legal Free Legal Advice

[rocco69]

eto yung kinakasama ng isang tao bilang kanyang asawa, pero di sila kasal. masasabi natin na ang iyong ka-live-in ngayon ay iyong common law wife.

 

Hello !! Ask ko lang who do we consider a common law wife ? I am single but living in with a single woman of legal age for 9 years now. Need enlightenment lang !

[disorder1666]

Good day sir,

 

Since I filed a estafa case last June 2009 to the procecutors office in the municipality of the respondents... Then the letter of subpoena has been ignored by the respondents and a resolution has been submitted by the procecutors...

 

Ever since that day wala na po akong balita kung ano na nangyari... Does it mean my case has been denied?

 

Justice delayed is justice denied...

 

Please enlighten me attorney. Thank you and God Bless.

[rocco69]

i-follow-up mo sa fiscal's office kung ano na ang nangyari sa kaso mo. dalhin mo yung I.S. No. ng kaso mo para madaling makita. tanungin mo yung sekretarya ng fiscal na me hawak kung ano na ang nangyari sa kaso na yun. baka rin naman kasi, na-desisyunan na ito. marami rin kasing hawak na kaso ang mga fiscal kaya di mo rin masisisi kung bakit minsan, mabagal ang resolution ng kaso.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Good day sir,

 

Since I filed a estafa case last June 2009 to the procecutors office in the municipality of the respondents... Then the letter of subpoena has been ignored by the respondents and a resolution has been submitted by the procecutors...

 

Ever since that day wala na po akong balita kung ano na nangyari... Does it mean my case has been denied?

 

Justice delayed is justice denied...

 

Please enlighten me attorney. Thank you and God Bless.

[homerboy]

eto yung kinakasama ng isang tao bilang kanyang asawa, pero di sila kasal. masasabi natin na ang iyong ka-live-in ngayon ay iyong common law wife.

THANKS// WHAT ABOUT HER RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS AS COMPARED TO A MARRIED SPOUSE?

[kaze_jade]

tulong naman po mga lawyers

 

 

ang wife ko po ay may stalker ex bf. nalaman po ng wife ko na hiwalay pala sa asawa ung ex niya kya hiniwalayan nya po ito. bago sila naghiwalay e kumuha sila ng bahay sa pagibig. gumastos na ung ex niya ang 17,352 sa house na un. at sinisingil niya wife ko para bayaran siya pero siempre di kami pumayag. gumawa ng pekeng dokumento ung ex niya which states na NAGPATAGO siya ng pera sa wife ko worth 17,500 para pag naikasal n sila. ang masama po may pirma po ito nang wife ko dahil ang pepel po n ginamit ay ung excuse letter na blanko na pinagawa dati ng wife ko na may pirma niya nga. di pa rin po pumayag wife ko na bayaran dahil peke naman po ung dokumento. nagpalabas po ng mga private pictures ng wife ko ung SOB na ex niya. pinadala po sa mga kaibigan at kaopismate na wife ko. natangal po sa work niya ung wife ko,

kya isunumbong po namin sa mga pulis ung ginagawa ng ex niya. nagkaroon po ng entrapment at naikulong ung f#cking sh!t na tao n un. nakapagpiyansa ung guy at kinasuhan naman ng estafa (art. 315) ung wife ko. nagpatago lng po ng pera ung nakasulat sa dokumento. he entrusted 17500 to my wife for their future plans when they get marries. un po nakasulat. sulat kamay niya pa nga.. may laban po b wife ko sa kaso? Estafa po ba n matatawag un?

[rocco69]

THANKS! WHAT ABOUT HER RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS AS COMPARED TO A MARRIED SPOUSE?

 

ipagpapalagay ko na pareho kayong walang sabit.

 

kapag ganun, Art. 147 ng Family Code ang iiral sa samahan ninyo. sa ilalim nito, ang sweldo mo at sweldo niya ay pag-aari niyo pareho. lahat ng ari-arian at kagamitan na maipupundar ninyo sa pagsisikap ninyo habang kayo ay nagsasama ay pag-aari nyong dalawa.

 

halimbawa, sa inyong pagsasama, nakabili ka ng bahay at lupa gamit ang sweldo mo. dahil ang sweldo mo ay pag-aari nyong dalawa, ang bahay at lupa ay pag-aari nyo pareho.

 

ipinapalagay din ng batas na lahat ng naipundar habang kayo ay nagsasama, kung walang ebidensya kung saan ito galing, ay pag-aari nyo pareho.

 

sa katunayan, kung ang isa sa inyo ay nasa bahay lang (walang trabaho) at ang ginagawa lamang niya ay alagaan at asikasuhin ang pamilya at bahay niyo (mag-alaga ng bata, magluto, maglinis, maglaba, etc.), eto ay itinuturing ng batas na kanyang kontribusyon sa lahat ng ari-arian at gamit na naipundar mo habang kayo ay nagsasama. eg. nagmana ka ng P1M mula sa nasira mong magulang (ang P1M ay solo mong pag-aari dahil hindi naman ito sweldo at di rin naman galing sa iyong pagsisikap), bumili ka ng bahay at lupa gamit ang P1M, kalahati nun ay pag-aari na ng kinakasama mo kung siya ay nasa bahay lang at nag-aalaga sa iyo at sa inyong pamilya.

 

pero dahil hindi naman kayo kasal, wala kang obligasyon na suportahan siya. hindi rin siya magmamana sa iyo dahil hindi mo siya kaano-ano (maliban na lang kung ikaw ay magbibigay ka sa kanya ng mana sa pamamagitan ng testamento).

 

dahil di kayo kasal, ang mga anak ninyo ay "illegitimate" at sila ay nasa ilalim ng parental authority ng ina.

[rocco69]

ang mga elemento ng estafa ay:

 

(1) that money, goods, or other personal properties are received by the offender in trust, or on commission, or for administration, or under any other obligation involving the duty to make delivery of, or to return, the same;

 

(2) that there is a misappropriation or conversion of such money or property by the offender or denial on his part of such receipt;

 

(3) that such misappropriation or conversion or denial is to the prejudice of another; and,

 

(4) that there is a demand made by the offended party on the offender.

 

sabi mo, wala naman talagang perang natanggap ang asawa mo. kung wala, ibig sabihin, wala agad ang unang elemento. at dahil wala ngang natanggap, wala din ang pangalawa, at pangatlong elemento. kung ganun, masasabi natin na walang estafang naganap.

 

ang problema mo lang, ang usapin kung me perang tinanggap ang misis mo o wala ay kailangang patunayan sa pamamagitan ng ebidensya. hindi dahil sinasabi nyo na walang perang natanggap o na peke yung papel ay paniniwalaan na kayo ng piscalya. eto ay kailangan nyong patunayan. kung mapapatunayan nyo ito, madi-dismis yung kaso, kung hindi naman, eto ay isasampa sa korte at dun nyo patutunayan na walang katotohanan ang sinasabi niya. sa madaling salita, ilalaban nyo talaga ito - una, sa piskalya, at kung hindi maniwala ang piskal sa inyo, sa korte.

 

mukhang maganda naman ang laban nyo at lumalabas na kontra-demanda na lang ito ng ex ng asawa mo, dahil naunahan nyo na siya sa kasuhan.

 

good luck sa inyo! at ayon na rin kay atty. sison "kapag may katwiran, ipaglaban mo!" [kapag walang katwiran, bayaran mo!]

 

 

tulong naman po mga lawyers

 

 

ang wife ko po ay may stalker ex bf. nalaman po ng wife ko na hiwalay pala sa asawa ung ex niya kya hiniwalayan nya po ito. bago sila naghiwalay e kumuha sila ng bahay sa pagibig. gumastos na ung ex niya ang 17,352 sa house na un. at sinisingil niya wife ko para bayaran siya pero siempre di kami pumayag. gumawa ng pekeng dokumento ung ex niya which states na NAGPATAGO siya ng pera sa wife ko worth 17,500 para pag naikasal n sila. ang masama po may pirma po ito nang wife ko dahil ang pepel po n ginamit ay ung excuse letter na blanko na pinagawa dati ng wife ko na may pirma niya nga. di pa rin po pumayag wife ko na bayaran dahil peke naman po ung dokumento. nagpalabas po ng mga private pictures ng wife ko ung SOB na ex niya. pinadala po sa mga kaibigan at kaopismate na wife ko. natangal po sa work niya ung wife ko,

kya isunumbong po namin sa mga pulis ung ginagawa ng ex niya. nagkaroon po ng entrapment at naikulong ung f#cking sh!t na tao n un. nakapagpiyansa ung guy at kinasuhan naman ng estafa (art. 315) ung wife ko. nagpatago lng po ng pera ung nakasulat sa dokumento. he entrusted 17500 to my wife for their future plans when they get marries. un po nakasulat. sulat kamay niya pa nga.. may laban po b wife ko sa kaso? Estafa po ba n matatawag un?

[kaze_jade]

Salamat po sir rocco69

 

sa ngaun po e nagaantay kami ng resolusyon. sana nga po e madismiss na ung kaso kasi buntis ngaun ung wife ko at ayoko siya ma stress

[dudsi]

good day to all!

 

i have been involved in a vehicular accident sa loob ng subdivision. ang problema, hindi binigyan ng weight ng fiscal yung mga circumstances ng accident. yung tama kasi ng sasakyan ko sa harap at dun sa kabilang party sa side ang tama. of course ang initial judgement natin, yung sasakyan ko ang bumangga sa kanya. but the truth is na side swipe nya ako because speeding sya.

 

saan po ba pwede lumapit na goverment agency? ang gusto ko lang sana is an expert/professional opinion para matimbang lahat ng evidence. i can post the pictures for further reference para mas ma picture nyo kung ano/paano nangyari.

 

additional info pa po, yung naka banggaan ko was coming from a blind curve at super bilis. no way i could have avoided. mukhang talo lang ako sa picture kasi front ang tama ko, at sya naman sa side.

 

PLEASE HELP!!! IM FROM IMUS CAVITE

[agentjackbauer]

Meron bang nakakita sa insidente maliban sa iyo at yung kalaban mo?

[dudsi]

Meron bang nakakita sa insidente maliban sa iyo at yung kalaban mo?

wala po sir, but kitang kita sa picture kung saan sya napahinto after the collision. tumakbo pa sasakyan nya ng ilang metro. pa kaliwa kasi ako kaya mabagal lang takbo ko.

[agentjackbauer]

So may pending case ka for reckless imprudence resulting to damage to property?

 

A lawyer needs to be able to read the Resolution before being able to give a responsible and intelligent course of action. Go consult one asap or send a copy of the resolution to one of the lawyers here.

 

It is not clear from your posts how things actually happened. It now becomes a matter of evidence na lang if you really want to fight this one out. I suggest though that if you have comprehensive insurance, just avoid the hassle and settle this case asap. Otherwise, you might find yourself litigating this matter for years to come.

Edited October 21, 2009 by agentjackbauer

[dudsi]

So may pending case ka for reckless imprudence resulting to damage to property?

 

A lawyer needs to be able to read the Resolution before being able to give a responsible and intelligent course of action. Go consult one asap or send a copy of the resolution to one of the lawyers here.

 

It is not clear from your posts how things actually happened. It now becomes a matter of evidence na lang if you really want to fight this one out. I suggest though that if you have comprehensive insurance, just avoid the hassle and settle this case asap. Otherwise, you might find yourself litigating this matter for years to come.

sir,

do you know any lawyer in this thread? are you a lawyer? bago lang ako dito sa thread. madalas ako sa dare to bare eh. hehehehe. baka may ma recommend ka na lawyer dito sa thread i can seek advice. many thanks.

[Roubaix]

sir,

do you know any lawyer in this thread? are you a lawyer? bago lang ako dito sa thread. madalas ako sa dare to bare eh. hehehehe. baka may ma recommend ka na lawyer dito sa thread i can seek advice. many thanks.

 

It's best to PM the lawyers here. They are easy to spot. But in respect to the profession, please do know that like doctors, lawyers can charge for a consultation. It is fair to pay a lawyer for the advice he will give.

[dudsi]

It's best to PM the lawyers here. They are easy to spot. But in respect to the profession, please do know that like doctors, lawyers can charge for a consultation. It is fair to pay a lawyer for the advice he will give.

i agree with you that professionals like lawyers can charge for consultation fees. but isnt this a free online consultation for members thread? so far, di pa naman ako siningil ng member pinadalhan ko na pm at nag reply.

[dudsi]

So may pending case ka for reckless imprudence resulting to damage to property?

 

A lawyer needs to be able to read the Resolution before being able to give a responsible and intelligent course of action. Go consult one asap or send a copy of the resolution to one of the lawyers here.

 

It is not clear from your posts how things actually happened. It now becomes a matter of evidence na lang if you really want to fight this one out. I suggest though that if you have comprehensive insurance, just avoid the hassle and settle this case asap. Otherwise, you might find yourself litigating this matter for years to come.

yes, may pending case na ako sa mtc. parehas kasi kami nagsampa ng reklamo sa fiscal, unfortunately na dismiss yung reklamo ko at na elevate sa mtc yung reklamo nya. i have doubts na nalagyan yung fiscal.

ask ko lang po sa mga lawyers na pwede at gustong magbigay ng advice, i can email you the resolution and pictures para mas maintindihan po ninyo nangyaring insidente. i also made some points na sa tingin ko pwede i raise, i just dont know kung may bearing pag dating sa court.

salamat po.

[agentjackbauer]

Yes, I am a lawyer but it seems you have already consulted one. Do note, however, that while consultation here may be free, you will have to get a lawyer to represent you in your criminal case. Otherwise, you may end up with a PAO lawyer (if you qualify as an indigent).

 

 

sir,

do you know any lawyer in this thread? are you a lawyer? bago lang ako dito sa thread. madalas ako sa dare to bare eh. hehehehe. baka may ma recommend ka na lawyer dito sa thread i can seek advice. many thanks.

[Dr_PepPeR]

My worthless thoughts about free consultation here in MTC.

 

Yes, it is possible to get free and helpful legal advice here, but as professionals, lawyers have to make a living too. If the advice sought is off-the-cuff, which can be answered from stock knowledge or from the lawyer's professional experience, then you may be able to rely on the advice given. However, if you want someone who can spend some time examining your case or predicament, and it involves some time and effort on the lawyer's part, then it is fair to expect that you will be charged accordingly, or that your question will not be fully answered to your satisfaction.

 

There is also a caveat about free advice. Professionals may be not be as thorough when giving free opinions as when they are contracted for it. After all, they can't be expected to examine all the angles and conduct extensive research for work that is not paid for, so it is reasonable and prudent to take any advice given here with a grain of salt.

 

In other words, if you want quality service from a professional, don't expect to get it exactly for free.

 

Okay, so crucify me.

Edited October 23, 2009 by Dr_PepPeR

[pandemonium]

Tanong lang po sa legal experts...meron po ako 1 maliit na negosyo dati. ito po ay ginawa namin Corporation (5 individuals as incorporators). di namin alam na ang accountant namin ay tinatarando na pala kami. un mga binabayad namin sa kanya para sa city hall at bir ay binubulsa na pala niya. Sinabay pa ng malas ay humina ang kita ng company. dahil sa pagkalugi ay nagdesisyon nalang kaming magkasosyo ay isara nalang ang company noon 2007. Hindi na namin na close ang mga records namin sa city hall at bir. ngayon ay may pinadalang sulat daw sa dating office address namin at naghihingi ng records ang bir.

 

ang tanong po eh...ala na kami mga records and assets at ang iba namin partners ay nasa abroad na. may habol pa ba gobyerno sa amin 5 o sa mga naiwan dito?

[Butsoy]

I conceptualized this free legal advice for the benefit of those who would like to be given quick instant but quality advice from lawyer-members of MTC. I agree with Dr. PepPer. Some people need only the basics on how to cope with their legal problems and queries, to avoid paying consultation fees. If you believe you are not contented

you are always free to contact personnaly any lawyer-member here or any lawyer for that matter and bring all your docs and papers for a fee of course. Correct, while we provide free legal service in consonance with our sworn duty as lawyers, we also are entitled to earn to live a respectable decent life----being a lawyer.

 

Hope our subscribers will understand.

 

ilan taon na ba ang Legal Thread na ito ? hehehehehehe I salute to my companeros who dutifully served our MTC clients---for free

 

Butsoy

 

 

 

My worthless thoughts about free consultation here in MTC.

 

Yes, it is possible to get free and helpful legal advice here, but as professionals, lawyers have to make a living too. If the advice sought is off-the-cuff, which can be answered from stock knowledge or from the lawyer's professional experience, then you may be able to rely on the advice given. However, if you want someone who can spend some time examining your case or predicament, and it involves some time and effort on the lawyer's part, then it is fair to expect that you will be charged accordingly, or that your question will not be fully answered to your satisfaction.

 

There is also a caveat about free advice. Professionals may be not be as thorough when giving free opinions as when they are contracted for it. After all, they can't be expected to examine all the angles and conduct extensive research for work that is not paid for, so it is reasonable and prudent to take any advice given here with a grain of salt.

 

In other words, if you want quality service from a professional, don't expect to get it exactly for free.

 

Okay, so crucify me.

Edited October 23, 2009 by Butsoy

[dudsi]

in behalf of my fellow mtc members na humingi at nabigyan ng free advices, thank you sa mga matutulungin nating lawyers dito sa mtc.

 

more power to MTC!!!

 

mga bossing,

 

ask ko lang po kung sakop ng Land Transportation Traffic Code ang loob ng private subdivisions. sa loob po kasi ng subdivision nangyari yung insidente ng banggan at ito rin po ang naging basis ng fiscal sa kanyang resoloution. salamat po.

[harman]

in behalf of my fellow mtc members na humingi at nabigyan ng free advices, thank you sa mga matutulungin nating lawyers dito sa mtc.

 

more power to MTC!!!

 

mga bossing,

 

ask ko lang po kung sakop ng Land Transportation Traffic Code ang loob ng private subdivisions. sa loob po kasi ng subdivision nangyari yung insidente ng banggan at ito rin po ang naging basis ng fiscal sa kanyang resoloution. salamat po.

 

Dudsi, have you filed a motion for reconsideration to the dismissal resolution of the fiscal? Or a petition for review with the DOJ maybe? These are options available to you in case you want to keep your case alive.

 

It seems that there are plenty of facts that you need to discuss with your lawyer in order to give you a good rundown of all your options. You will not gain anything by divulging bits and pieces of the case. Better go see your lawyer now while there is still time.

[dudsi]

@ harman

 

not yet. inasikaso ko kasi yung bail ko kasi nai file na yung demanda nya sa mtc. ano ba practical at magandang option to take eh mukhang nalagyan na yung fiscal to favor yung kalaban ko.

 

option 1: file for motion for reconsideration to the dismissal resolution of the fiscal;

 

option 2: face trial

 

ano pa ba options ko? pag nag face trial ba ako at sinabi ng judge na sya ang may mali, automatic ba na sya ang magbabayad sa akin kahit na yung case na on trial ay sya ang nagrereklamo? o do i have to file for a separate case at gagawin ko evidence yung decision ng judge na sinasabi sya talaga may kasalanan.

 

salamat po.

[pilipsandiego]

need a good labor lawyer...pm me. thanks

[dylandark]

ask ko lang po. pwede bang magi issue ang barangay chairman ng contempt of court pag di nakarating sa mediation/conciliation disputes? pag nagissue ba sila may ginawa na ba silang labag sa batas? salamat po.