pogi1119 Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 Hi, On my job offer, my prospective (a foreigner planning to open Phil. Office) employer asked me what I was getting from my previous employment with regards to Leaves. I then said 15 VL, 15 SL. Then employer accepted, hired me and gave sent me employment contract for my evaluation. Later on when I told him I'm about to sign, he then said not to sign 1st as he is drafting another one. Then came the bombshell, he reduced our previously agreed 15 VL, 15 SL to 5 VL, 5 SL. His defense, this is legal in terms on Phil. Labor law. When I countered what about what we agreed during the job offer, he answered that he was ignorant about Phil Labor Law at that time.. Now, my points:1. He agreed to my terms during the JO2. Its not my fault about his claimed ignorance. He should have researched in the 1st place.3. Now that he has made me resign from my previous job to join him, he is now "changing the rules" 4. As far as I know: Contract terms can come from a number of different sources; for example they could be: - verbally agreed - in a written contract, or similar document - in an employee handbook or on a company notice board in an offer letter from your employer So what now, do I have a legal or at least ethical basis to contend this unilateral employment contract modification, or I just have to suck this up? Note, that whatever happens to me will also be the same to my staff. And yes, I know the boss is a dick. But can I legally, ethically or at least logically fight this onslaught for my staff and myself? Thanks Quote Link to comment
virtuoso2022 Posted May 13, 2010 Share Posted May 13, 2010 If you wish to file a criminal case for Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Damage to Property before the Fiscal's Office, you can run after the driver only. The operator cannot be charged criminally. The operator can be held only civilly liable after the driver has been found guilty and is unable to pay. Matagal na proseso po ito. Moreover, the driver most likely will not have any money to pay you. If you wish, go after the operator directly by filing a civil case for damages against him in court. The operator will most likely try to settle. You have 2 options: (1) You can file a criminal case against the driver before the Fiscal's Office. You may be able to throw the driver in jail and run after the operator for damages only after the driver is found guilty. This will take a long time. (2) File a civil case against the operator directly in court. This process will be faster. I recommend the second option if you only plan to recover damages and not throw the driver in jail. thanks a lot mlpf...god bless Quote Link to comment
Arneeious Posted May 14, 2010 Share Posted May 14, 2010 Is there any complaint, civil or even criminal, that a wife can file against her husband's mistress without involving the husband? Quote Link to comment
mlpf Posted May 15, 2010 Share Posted May 15, 2010 Is there any complaint, civil or even criminal, that a wife can file against her husband's mistress without involving the husband? Sorry, if the wife wishes to file a criminal complaint for Concubinage, she has to include both the husband and his mistress. If the wife wishes to file a civil complaint for damages only, I think it is possible not to include the husband as a defendant. However, the wife may have a hard time proving her case without her husband's cooperation. Quote Link to comment
swami Posted May 15, 2010 Share Posted May 15, 2010 Is there any complaint, civil or even criminal, that a wife can file against her husband's mistress without involving the husband? Yap, a civil complaint for alienation of spouse's affection. I'm afraid a criminal complaint won't be possible without including the husband. Quote Link to comment
Arneeious Posted May 15, 2010 Share Posted May 15, 2010 Thank you for the replies. What kind of civil complaint can the wife file? Is there a specific case that can be filed against a homewrecker? Quote Link to comment
swami Posted May 17, 2010 Share Posted May 17, 2010 Thank you for the replies. What kind of civil complaint can the wife file? Is there a specific case that can be filed against a homewrecker? As I said, it's called "Complaint/Action for Alienation of Spouse's Affection". It's authorized by the provisions on Human Relations of the Civil Code. Quote Link to comment
MNdMud4s3x Posted May 17, 2010 Share Posted May 17, 2010 tanong po mga lawyers anu dapat gawin pag nagkamali ang entry sa birthc ertificate, male nalagay, female naman siya. anu po dapat gawin don. Quote Link to comment
Pinoymale Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 tanong po mga lawyers anu dapat gawin pag nagkamali ang entry sa birthc ertificate, male nalagay, female naman siya. anu po dapat gawin don. You have to file a Petition for Correction of Entry in the RTC in the city where the birth cert was registered. This is a simple case which shouldn't take too long to resolve. Quote Link to comment
freelicker Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Another alternative would be to go to your local civil registrar and have it corrected. There is a process where if the error is clearly just clerical, it can be corrected by mere affidavit. Quote Link to comment
Itto Ogami Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 good morning, GM-lawyers. simple question lang po:can a supermarket compel you to producea receipt of goods bought before youexit their premises? na-hassle lang ako kanina after buyingfrom SaveMore. the receipt was inside my wallet which was inside my bag. needless to say, it was quite a hassleto get it out. i read somewhere WalMart (US) had asimilar practice and consumers protestedagainst it. tia! Quote Link to comment
lomex32 Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 (edited) You may also visit LTFRB and file a formal complaint against the driver and operator LTFRB will summon them and they will be meted with suspensions for at least 2 months up to 6 months in this way mapapaaga ang areglo nila ... imagine no income for 2 months, impound vehicle bring your police reporthi sirs...i had a motorcyle accident last january with a taxi cab. it was established in the police report that it was the cab's fault becuase he counterflowed o my direction. Pero naawa ako sa taxi driver dahil mahirap ang buhay and he assisted me also papuntang hospital. hi promised me to pay for the damages,but nakiusap syang kung pwedeng hulugan monthly nlng ang pagbayad at least P500, dahil ayaw syang tulungan ng operator nya...gusto pa nga syang sisantehin dahil daw dun sa aksidente. my problem is..though he gave all his contact info including his address, nataguan na ata ako kse inde na sya macontact, at yung promise na nya idaan skin ang hulog (na mukha imposible nga) ay malabo na. ano kya mga sirs ang pwede kong legal move dito? can i also sue the operator? Edited May 19, 2010 by lomex32 Quote Link to comment
Pinoymale Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Another alternative would be to go to your local civil registrar and have it corrected. There is a process where if the error is clearly just clerical, it can be corrected by mere affidavit. I also thought this was another option but when I checked the law on administrative correction, it states: "Provided, however, That no correction must involve the change of nationality, age, status or sex of the petitioner."(sec. 2) Quote Link to comment
Pinoymale Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 good morning, GM-lawyers. simple question lang po:can a supermarket compel you to producea receipt of goods bought before youexit their premises? na-hassle lang ako kanina after buyingfrom SaveMore. the receipt was inside my wallet which was inside my bag. needless to say, it was quite a hassleto get it out. i read somewhere WalMart (US) had asimilar practice and consumers protestedagainst it. tia! I'm not aware of any law which prohibits this but I think it would be easy for supermarkets to justify this by saying that it's a reasonable safety measure to deter shoplifting. Quote Link to comment
Itto Ogami Posted May 23, 2010 Share Posted May 23, 2010 I'm not aware of any law which prohibits this but I think it would be easy for supermarkets to justify this by saying that it's a reasonable safety measure to deter shoplifting. thanks, master.i guess what pisses me off with this practiceis that it smacks of profiling (parang sa Arizona ). i don't see them doing it sa mga naka-posturera na shopperspero sa mga naka-pambahay lang na nagsa-shop sa kanila, eh,may discrimination sila. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.