legal Free Legal Advice

[transcience]

i suggest that you read the recent decision of antonio v. reyes, 10 march 2006. it will be helpful to your case. find it in supremecourt.gov.ph.

 

i will try to explain it if i get the time. sorry, im busy now.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

ok. i'll try to find time reading it. thanks.

[transcience]

yes sir, the law sucks until and unless our family code is ammended...

the spirit of the law according to our supreme court is the preservation of family being the smallest unit of the society.

in case of doubt in the interpretation of the law should be judge in favor of the preservation of family..

 

if you will notice gasgas na yung rason na pyschological incapacity kahit hindi talaga...and what is more irrational eh ung right of the goverment to inquire to the collusion of both parties in the annulment proceedings initiated by one of them.or to inquire to the validity of the grounds and evidence procured by both parties.. :mtc:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

"preservation of family being the samllest unit of the society" -- but what about the preservation of sanity of the people involved? and the right to live a happy normal life?

 

the law is selfish.

[tranzfixer]

"preservation of family being the samllest unit of the society" -- but what about the preservation of sanity of the people involved? and the right to live a happy normal life?

 

the law is selfish.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

yeah right...even me is against to the idea of keeping the marital tie when the love and respect are gone..

 

but still sir it is the law, we govern by law.....

 

anyway, it is still a question of fact if your case merit the granting of nullity of marriage....expensive lang talaga.....

[transcience]

yeah right...even me is against to the idea of keeping the marital tie when the love and respect are gone..

 

but still sir it is the law, we govern by law.....

 

anyway, it is still a question of fact if your case merit the granting of nullity of marriage....expensive lang talaga.....

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

frustrating 'no.

 

anyway, i'm not a "sir".

[tranzfixer]

frustrating 'no.

 

anyway, i'm not a "sir". 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

sori po madame..... :*

tke care

[lomex32]

Impregnated.... ADULTERY na po un ....

 

Criminal na ere

 

having a sexually transmitted desease and impregnated by other man

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

[quatro]

is it legal for a call center company to issue a 30 day notice period right after passing your resignation letter?

 

coz based on hat i know & from others... 2 weeks lang daw. pero 30 days ang ini-impose ng company namin.

 

tnx!

[jopoc]

is it legal for a call center company to issue a 30 day notice period right after passing your resignation letter?

 

coz based on hat i know & from others... 2 weeks lang daw. pero 30 days ang ini-impose ng company namin.

 

tnx!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

good day

 

inasmuch as 2 weeks is the usual practice, the law does not prohibit a longer period. so if it is your employment contract or company policy, i is valid.

[jopoc]

ok. i'll try to find time reading it. thanks.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

this is the case that i was saying.

 

anotinio v. reyes

[tranzfixer]

Impregnated.... ADULTERY na po un ....

 

Criminal na ere

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

what im talking to poh is that a woman impregnated by other man prior of gettin married and she try to conceal...

[tranzfixer]

is it legal for a call center company to issue a 30 day notice period right after passing your resignation letter?

 

coz based on hat i know & from others... 2 weeks lang daw. pero 30 days ang ini-impose ng company namin.

 

tnx!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

the labor code provides that a 30 day notice should be given to the employer before the effectivity of the resignation...the company may decrease the 30 day notice however it could not increase more than what the law provides....

therefore your company policy is valid.... :mtc:

[transcience]

this is the case that i was saying.

 

anotinio v. reyes

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

i've read it half-way. now, i'm getting some ideas from that case.

[Firewolf9]

Today is paycheck day! I have a problem with my salary. The salary covers from April 1- 15 and I just got it today. My day-off is thursday and friday, That fall into maundy thursday and good friday (Arpil 13 and 14). I do expect that I can get a 100% salary on that day because the it is a legal holiday but I didn't. I got my payslip also and I found that I got a 200% pay only for April 9(araw ng kagitingan).

 

I ask our finance department about it and they said that I cannot get a 100% on APR 14 and 15 because we are on monthly basis.

 

Is this correct?

 

This is not the case when I am on daily basis. I get a 100% pay during legal holidays.

 

I need your full explaination on this so that I can reason out myself.

 

Thank you.

[exciting_night_owl]

To all those in the legal circle,

 

Know where I can buy a complete set of SCRA and PHIL REPORTS? I prefer second hand as long as the price is good and the books are still in good condition. Thanks!

[quatro]

the labor code provides that a 30 day notice should be given to the employer before the effectivity of the resignation...the company may decrease the 30 day notice however it could not increase more than what the law provides....

therefore your company policy is valid.... :mtc:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

tnx... gud day!