Roubaix Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 It all depends on how good your lawyer is or how deep your pockets are. Aiko's went for a year and a half. But it should normally take a couple of years. It is because it is 2 or 3 months between hearings, if you are lucky.hmm, thanks, man....i read somewhere that if there's no contact for 7 years between spouses (yung di na nagkikita, communicate or something), it's ok to remarry, how true? According to Article 41 of the Family Code, the spouse who is looking for the other spouse must have a well founded belief that the missing spouse is DEAD and has had no sight of that spouse for 4 years. Before that spouse can remarry, the present spouse must go to court and ask for judicial declaration of presumptive death. But there must be a sincere effort to look for the missing spouse not just failing to respond to the text messages (joke only). Quote Link to comment
p5yf3r Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 Thanks Roubaix, you've been very helpful...one last thing, how sincere should 'sincere' be? Quote Link to comment
Wolf Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 Thanks Roubaix, you've been very helpful...one last thing, how sincere should 'sincere' be? evidence will have to be presented as to the efforts actually taken to locate. siguro, physical effort talaga dapat. As in pinuntahan ang last known address, nag-interbyu ng mga kakilala, trace public and private records like credit card usages, utility or phone bills, etc. Quote Link to comment
paige Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 i need an expert on CSC law, gusto kong ihabla boss ko Quote Link to comment
Roubaix Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 CSC law? I am sorry, first time I have heard of this term. Please elaborate. Thanks. Quote Link to comment
Guest templar Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 (edited) CSC law? I am sorry, first time I have heard of this term. Please elaborate. Thanks.I think it's the Civil Service law .... innocentlady - you're a gov't. employee, right?....it was one of my electives in law school but never got to apply it ..... sayang, galing pa naman prof ko dito ... si ex-Comm. Sam Barlongay. Edited July 2, 2003 by templar666 Quote Link to comment
paige Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 CSC law? I am sorry, first time I have heard of this term. Please elaborate. Thanks.I think it's the Civil Service law .... innocentlady - you're a gov't. employee, right?....it was one of my electives in law school but never got to apply it ..... sayang, galing pa naman prof ko dito ... si ex-Comm. Sam Barlongay. yes, i'm a gov't employee. i know i should seek advice from the CSC but i tot maybe someone here could help me out. it's about the application of the flexi-time rule of the CSC. Quote Link to comment
UN0 Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 meron na bang local cases ng sexual harassment against a male? or maybe a rape? Quote Link to comment
younghermit Posted July 3, 2003 Share Posted July 3, 2003 Yeah, can the mods please reconsider their decision to unglue this fine thread? Quote Link to comment
d3ckard Posted July 3, 2003 Share Posted July 3, 2003 may alam ba kayo na pang-convert ng .doc to .pdf?? try adobe distiller Quote Link to comment
Roubaix Posted July 3, 2003 Share Posted July 3, 2003 Innocentlady, I also did not take up civil service law back in the best law school in Rockwell. Are are you trying to implement the flexi-time rule? I represented some doctors from gov't hospital before. It was an Ombudsman case. I had CSC documents that allowed the doctors flexi-time as long as they completed 40 hours a week. It was a special case as they were doctors and there was the Magna Carta for Health Workers to back their claim. Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted July 3, 2003 Author Share Posted July 3, 2003 meron na bang local cases ng sexual harassment against a male? or maybe a rape? you mean male ang victim?.... Quote Link to comment
Cyber_pinoy Posted July 3, 2003 Share Posted July 3, 2003 meron na bang local cases ng sexual harassment against a male? or maybe a rape? you mean male ang victim?.... I think, you are still pertaining to male as the aggressor and female pa rin ang victim. Tama ba? Your statement was "sexual harassment against a male" which I suppose, a complaint against a male. Please be clear, konting facts lang ang nabago, laking twist ang application ng law. Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted July 3, 2003 Author Share Posted July 3, 2003 Hello Ilocana: I love you.....ikaw lang love ko promise..... Butsoy Quote Link to comment
darLeng_mo Posted July 3, 2003 Share Posted July 3, 2003 err... hinlab si sir butsoy?! yeheyyyy! hehehe... makiki off topic din.. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.