Jump to content


Photo

MTC Legal Thread

legal advice

  • Please log in to reply
12322 replies to this topic

#12301 rocco69

rocco69

    Libertine

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts

Posted 29 August 2019 - 01:51 AM

Good day po Sir. If a lease contract is about to expire and the lessee said that he vacated the unit already with his things but the security of the building said that there are still some belongings left. What if, the lessee didn't remove all of his belongings at the end of the contract even after reminding him a day or two before the contract ends to remove all his belongings. Can we remove the belongings ourselves and just leave it at security for him to pick up at a later time? Is that legal? What's the best way to deal with this? It would be a hassle to clean the unit if the belongings are still there and more so if someone wants to occupy the unit already.

call up/inform the lessee that there are still belongings there and then give him a reasonable period w/in which to remove, and that failure to do so within the period given will result in all property left being deposited with the security for him to pick up.

 

Have someone from the barangay (if possible)  witness the removal of the things (make an inventory of the things removed, to be signed by you an the witness)



#12302 charliehouse

charliehouse

    Charmer

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 428 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 September 2019 - 07:57 AM

In the light sa ongoing issue ngayon na paglaya ni Sanchez, i've read several articles na nagsasabing ang isang convict ay may civil punishment rin civil interdiction yata ang tawag kung saan hindi siya pwedeng bumoto o gumawa ng kontrata.

Tanong lang sir for curiousity lang, kung makakalaya ba ang isang bilanggo, automatic ba na mawawala ang civil interdiction?

Kung makakalaya si Sanchez according to GCTA, pwede na ba siyang bumoto at gumawa ng kontrata agad-agad?

#12303 Mc Travis

Mc Travis

    Virgin

  • (04) Casual
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 September 2019 - 09:05 PM

In the light sa ongoing issue ngayon na paglaya ni Sanchez, i've read several articles na nagsasabing ang isang convict ay may civil punishment rin civil interdiction yata ang tawag kung saan hindi siya pwedeng bumoto o gumawa ng kontrata.
Tanong lang sir for curiousity lang, kung makakalaya ba ang isang bilanggo, automatic ba na mawawala ang civil interdiction?
Kung makakalaya si Sanchez according to GCTA, pwede na ba siyang bumoto at gumawa ng kontrata agad-agad?

Ang civil interdiction ay isang Accessory Penalty naka kabit ito sa, as the term suggests, Principal penalty. Mawawala ito oras na ma-extinguish ang kanyang Criminal liability. Kaya't oras na makalaya ang isang tao sa pagkakabilanggo sa mga dahilan tulad ng service of sentence, extinguished na ang kanyang Criminal liability sa parehong Principal at accessory penalties.

Maga-apply ba ito kay Sanchez? Questionable pa kasi kung applicable ba talaga sa kanya ang GCTA. May mga bumabasa ng batas at nagiinterpret na hindi applicable ang GCTA sa persons convicted of heinous crimes. May mga nagsasabi ding applicable sa lahat ang GCTA. SC lang ang makakapag sabi.

Kung applicable, para sa akin, wala nang civil interdiction dahil fully extinguished na ang criminal liability. Kung hindi applicable, may tanong pa diyan kung pwede pa ba siyang arestuhin o ikulong. Maari man o hindi na, magpapatuloy pa din ang civil interdiction.

#12304 oliverjohnholmes

oliverjohnholmes

    gemini man

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 198 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:it's the journey...

Posted 20 September 2019 - 04:39 AM

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?



#12305 rocco69

rocco69

    Libertine

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts

Posted 23 September 2019 - 01:02 PM

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?

Kung gusto mong magibg kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 years old a



#12306 rocco69

rocco69

    Libertine

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts

Posted 23 September 2019 - 01:33 PM

Kung gusto mong magibg kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 years old a

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?

Kung gusto mong maging kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 YEARS OLD ANG AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS!

 

Ito rin ang makikita mo kapag iyo itong hinanap sa Google.

 

NGUNIT, SUBALIT, DATAPWAT...

 

Ito ay isang simplistikong pag-aaral ng batas, base lamang sa pagbabasa ng Republic Act 8353 (na di na isinalang-alang at inalala ang iba pang batas na may kaugnayan dito!).

 

Ayon sa RA 8353:

 

Article 266-A. Rape: When And How Committed. - Rape is committed:

"1) By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:

"a) Through force, threat, or intimidation;

"b) When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious;

"c) By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and

"d) When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of age or is demented, even though none of the circumstances mentioned above be present.

 

Dahil sinasabi sa RA 8353 na kapag ang offended party ay below 12 yrs, rape na, kahit wala yung ibang bagay bagay na kailangan para sa rape, IBIG DAW SABIHIN, 12 nga ang edad para legal nang makipagsiping ang isang babae sa lalaki.

 

Ating alalahanin na ang edad ng hustong gulang sa Pilipinas ay 18 (RA 6809). Dahil dito, ipinapalagay ng batas na walang kapangyarihan magdesisyon para sa sarili niya ang menor-de-edad.

 

Ayon din sa RA 7610:

 

Section 5. Child Prostitution and Other Sexual Abuse.Children, whether male or female, who for money, profit, or any other consideration or due to the coercion or influence of any adult, syndicate or group, indulge in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct, are deemed to be children exploited in prostitution and other sexual abuse.

The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua shall be imposed xxx   xxx   xxx

 

Sa madaling salita, ang batang nakipagtalik dahil sa impluwensya ng isang nasa hustong gulang ay ipinapalagay na "child exploited in other sexual abuse," at maaaring masentesyahan ang nasa hustong gulang ng reclusion temporal medium hanggang reclusion perpetua (14 years, 8 months and 1 day to 30 years).

 

 

Hiwalay pa dito ang Article 337 at 338 ng Revised Penal Code:

 

 

Art. 337. Qualified seduction. — The seduction of a virgin over twelve years and under eighteen years of age, committed by any person in public authority, priest, home-servant, domestic, guardian, teacher, or any person who, in any capacity, shall be entrusted with the education or custody of the woman seduced, shall be punished by prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods.

The penalty next higher in degree shall be imposed upon any person who shall seduce his sister or descendant, whether or not she be a virgin or over eighteen years of age.chanrobles virtual law library

Under the provisions of this Chapter, seduction is committed when the offender has carnal knowledge of any of the persons and under the circumstances described herein.chanrobles virtual law library

 

(Ang ibig sabihin ng salitang "virgin" sa Art. 337 ay babaeng maganda/malinis ang reputasyon, hindi na ito ay literal na "birhen")

 

 

Art. 338. Simple seduction. — The seduction of a woman who is single or a widow of good reputation, over twelve but under eighteen years of age, committed by means of deceit, shall be punished by arresto mayor.chanrobles vi

 

Makikita mula sa Art. 337 at 338 na krimen pa rin ang pakikipagtalik sa babeng nasa edad 12 hanggang bago mag-18.

 

Alalahanin din na rape ang pag-aabuso ng kapangyarihan para makatalik ang isang babae (see Art. 266-A[c])

 

Maari mong gawing depensa na PUMAYAG AT WALANG PAMIMILIT ANG PAKIKIPAGTALIK MO SA BABAENG EDAD 12 - BELOW 18.

Pero, dahil wala pa nga itong kapasidad na magpasya para sa sarili (wala pa siya sa hustong gulang), pag gusto ng magulang magkaso ng rape, YARI KA!!! Dahil  walang bisa ang pagpayag nung babae (wala nga siyang kapasidad na magpasya pa). Palalabasin ng magulang na ang pakikipagtalik ay dahil sa impluwensya nung nasa edad, at presto... ito ay child exploited under other forms of sexual abuse na. YARI!!!

 

 

Kung kaya't masasabi natin na HINDI 12 ANG LEGAL AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS. ITO AY 18!!!

 

rtual law libry


Edited by rocco69, 23 September 2019 - 01:34 PM.

  • oliverjohnholmes likes this

#12307 putokmolang

putokmolang

    Experienced

  • (02) Sinless
  • PipPipPip
  • 26 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 September 2019 - 09:44 AM

Hello po mga boss, anyone here is familiar with the law regarding "Pamana"  and also "utang" of a person who suddenly died due to vehicular accident. Need some advice and consultation whats the right thing to do. Thanks in advance! 



#12308 rocco69

rocco69

    Libertine

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts

Posted 24 September 2019 - 02:37 PM

Hello po mga boss, anyone here is familiar with the law regarding "Pamana"  and also "utang" of a person who suddenly died due to vehicular accident. Need some advice and consultation whats the right thing to do. Thanks in advance! 

Ang utang ay hindi namamana (see Article 776, 777, Civil Code at Genato versus Bayhon, 596 SCRA 713).

 

Ang utang nung namatay ay dapat singilin ng nagpautang sa ari-ariang naiwan nung namatay, hindi sa mga tagapagmana nito.

 

Kaya't kung walang lupa na naka-rehistro sa pangalan ng namatay, o di-kaya'y sasakyan na nakarehistro sa pangalan nito, o shares of stock na nakapangalan dito, uuwi ng luhaan ang nagpautang (ano ang hahabulin niyang ari-arian? wala naman siyang ebidensya na ang alahas o appliances na naiwan nung namatay ay pag-aari nito, siyempre hindi rin ito aaminin nung mga tagapgmana).

 

Kapag may lupa, o sasakyan, yun ang maaaring habulin ng nagpautang (kung alam ng nagpautang, bakit rin ito ipapaalam ng mga tagapagmana, maghirap ang nagpautang na maghanap, tapos kailangan din niyang magsampa ng kaso sa korte para maghabol sa kanyang pautang).

 

malas lang ng mga tagapagmana kung ang lupa o kotse ay naka-mortgage, dahil maaari na itong habulin ng nagpautang sa pamamagitan ng pag-ilit nung lupa/sasakyan


Edited by rocco69, 24 September 2019 - 02:43 PM.


#12309 raikux

raikux

    Cutie

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 247 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2019 - 09:41 PM

Kung gusto mong maging kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 YEARS OLD ANG AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS!

 

Ito rin ang makikita mo kapag iyo itong hinanap sa Google.

 

NGUNIT, SUBALIT, DATAPWAT...

 

Ito ay isang simplistikong pag-aaral ng batas, base lamang sa pagbabasa ng Republic Act 8353 (na di na isinalang-alang at inalala ang iba pang batas na may kaugnayan dito!).

 

Ayon sa RA 8353:

 

Article 266-A. Rape: When And How Committed. - Rape is committed:

"1) By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:

"a) Through force, threat, or intimidation;

"b) When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious;

"c) By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and

"d) When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of age or is demented, even though none of the circumstances mentioned above be present.

 

Dahil sinasabi sa RA 8353 na kapag ang offended party ay below 12 yrs, rape na, kahit wala yung ibang bagay bagay na kailangan para sa rape, IBIG DAW SABIHIN, 12 nga ang edad para legal nang makipagsiping ang isang babae sa lalaki.

 

Ating alalahanin na ang edad ng hustong gulang sa Pilipinas ay 18 (RA 6809). Dahil dito, ipinapalagay ng batas na walang kapangyarihan magdesisyon para sa sarili niya ang menor-de-edad.

 

Ayon din sa RA 7610:

 

Section 5. Child Prostitution and Other Sexual Abuse.Children, whether male or female, who for money, profit, or any other consideration or due to the coercion or influence of any adult, syndicate or group, indulge in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct, are deemed to be children exploited in prostitution and other sexual abuse.

The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua shall be imposed xxx   xxx   xxx

 

Sa madaling salita, ang batang nakipagtalik dahil sa impluwensya ng isang nasa hustong gulang ay ipinapalagay na "child exploited in other sexual abuse," at maaaring masentesyahan ang nasa hustong gulang ng reclusion temporal medium hanggang reclusion perpetua (14 years, 8 months and 1 day to 30 years).

 

 

Hiwalay pa dito ang Article 337 at 338 ng Revised Penal Code:

 

 

Art. 337. Qualified seduction. — The seduction of a virgin over twelve years and under eighteen years of age, committed by any person in public authority, priest, home-servant, domestic, guardian, teacher, or any person who, in any capacity, shall be entrusted with the education or custody of the woman seduced, shall be punished by prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods.

The penalty next higher in degree shall be imposed upon any person who shall seduce his sister or descendant, whether or not she be a virgin or over eighteen years of age.chanrobles virtual law library

Under the provisions of this Chapter, seduction is committed when the offender has carnal knowledge of any of the persons and under the circumstances described herein.chanrobles virtual law library

 

(Ang ibig sabihin ng salitang "virgin" sa Art. 337 ay babaeng maganda/malinis ang reputasyon, hindi na ito ay literal na "birhen")

 

 

Art. 338. Simple seduction. — The seduction of a woman who is single or a widow of good reputation, over twelve but under eighteen years of age, committed by means of deceit, shall be punished by arresto mayor.chanrobles vi

 

Makikita mula sa Art. 337 at 338 na krimen pa rin ang pakikipagtalik sa babeng nasa edad 12 hanggang bago mag-18.

 

Alalahanin din na rape ang pag-aabuso ng kapangyarihan para makatalik ang isang babae (see Art. 266-A[c])

 

Maari mong gawing depensa na PUMAYAG AT WALANG PAMIMILIT ANG PAKIKIPAGTALIK MO SA BABAENG EDAD 12 - BELOW 18.

Pero, dahil wala pa nga itong kapasidad na magpasya para sa sarili (wala pa siya sa hustong gulang), pag gusto ng magulang magkaso ng rape, YARI KA!!! Dahil  walang bisa ang pagpayag nung babae (wala nga siyang kapasidad na magpasya pa). Palalabasin ng magulang na ang pakikipagtalik ay dahil sa impluwensya nung nasa edad, at presto... ito ay child exploited under other forms of sexual abuse na. YARI!!!

 

 

Kung kaya't masasabi natin na HINDI 12 ANG LEGAL AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS. ITO AY 18!!!

 

rtual law libry

 

Brother dapat may retainer ka na dito sa MTC. Hehehe. Great perspective re: legal age vis-a-vis the Seduction provisions in the RPC. I always thought that if some of the elements of seduction are not present such as deceit, abuse of confidence etc. malabo may kaso, yun pala halos parang technically below 18 narin ang statutory rape due to the "other sexual abuse" provision in 7610.



#12310 wildswans

wildswans

    Cutie

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 234 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 September 2019 - 04:53 PM

Good day po, Sir. I understand that it's a common practice for an employer to require employees/applicants to submit an NBI clearance but is it common or proper for an employer to ask for one every year? Thanks in advance!

#12311 rocco69

rocco69

    Libertine

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts

Posted 02 October 2019 - 10:48 PM

Good day po, Sir. I understand that it's a common practice for an employer to require employees/applicants to submit an NBI clearance but is it common or proper for an employer to ask for one every year? Thanks in advance!

it's not common. but it's proper. It is well within management prerogative to learn whether employees are conducting themselves properly.


Edited by rocco69, 02 October 2019 - 10:49 PM.


#12312 Stewart Gilligan Griffin

Stewart Gilligan Griffin

    Wanton

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Quahog, Rhode Island

Posted 06 October 2019 - 01:53 PM

Sir @rocco69

 

Nasa barko po ako ngayon at pwersahan po akong pinagtatrabaho nang dalawang position pero ang kontratang pinirmahan ko po ay para sa isang position lamang. Para po akong hostage dito dahil galing po ako saten bakasyon at pinasampa po ako sa barko sabay sabing gagawin mo tong trabaho nato at wala kang choice kundi mag quit o ituloy mo, pasalamat kana lang may trabaho ka.

 

Saan po ba ako pwedeng mag reklamo habang nasa barko ako at anong reklamo ang pwede kong ilaban sa kanila? Sumulat din po ako sa Norwegian Seafarers Union wala pa lang silang sagot baka sakaling matulungan nyo po ako Sir at mabigyan ng linaw sa aking mga gagawin.

 

Salamat po 



#12313 Rheinne

Rheinne

    Devirginized

  • (02) Sinless
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 October 2019 - 09:45 AM

Good morning po!

 

How does arrest works po ba? May arrest warrant po ba agad the moment n mag sampa ng kaso or demanda?



#12314 Rodriguez.mark

Rodriguez.mark

    Chaser

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 October 2019 - 09:42 PM



Not sure where to post this, this seems like a good thread. What are possible repercussions of being arrested/caught while in a spa?


Edited by Rodriguez.mark, 10 October 2019 - 09:44 PM.


#12315 rocco69

rocco69

    Libertine

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts

Posted 11 October 2019 - 06:46 PM

Sir @rocco69

 

Nasa barko po ako ngayon at pwersahan po akong pinagtatrabaho nang dalawang position pero ang kontratang pinirmahan ko po ay para sa isang position lamang. Para po akong hostage dito dahil galing po ako saten bakasyon at pinasampa po ako sa barko sabay sabing gagawin mo tong trabaho nato at wala kang choice kundi mag quit o ituloy mo, pasalamat kana lang may trabaho ka.

 

Saan po ba ako pwedeng mag reklamo habang nasa barko ako at anong reklamo ang pwede kong ilaban sa kanila? Sumulat din po ako sa Norwegian Seafarers Union wala pa lang silang sagot baka sakaling matulungan nyo po ako Sir at mabigyan ng linaw sa aking mga gagawin.

 

Salamat po 

ang tanong, 1) pareho din lang ba ang oras mo?

2) pareho ba ang sweldo ng dalawang posisyon na yan, o magkaiba?

3) ano ba ang posisyon mo? at ano yung isang pinapagawa din sa iyo?



#12316 Stewart Gilligan Griffin

Stewart Gilligan Griffin

    Wanton

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Quahog, Rhode Island

Posted 11 October 2019 - 11:22 PM

ang tanong, 1) pareho din lang ba ang oras mo? Halos parehas lang ng oras pero mas humaba dahil sa extra responsibilities

2) pareho ba ang sweldo ng dalawang posisyon na yan, o magkaiba? tatlong doble ng sahod ko ang kaibahan nung extra position na pinapagawa saken

3) ano ba ang posisyon mo? at ano yung isang pinapagawa din sa iyo? Guest Account Purser ako yung pinapagawa saken Financial Controller bale amo ko ang posisyon na yan kaso inalis na nang kompanya


Edited by Stewart Gilligan Griffin, 11 October 2019 - 11:25 PM.


#12317 rocco69

rocco69

    Libertine

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts

Posted 12 October 2019 - 11:48 PM

 

ang tanong, 1) pareho din lang ba ang oras mo? Halos parehas lang ng oras pero mas humaba dahil sa extra responsibilities

2) pareho ba ang sweldo ng dalawang posisyon na yan, o magkaiba? tatlong doble ng sahod ko ang kaibahan nung extra position na pinapagawa saken

3) ano ba ang posisyon mo? at ano yung isang pinapagawa din sa iyo? Guest Account Purser ako yung pinapagawa saken Financial Controller bale amo ko ang posisyon na yan kaso inalis na nang kompanya

 

Ah, pandaraya yan. basically hiring someone at a low rate, then making them work, for the same pay, on a job that should be paid more.

 

kailangan mo ng ebidensya na yan ang ginagawa sa iyo. Gumawa ka ng memo protesting that they are making you do a job that you were not hired for, ipa-receive mo sa kanila. Get other evidences also that they are making you work as Financial Controller, also evidence of the salary of a Financial Controller.

 

ito ay paglabag ng POEA rules (making the OFW perform work different from that in the contract, as well as changing the terms of the contract). pwede mo ito ireklamo sa POEA pag-uwi mo.



#12318 Stewart Gilligan Griffin

Stewart Gilligan Griffin

    Wanton

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Quahog, Rhode Island

Posted 13 October 2019 - 07:08 AM

Ah, pandaraya yan. basically hiring someone at a low rate, then making them work, for the same pay, on a job that should be paid more.

 

kailangan mo ng ebidensya na yan ang ginagawa sa iyo. Gumawa ka ng memo protesting that they are making you do a job that you were not hired for, ipa-receive mo sa kanila. Get other evidences also that they are making you work as Financial Controller, also evidence of the salary of a Financial Controller.

 

ito ay paglabag ng POEA rules (making the OFW perform work different from that in the contract, as well as changing the terms of the contract). pwede mo ito ireklamo sa POEA pag-uwi mo.

nag reklamo ako sa union ng seafarers nag padala sila nang form at pina fill up saken sinend ko na rin sa kanila.naghihintay na lang ako ng feedback as for the evidence ginagawa ko naman na ang trabaho talaga marami akong documents na maipapakita na ginagawa ko ang work pwede ko sila ireklamo sa POEA salamat po sa input Sir



#12319 charliehouse

charliehouse

    Charmer

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 428 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 October 2019 - 12:33 PM

Good day po sir/maam, may legal query lang po ako regarding po sa isang distant relative ko po... Ang distant relative ko po ay isang professional na napili as member ng PLEB o People's Legal Enforcement Board, tanong lang po, kung napili po siya as member ng PLEB need pa po ba siya ng authority to engage in a private practice po?



#12320 rocco69

rocco69

    Libertine

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 888 posts

Posted 16 October 2019 - 12:42 PM

Good day po sir/maam, may legal query lang po ako regarding po sa isang distant relative ko po... Ang distant relative ko po ay isang professional na napili as member ng PLEB o People's Legal Enforcement Board, tanong lang po, kung napili po siya as member ng PLEB need pa po ba siya ng authority to engage in a private practice po?

Mukhang hindi. Ayon sa Sec. 43© ng RA8551, ang membership sa PLEB ay isang "civic duty". Wala din itong sweldo, per diem at insurance coverage lang. Lumalabas na ito ay bahagi lamang ng responsibilidad ng isang mabuting mamamayan, at hindi ka nagiging bahagi ng Civil Service kung mapili ka na maging miyembro dito.

 

Dahil di ka naman bahagi ng Civil Service, maaari ka pa ring mag-engage sa private practice (wag lang sa mga bagay na may conflict of interest sa PLEB).


Edited by rocco69, 16 October 2019 - 12:43 PM.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users