legal Free Legal Advice

[Dr_PepPeR]

question lng.. batet di nasasagot ung ibang issues?

 

 

Or its a question by a law student who is too lazy to find out the answer by himself.

 

1. It is not a legal issue.

2. Answering and commenting on the issue would require time and effort to research.

3. The question concerning the issue is convoluted and cannot be understood.

4. The facts posted are incomplete.

5. It has been answered a few pages ago.

6. The issue is frivolous.

7. The answer is not known.

Edited March 11, 2010 by Wyld

[bryanfury]

Thank you sir, very much for the enlightenment. Last question, there's another problem expired na yung lease contract and it was never renewed, they refused to sign the renewal, after the tenants learned about the case.

 

Can we still impose the rent?

 

Thanks again in advance.

 

 

Thank you sir. Big help. Very much appreciated.

[lomex32]

Meron mga contract na implied ... at hindi na kailangan in writing

 

... pumasok ka sa SPA nagpa service

 

it is implied that you agree to the terms of service and payment of the establishment

 

 

Thank you sir. Big help. Very much appreciated.

[jayqbab]

To All MTC Lawyers in the forum. Many thanks for effort to enlighthen the minds of our fellow MTC'ers who have legal problems. I salute you for that. :mtc:

 

I also have a question that i would like to ask you and your team might be able to open up my mind for possible actions to be done.

 

- I am not married. Me and my girlfriend have a good understanding and we are blessed with a son.

- The parents of my girlfriend doesn't like me ( i think this is always the case)

- I am not living with my girlfriend, she was with her family during her pregnancy until she gave birth but I am supporting her financially.

- When our son was born, the mother of my girlfriend was the one doing all the paperworks in the hospital i.e. birth certificate, etc.

- My girlfriend told me that on the birth certificate, the family name that was registered in the certificate was the family name of her family - this was the action of her mother despite against her will because our agreement was that we will use my family name when the baby is born.

- We are still in close contact with my girlfriend and I am still supporting all her financial needs with our child and sometimes the needs of her family

 

My Questions:

- Is there a possibility that I can change the family name of my son with my family name?

- if yes, What are the actions and procedures that I need to do to have his birth certificate changed to my family name?

- What would be the timeline for it to be done.

- Is it expensive and time consuming? It really doesn't matter how much would it cost and for how long, i just want to be prepared for it.

 

I am looking forward to your advice.

 

I tried to read back over the thread if there is a case like mine but it is just too much toread back.

 

 

Thanks in advance :thumbsupsmiley:

[redax]

To All MTC Lawyers in the forum. Many thanks for effort to enlighthen the minds of our fellow MTC'ers who have legal problems. I salute you for that. :mtc:

 

I also have a question that i would like to ask you and your team might be able to open up my mind for possible actions to be done.

 

- I am not married. Me and my girlfriend have a good understanding and we are blessed with a son.

- The parents of my girlfriend doesn't like me ( i think this is always the case)

- I am not living with my girlfriend, she was with her family during her pregnancy until she gave birth but I am supporting her financially.

- When our son was born, the mother of my girlfriend was the one doing all the paperworks in the hospital i.e. birth certificate, etc.

- My girlfriend told me that on the birth certificate, the family name that was registered in the certificate was the family name of her family - this was the action of her mother despite against her will because our agreement was that we will use my family name when the baby is born.

- We are still in close contact with my girlfriend and I am still supporting all her financial needs with our child and sometimes the needs of her family

 

My Questions:

- Is there a possibility that I can change the family name of my son with my family name?

- if yes, What are the actions and procedures that I need to do to have his birth certificate changed to my family name?

- What would be the timeline for it to be done.

- Is it expensive and time consuming? It really doesn't matter how much would it cost and for how long, i just want to be prepared for it.

 

I am looking forward to your advice.

 

I tried to read back over the thread if there is a case like mine but it is just too much toread back.

 

 

Thanks in advance :thumbsupsmiley:

 

Under the implementing rules of RA 9255 you can just file an Affidavit to Use the Surname of the Father at the Local Civil Registry where your child was born.

For Births Previously Registered under the Surname of the Mother

 

7.2.1 If filiation has been expressly recognized by the father, the child shall use the surname

of the father upon the submission of the accomplished AUSF

4.1. The public document or AUSF executed within the Philippines shall be filed at the Local Civil Registry Office (LCRO) where the child was born, if the birth occurred within the Philippines.

[jayqbab]

Sir REDAX,

 

Many thanks for the advice. I will start the process soon.

 

Will update you sir.

 

:mtc:

[powerpuffgirls]

I would like to ask, if a person passes his bar examination, does he have the right automatically to have a notary public office? or if not, what does he need to do for him to have his own notary public office? TIA...

[rocco69]

hindi po, kahit pasado ka na sa bar, hindi ka pa abugado. nagiging abugado ka lang kapag nakapag-oath-taking ka na. abugado lang ang pwedeng maging notaryo.

 

pangalawa, hindi dahil abugado ka na ay pwede ka nang magnotaryo. kailangan mong maghain ng petisyon para maging notaryo publiko sa Executive Judge sa lugar kung saan mo gustong magnotaryo.

 

para sa mga requirement dito, tingnan mo ang "2004 Rule on Notarial Practice" at ito ang regulasyon para sa mga notaryo.

 

I would like to ask, if a person passes his bar examination, does he have the right automatically to have a notary public office? or if not, what does he need to do for him to have his own notary public office? TIA...

[equipped]

I would like to ask kung pwede pang ituloy ang processing ng kaso after 5 months. I made have a police report and medical cert. napirmahan na ng 2nd procecutor but hindi ko na dala sa fiscal kasi laging wala. I file the case in sta. cruz laguna im living in mandaluyong gusto ko sana ituloy ang kaso but i dont have a time b4. Im in vacation this month kaya I want to know kung pwede pa ituloy ang kaso.

 

I would like to ask kung pwede pang ituloy ang processing ng kaso after 5 months. I made have a police report and medical cert. napirmahan na ng 2nd procecutor but hindi ko na dala sa fiscal kasi laging wala. I file the case in sta. cruz laguna im living in mandaluyong gusto ko sana ituloy ang kaso but i dont have a time b4. Im in vacation this month kaya I want to know kung pwede pa ituloy ang kaso.

[lawenta]

Could someone please help me in this case.... nakasanla ang house and lot ni A kay B for 300k. After so many years nag demand na nang bayad si B kay A. Si C, isang abugado, ang nakikipag usap kay A para kay B. dahil sa interest umabot ang babayaran ni A nang 1 million. Nung mag babayad na si A kay B nang 1 million. may dinagdag si C na 20% sa amount for attorney's fee. A was not expecting the additional 20% that C is asking for. Is C entitled to add 20% and charged it to A? If not what are the remedies that A can have against C.

 

additional info: there was no collection case filed by B against A

[rocco69]

dumeretso na si A kay B at sabihin niya na di nya kayang magbayad ng dagdag pang 20% sa P1M. kung pumayag si B, solb ang problema

 

Could someone please help me in this case.... nakasanla ang house and lot ni A kay B for 300k. After so many years nag demand na nang bayad si B kay A. Si C, isang abugado, ang nakikipag usap kay A para kay B. dahil sa interest umabot ang babayaran ni A nang 1 million. Nung mag babayad na si A kay B nang 1 million. may dinagdag si C na 20% sa amount for attorney's fee. A was not expecting the additional 20% that C is asking for. Is C entitled to add 20% and charged it to A? If not what are the remedies that A can have against C.

 

additional info: there was no collection case filed by B against A

[lawenta]

dumeretso na si A kay B at sabihin niya na di nya kayang magbayad ng dagdag pang 20% sa P1M. kung pumayag si B, solb ang problema

 

This is not about A's inability to pay the 20%.... This is about whether C is entitled sa 20% na hinihingi nya... kung entitled si C then A has no choice but to pay... but kung hindi naman entitled si C then A wants to know kung ano ang mga remedies na pwede nyang magamit against C...

[rocco69]

kung karapatang maningil ng attorney's fees ang pinag-uusapan, tingnan niya yung kontrata ng pagsasangla kung meron dung attorney's fees na due kung di siya makapagbayad on time. Kung meron, magkano ang amount. kung ang paghingi ng 20% ay sumasang-ayon sa kontrata, may karapatan silang magpataw nito.

 

ngunit dahil wala pa ngang kaso, lahat naman yan ay madadaan sa pakiusap, kahit pa nakalagay sa kontrata (just because nakalagay sa kontrata doesn't mean na wala nang choice si A kundi magbayad - pwede naman i-waive ni B ang attorney's fees). pwede si A pumunta kay B at makiusap na wag nang ipataw yung 20% (whether provided sa kontrata o hindi). kung provided sa contract yung 20%, ang pinakamagandang dahilan ay sabihin niya na di niya kayang bayaran ito (kahit me pera siya - P200T is still a lot of money). kung di naman provided sa contract, yun ang sabihin niya (na wala namang ganung penalty sa kontrata).

 

ngayon, sabihin nating sa kontrata, di entitled si C sa 20% - kailangan pa ring pumunta ni A kay B kasi baka di alam ni B ang ginawa ni C. In that case, magsumbong siya kay B.

 

Kung alam ni B na naningil si C ng 20% kahit wala sa kontrata, kailangan pa rin ni A kausapin si B na tanggalin na ito - dahil wala nga sa kontrata.

 

In sum, kailangan pa rin talagang kausapin ni A si B tungkol dito.

 

This is not about A's inability to pay the 20%.... This is about whether C is entitled sa 20% na hinihingi nya... kung entitled si C then A has no choice but to pay... but kung hindi naman entitled si C then A wants to know kung ano ang mga remedies na pwede nyang magamit against C...

Edited March 17, 2010 by rocco69

[lawenta]

kung karapatang maningil ng attorney's fees ang pinag-uusapan, tingnan niya yung kontrata ng pagsasangla kung meron dung attorney's fees na due kung di siya makapagbayad on time. Kung meron, magkano ang amount. kung ang paghingi ng 20% ay sumasang-ayon sa kontrata, may karapatan silang magpataw nito.

 

ngunit dahil wala pa ngang kaso, lahat naman yan ay madadaan sa pakiusap, kahit pa nakalagay sa kontrata (just because nakalagay sa kontrata doesn't mean na wala nang choice si A kundi magbayad - pwede naman i-waive ni B ang attorney's fees). pwede si A pumunta kay B at makiusap na wag nang ipataw yung 20% (whether provided sa kontrata o hindi). kung provided sa contract yung 20%, ang pinakamagandang dahilan ay sabihin niya na di niya kayang bayaran ito (kahit me pera siya - P200T is still a lot of money). kung di naman provided sa contract, yun ang sabihin niya (na wala namang ganung penalty sa kontrata).

 

ngayon, sabihin nating sa kontrata, di entitled si C sa 20% - kailangan pa ring pumunta ni A kay B kasi baka di alam ni B ang ginawa ni C. In that case, magsumbong siya kay B.

 

Kung alam ni B na naningil si C ng 20% kahit wala sa kontrata, kailangan pa rin ni A kausapin si B na tanggalin na ito - dahil wala nga sa kontrata.

 

In sum, kailangan pa rin talagang kausapin ni A si B tungkol dito.

 

 

what if nakalagay nga sa contract na may attorney's fee but hindi nakalagay ang specific na amount is the 20% an acceptable percentage sa ganitong kaso?

[rocco69]

usually kasi 10% of the amount is considered reasonable (ito ang usual na ipinapataw sa labor cases).

 

dahil walang amount na nakalagay, depende na rin sa usapan nila yung amt. kung OK na kay A yung 20%, yun na yun. basically, nasa usapan pa rin ni A at B ito.

 

what if nakalagay nga sa contract na may attorney's fee but hindi nakalagay ang specific na amount is the 20% an acceptable percentage sa ganitong kaso?