh-oh, di na naman naglaro si Tony Parker. Sigh. Quote Link to comment
agentjackbauer Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 Gwaps, If you win the fg%, you win our match-up. PBP, If you win the ft%, you win our match-up. Lakas talaga ng gut feel ko na matatalo ako in both match-ups.Kahit isang panalo lang sana ok na. Quote Link to comment
agentjackbauer Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 (edited) Di rin naglalaro si Francisco Garcia:-( Edit: Oops, I spoke too soon. Naglalaro na pala, he he Edited April 17, 2007 by agentjackbauer Quote Link to comment
hoopburners Posted April 18, 2007 Author Share Posted April 18, 2007 Congrats Blankface & Jumpman! meron pa D-League next year! ===D-Leaguers.. gawin natin si Uncuts or hoops ang commish.. Oks ba? medyo busy na sa training kaya "inactive' ako sa pag-post. kayang-kaya ni hoops yan... Oo nga hoops... kaw nalang commish ng d-league next season! naku.. flattered naman ako dito.. wag nyo namang ipilit, baka seryosohin ko yan.. heheh seriously, basta may d-league ok ako jan.. yung commish, si fatso muna unless magkaroon ng vote (daanin natin sa magandang sistema.. heheh). pero kung ako maging commish, required kayong lahat makipag-trade sa akin.. hehe jok lang.. peace! oist, congrats bro gwaps at commish ajb.. kahit sino manalo sa inyo pareho pa rin kayong winners... :cool: Quote Link to comment
bubuy Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 still 8-3 in favor of David Stern. but 3 stats are very close. FG% - .0013PTM - 2BLK - 1 Quote Link to comment
gift_of_game Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 Current read: Head-to-Head Uncertainty Principle; "No Collusion, No Veto Policy"Authoring: Principles of the Trade and Veto: Not only a supply & demand issue -->care to enlighten us on these perceptions bro? :cool: Quote Link to comment
Cal! Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 ganda talaga finals ng league.. lupet!! congrats to a very successful league.. until next season.. Quote Link to comment
bubuy Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 Current read: Head-to-Head Uncertainty Principle; "No Collusion, No Veto Policy"Authoring: Principles of the Trade and Veto: Not only a supply & demand issue -->care to enlighten us on these perceptions bro? :cool: Here is the H2H Uncertainty Principle. And I found out about it when we were already mid-season in our NBA league. I was punting the BLKs cat and as per this principle it was never a good idea. But hey, it nearly worked for me. The Head-to-Head Uncertainty Principle In quantum theory, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle tells us that the more precisely we know a particle's position the less precisely we know its velocity, and vice versa. This has something to do with photons and wavelengths and the characteristics of very tiny things. But you probably didn't come here to get tips for your fantasy quantum physics league. So let's get to baseball. The head-to-head uncertainty principle tells us that when the season is parsed into week-long slices, we can't accurately predict any individual player's performance. It's only seven days. Baseball is a game in which it literally takes years for a player's true ability to express itself. Over a full season, we can confidently say that Mariano Rivera will get 35 saves, Juan Pierre will steal 45 bases, Adam Dunn will hit 40 homers, and a healthy Chris Carpenter will win at least 15 games. But what will those guys do next week? Maybe nothing. Maybe a lot. None of them can guarantee you a win in any stat in a given week. If you want to regularly win a category, get multiple players who excel in that category. Redundancy is key. Don't simply rely on one player's proficiency in any given area. They won't distribute their stats evenly throughout the season. Nobody does that. Players tend to binge, then fast. To better understand the uncertainty principle, let's take a look at an elite base stealer. Carl Crawford led the American League in thefts last year with 58. He's a top-tier fantasy outfielder and a clear first-round pick. Basically, Crawford is to fantasy experts what the ACC is to Dick Vitale: an institution with mythic talent that cannot be overhyped. In roto leagues you can draft Crawford and feel confident that you've addressed stolen bases to a reasonable extent. No need to think much about them in your later picks, really. If you accidentally get a couple more league-average base stealers, you're no worse than middle of the pack. But head-to-head leagues are trickier. You can't lean on any individual player too heavily. Take a look at Crawford's stolen base totals from April 2006: Week One: 1 SBWeek Two: 2 SBWeek Three: 1 SBWeek Four: 2 SB Useful, sure. But two stolen bases are never enough to win the category. If you don't have other sources for steals, you lose. Crawford did have an eight-steal week in May, though. That was probably more than enough to win the week. Later in the year he posted a six-steal week and a five-steal week – that's a third of his total stolen bases in only three weeks, for those keeping score. After a three-steal game against Boston on July 5, Crawford stole exactly one base over his next 26 games. That's four weeks with only one steal. It happens. It's not unique to Crawford. He can certainly help you in head-to-head leagues, but don't expect him or anyone else to single-handedly deliver a bunch of category wins. That takes redundancy. If you're determined to control steals every week (which is kind of silly, because steals aren't strongly correlated with other categories), you need to draft multiple guys who are better than league average. Even though one guy by himself can't win a category very often, one guy is still better than no guy. Don't use the head-to-head uncertainty principle as justification to totally ignore a category in your league. That's never advisable. The "No collusion, no veto policy" employed in some fantasy leagues state that as long as there is no cheating (one team dumping his better players to another team), trades shouldn't be vetoed. The question of course is how to prove "pre-meditated" connivance between the two GMs. The one I'm authoring, I haven't finished yet. It's about the "NCNV Policy" and how it affects league balance or to put it properly league imbalance, 2 for 1 trades, when is the best time to make a trade, etc etc. :cool: Quote Link to comment
ayasadai Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 ganda talaga finals ng league.. lupet!!congrats to a very successful league.. until next season.. oist pre, isang araw na lang, hehehe! mukang masisilat kita this time! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.