dallas316 Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 patikim ng KAMAO! hehehe Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 patikim ng KAMAO! hehehe natikman na ni Marquez... napahiga siya sa lakas! Quote Link to comment
dallas316 Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 natikman na ni Marquez... napahiga siya sa lakas! wahehe tama malapit pa sa bunganga ni JMM haha Quote Link to comment
wizard23 Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Pacman already went on record today that he is moving up to 135 (lightweight division). He'll be fighting David Diaz next. If JMM wants a rematch, he must wait his turn and move up to the 135 lbs division. Pacman dictates the terms. He gets to choose whom to fight, when to fight, at what division to fight. yup. after all, he has proven himself. he has the swagger and the bragging rights to dictate on his own terms. Quote Link to comment
boy anis Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 MAgkano kaya nakuha ni MP lahat lahat na? :upside: Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 wag ka na mag-compute... magagalit yung haters na hindi nababalatuhan... Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 nasa $5M++ sssshhh... Quote Link to comment
boy anis Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 wag ka na mag-compute... magagalit yung haters na hindi nababalatuhan... Talaga? meron kasi nakapagsabi sa akin abot 300m o lagpas pa daw converted na un to peso kasama na din daw ung share nya sa mp promotions at hbo etc... Quote Link to comment
betloger Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 si rep. joson daw magpapasa ng bill sa kongreso na magbabawal ng contact sports dito sa pinas meaning yung boxing eh gusto nya ipagbawal dito sa pinas. napakabobo namang kongresman na yan pati ba naman boxing eh papakialaman nya maging kasing sikat lang sya ni pacman. napaka ipokrito ng pakingshet na yan samantalang sa nueva ecija eh nakikipagpatayan lahi nila makaupo lang sa konseho. napakalaking kalokohan ang iniisip ng gagew. Quote Link to comment
howard_the_duck Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 (edited) eh di dapat bawal na rin ang sabong sa nueva ecija... daming sabungan doon :evil: kawawa naman ang mga kapatid kong chickens Edited March 25, 2008 by howard_the_duck Quote Link to comment
0range1 Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 I did not attack him based on his national origin. Did I? I said he was Sri Lankan. Statement of fact. Is that racial discrimination? No. I said he was "s@%t". Statement of opinion. I am entitled to it. Honestly, I think you are a big FCUKING moron. I am sure I explained it very clearly that what you said was a racial slur, then you come back to me with this shyt? What do you mean he was Sri Lankan, leave the being a "Sri Lankan" out of the way. Who the hell care of where he came from or what is his place of origin. We are talking of Boxing period. LOL. And you say you are a writer? You can't even comprehend simple stuff. You are naive and clearly ignorant. You are childish and stupid at being argumentative. I have wasted my time with you. :sleepysmiley03: Quote Link to comment
bret_hart Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 si rep. joson daw magpapasa ng bill sa kongreso na magbabawal ng contact sports dito sa pinas meaning yung boxing eh gusto nya ipagbawal dito sa pinas. napakabobo namang kongresman na yan pati ba naman boxing eh papakialaman nya maging kasing sikat lang sya ni pacman. napaka ipokrito ng pakingshet na yan samantalang sa nueva ecija eh nakikipagpatayan lahi nila makaupo lang sa konseho. napakalaking kalokohan ang iniisip ng gagew. narinig ko nga to nung isang araw. isa to sa pinaka-abnormal na bagay na nadinig ko! hoy joson! kung nagbabasa ka man dito, madami pang bagay ang dapat mong pagtuunan ng pansin! wag kang gumawa ng bagay para mapansin ka lang kahit nagmumukha kang gago sa mga pinag-gagawa mo! buset! Quote Link to comment
wd_400 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 yang si joson halata na nagpapapansin lang. tatakbo yatang senador yang ulul na yan. :thumbsdownsmiley: Quote Link to comment
robbietan Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 (edited) ronnie nathanielz was one bum who became a pinoy becuz of his closeness to the marcoses. his 'citizenship' was the result of a presidential decree (#192). hindi ka na magtataka kung pati sa boxing ay hindi nakikita ang pagiging 'pinoy' nya. isa pa itong si recah. next to imposible (daw) na makakita ng 'objective' pinoy na magsasabing talo si marquez. na 'divided' ang boxing world sa title fight ni pacquiao. naman, anlakas ng loob ng taong ito, considering that he probably never fought a single round of boxing in the ring. kung gusto ni recah na manalo ang fighter na mas maraming suntok ei di mag olympics na lang shah. kahit suntok lamok may iskor sa olympics. sa pros, panalo sa isang round ang boxer kapag napabagsak ang kalaban after 3 blows, kesa sa kalaban nya na nakatama ng 30 blows pero pitik langgam lang. divided? magikot shah sa america at doon shah magtanong kung divided sila doon. after the judges made their decision, there was no 'division' in the WBC and in the atlanta boxing commission. they recorded it as a pacqui win. period. donaire? I was laughing my guts out when I heard his 'comments'. stick to boxing for the meantime, kid you aint ready yet. just remember you turned your back on darchinyan during your bout before making comments on another boxer's bout. kung buhay lang si joe cantada, mas maniniwala ako sa comments niya. the guy may be a laughable basketball commentator but he sure knows boxing. Edited March 26, 2008 by robbietan Quote Link to comment
robbietan Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 joson? sa dami ng taong pinapatay ng pamilya nya sa NE anlakas ng loob nyang mag ban ng boxing. gusto siguro nya BARILAN na lang ang sports, tapos pamilya nya lang ang may bala sa baril. what a laugh. kung sa italy at sa vatican city, hindi banned ang boxing. talo pa nya ang mga holy prayle. buti sana kung santo shah. Quote Link to comment
loudchild Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 joson? sa dami ng taong pinapatay ng pamilya nya sa NE anlakas ng loob nyang mag ban ng boxing. gusto siguro nya BARILAN na lang ang sports, tapos pamilya nya lang ang may bala sa baril. what a laugh. kung sa italy at sa vatican city, hindi banned ang boxing. talo pa nya ang mga holy prayle. buti sana kung santo shah. eo rin sinabi ko nung nakita ko sa news to. Kulugo pala tong ungas na to e. tapos ng laht ng buhay na inutang magpropromote ng non-violence. Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 (edited) Go Manny Pacman Pacquiao! Mabuhay ka! Mabuhay ang Pilipinas! Edited March 26, 2008 by Legionnaire Quote Link to comment
Mike_Lowrey21 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 I have said enough about the fyt and will not go back and forth about it. Re: Ronnie Nathanielz. Yes, it is discrimination if you attack him by basis of his ethnic or national origin. This aspect has nothing to do with Boxing (our topic at hand), it is more of a low blow at personal attack. If you wish to criticize RN, you can do so. I must say though that trying to discredit him by pointing out his origin is thinking backwards, and distasteful. Discrimination is an attitude against another simply becos that person comes from somewhere else or belongs to another group. So you asking if a pinoy calling another pinoy is discriminatory? It is not. Same as black homies calling another 'niggers'. It is not the same for whites to call blacks "niggers' though right? That is the same with you calling RN Sri Lankan. That is simply racist and insulting, and of course we dont want to do that. You will understand all of this when you go abroad and when you are discriminated yourself. Now, I understand your comments against RN stemmed out from the rumours that he hurled against Manny. They may or may not be true. Let me just say this, RN is a man who has done alot of contributions not only for Philippine Boxing, but also for the whole of Philippine Sports. He is an addition to the lack of sports contributors d2 satin. Hopefully, we stop alienating and treating him like second class. He did an honest to goodness work on Paq-Marquez 2 anyway. sensya na po kung off topic ah pero kamag-anak mo ba si bombay aka ronnie? kUNG ALAM MO ANG HISTORY ng taong ito bago pa naging pinoy eh hindi ka siguro magtatanggol sa kamoteng ito. ilang taon ka na ba totoy? oo baka manong ako sa paningin mo pero madami akong alam ke bombay at kinamumuhian ito sa pba. kapit tuko lang iyan sa pba para hindi siya mawalan ng trabaho. tapos me ginawa sa sports? ano? alam mo ba talaga history mo sa taong ito? sa sports? hindi ako sportswriter pero sabihin na natin me kontak ako sa bombay na ito at kampon ni makoy yan. bumalimbing lang para hindi mawala dito sa pinas. kaya wag mong sabihing madaming alam yan sa sports. sensha na po off topic na. pero sa tingin ko panalo si pacquiao. kung sa basketball, buzzer-beater yung knockdown niya ke marquez. ganun ka dikit. kaya hindi nga matanggap ni marquez. at ng ibang pinoy dito. kakatuwa din madaming pinoy galit ke pacquiao. hehehe crab mentality nga naman. kung ang diyos nga hindi makuha lahat ng tao sa mundo sa pananampalataya sa kanya, si pacquiao pa kaya? kahit ke Jordan madaming galit din sa kanya. kaya hayaan mo na lang yung mga nagsasabing talo daw si pacquiao. nagpapapansin lang naman iyan eh kumagat kayo napikon kayo eh ni panalo sila hehe pero hindi ko talaga mapalagpas iyang pagtatanggol ke bombay nathanielsz na yan. kung kamag-anak ka ni bombay, pasensya na pero madaming baho yan hindi lang alam ng madami. Quote Link to comment
djrs Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 sensha na po off topic na. pero sa tingin ko panalo si pacquiao. kung sa basketball, buzzer-beater yung knockdown niya ke marquez. ganun ka dikit. kaya hindi nga matanggap ni marquez. at ng ibang pinoy dito. pati po yung paghawak nya sa rope dapat knockdown 2 po iyon so automatic 10-7 round 3 dapat! pero di napansin ni Ref. Bayless! tapos yung LOW BLOW! sa 10th round pinagpahinga si pacman(mandatory rest pag nakatanggap ng low blow) morethan 4-5 low blow pero no POINT DEDUCTIOn!! tapos sasabihin nila talo si pacman? mas aggresive si pacman... mas marami binitawan na suntok pati jabs si pacman! Quote Link to comment
bret_hart Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 Natahanielsz has always hated Filipino boxers, so hindi na bago sa kanya ang mag-comment against Manny. kaya sila di magkasundo ni Quinito eh, si Quinito pro-Pinoy fighters at si Natahanielsz naman anti-Pinoy fighters... Quote Link to comment
uaeboy25 Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 nakakatawa tayo talaga. sa opis 2 pinoy na kaopismeyt ko ang nagdebate. kasi ung isa panalo daw si pacman. kinakatyawan namin. ehto nakipagdebate sya sa isang opismeyt ko na naniniwalang panalo si pacman. ung boss namin na marunong ng magtagalog at kakabisita lang sa pinas last month. kilala nya(ng bos namin) si pacman. panay ang banat ng kabayan natin na si pacman daw mayabang. saka puro daw kasi pelikula ang inatupag kaya hindi nanalo. ehto na pinakelaman na nga yung 2 kabayan natin na nagdedebate. sabi ng boss namin. "if he los u complain, if he win you complain. how about you what did you do for your country? drinking? always change mobile for fashion?" may point sya daming meron na magaling lang magcomment. sakin kahit walang rematch. sabi nga ni quinito parang 2-0 na ang kartada pabor kay pacman. sa unang laban may judge na sinabing nagkamali sya ng sulat ng scorecard. pero kasi base sa rules hindi pwedeng bawiin ang naunang score. pero lumalabas panalo si pacman. sa rematch although close nanalo si pacman via split decision. so ano pa nginangalngal ni marquez? 2 si pacman bokya sya. rematch? decision na yun nung nanalo. respect na lang natin. busy booking nya daming gusto mag paschedule. valero, 2 diaz, casamayor, catsidis, raheem, kahit si delahoya at si hatton nagkaka interes so kung ako kay pacman last optoin ko si marquez. Quote Link to comment
bret_hart Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 nakakatawa tayo talaga. sa opis 2 pinoy na kaopismeyt ko ang nagdebate. kasi ung isa panalo daw si pacman. kinakatyawan namin. ehto nakipagdebate sya sa isang opismeyt ko na naniniwalang panalo si pacman. ung boss namin na marunong ng magtagalog at kakabisita lang sa pinas last month. kilala nya(ng bos namin) si pacman. panay ang banat ng kabayan natin na si pacman daw mayabang. saka puro daw kasi pelikula ang inatupag kaya hindi nanalo. ehto na pinakelaman na nga yung 2 kabayan natin na nagdedebate. sabi ng boss namin. "if he los u complain, if he win you complain. how about you what did you do for your country? drinking? always change mobile for fashion?" may point sya daming meron na magaling lang magcomment. sakin kahit walang rematch. sabi nga ni quinito parang 2-0 na ang kartada pabor kay pacman. sa unang laban may judge na sinabing nagkamali sya ng sulat ng scorecard. pero kasi base sa rules hindi pwedeng bawiin ang naunang score. pero lumalabas panalo si pacman. sa rematch although close nanalo si pacman via split decision. so ano pa nginangalngal ni marquez? 2 si pacman bokya sya. rematch? decision na yun nung nanalo. respect na lang natin. busy booking nya daming gusto mag paschedule. valero, 2 diaz, casamayor, catsidis, raheem, kahit si delahoya at si hatton nagkaka interes so kung ako kay pacman last optoin ko si marquez. i have to agree with your boss... ang hirap kse di na lang tayo matuwa sa achievement ng kapwa natin. sa bagay ganun talaga, di mawawala ang mga detractors at mga inggitero. Quote Link to comment
uaeboy25 Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 may mali sa post ko kinakatyawan namin ung isang kababayan namin na panay ang banat kay pacman. naniniwala sya na panalo si marquez. anyway baka off topic na ton. about ronnie natanniels. hindi pwedeng hindi pag usapan ang origin nya. kasi un ang magiging basehan natin kung bakit ganun ang paniniwala nya. sa journalism maraming aspect yan. kaya naman pala madalang sya magtagalog kasi hindi sya purong filipino. teka wag natin kainitan ang pagsasalita ng origins nya. racism? kahit saan meron nyan. nasa pagtanggap lang yan. kung ayaw natin ng racism malaking problem yan. tayo na mismo biktima ng racism. kung ayaw natin nya ipaalis natin ang passport isa sa bigmove yan. pagpasok palang ng airport biktima na tayo nyan. pag kano konting requirements ang hinhingi pagkakita palang ng passport. hindi ba racism un? kung totoong sri lankan si ronnie nataniels bakit may magagalit. tingin ko ang dapat ereklamo is kung may nadeprived sa isang tao based sa nationality nya. i think hindi nadeprived si nathaniels. an totoo nga panay parin ang gamit nya ng media kahit hindi narereview mga articles nya. Quote Link to comment
the_joker Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 Tutuwad-tuwad na naman si lito atienza at chavit singson kay pacquiao makahingi lang ng balato... pati bayag ni manny sisipsipin ng mga ulupong na ito eh hehehe Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.