legal Free Legal Advice

[b_9904]

Tanong lang po:

 

Other than the CHED Memorandum Order Number 18, Series of 2002 do you know any other: 1) Administrative Orders, Rules, and the like; or 2) laws that treats the Bachelor of Laws Degree as Equivalent to Master's Degree?

 

Thank you and God bless us all.

[subsistence]

Mga bossing tanong lang po, dba ang Sari Sari store or maliit na tindahan ay business din? Pati na rin po ang kainan?

 

Tama po ba? Kasi may maliit akong comp shop, 5 PC's po lahat. Tinatanong po ako kung asan ang permit ko, nasa loob po kasi ito ng bahay at mejo tago din po.

 

Ano po ang pwede kong isagot para kabahan din po sila sa ginagawa nila, eh sila din po kasi walang business permit.

 

Thank You po.

 

If ever, kukuha po ako ng business permit kung talagang kelangan...

[lomex32]

Kung na nabuhay pa ung hostage-taker na si Mendoza, anu-ano ang kaso na pwede sana naisampa sa kanya?

[Pinoymale]

Mga bossing tanong lang po, dba ang Sari Sari store or maliit na tindahan ay business din? Pati na rin po ang kainan?

 

Tama po ba? Kasi may maliit akong comp shop, 5 PC's po lahat. Tinatanong po ako kung asan ang permit ko, nasa loob po kasi ito ng bahay at mejo tago din po.

 

Ano po ang pwede kong isagot para kabahan din po sila sa ginagawa nila, eh sila din po kasi walang business permit.

 

Thank You po.

 

If ever, kukuha po ako ng business permit kung talagang kelangan...

 

Business pa rin sya regardless kung ilang pc units ang gamit mo. Sino ang nagtatanong tungkol sa permit mo, mga city hall employees ba? Ganyan din experience ko sa carwash ko before and sa sari-sari store ng nanay ko. Tuwing may magtatanong kung meron kami permit, sinasabi namin na bago pa lang ang business kaya tinitignan muna namin ng ilang buwan bago kumuha ng permit. In practice, pwede ka mag-operate ng business ng six months, or even one year, bago kumuha ng permit.

[subsistence]

Ahhh... Thanks boss.

 

Yung nagtatanong is yung erpat nung isang bata dito. Eh kasi parang na a adik na yung bata, lagi naglalaro although pa 2 hrs 2 hrs lang

[Pinoymale]

Ahhh... Thanks boss.

 

Yung nagtatanong is yung erpat nung isang bata dito. Eh kasi parang na a adik na yung bata, lagi naglalaro although pa 2 hrs 2 hrs lang

 

Ah ok. Ingat lang kasi baka ireklamo ng erpat ung business mo sa city hall, sakit lang sa ulo yun!

[hoowat]

pa help po mga Sir

A friend of mine is older than the guy...and They both wanna get married...What other options they would do if the guy is 22 and the need of parental advice must be met...

 

Thanks

[rocco69]

dahil nasa edad na naman sila, kapag di makakuha ng parental advice yung partner niya, made-delay lang ng tatlong buwan yung marriage license nila, kaya... mag-apply ng maaga ng marriage license para tumakbo agad yung 3-month period.

 

pa help po mga Sir

A friend of mine is older than the guy...and They both wanna get married...What other options they would do if the guy is 22 and the need of parental advice must be met...

 

Thanks

[subsistence]

Ah ok. Ingat lang kasi baka ireklamo ng erpat ung business mo sa city hall, sakit lang sa ulo yun!

 

Sir, ano naman po ang pwedeng gawin ng City Hall? Confiscate mga units ko?

 

Tapos, hindi ba pwedeng sabihin ko na on process na yung pagkuha ko ng business permit (which is what i'm doing right now)

 

thanks po ulit, more power!

[hoowat]

so ok lang po sir na wlang parental advice..madelayed lang ng 3mos?

 

Thank you for replying

[rocco69]

Yup. According to Art. 14 of the Family Code:

 

Art. 15. Any contracting party between the age of twenty-one and twenty-five shall be obliged to ask their parents or guardian for advice upon the intended marriage. If they do not obtain such advice, or if it be unfavorable, the marriage license shall not be issued till after three months following the completion of the publication of the application therefor. A sworn statement by the contracting parties to the effect that such advice has been sought, together with the written advice given, if any, shall be attached to the application for marriage license. Should the parents or guardian refuse to give any advice, this fact shall be stated in the sworn statement.

 

so ok lang po sir na wlang parental advice..madelayed lang ng 3mos?

 

Thank you for replying

[hoowat]

Thank You Sir Rocco69

[kg_snot]

Sir Rocco69,

 

panu po kung sa hearing sa labor arbiter pinalalabas ng company na d nila tinanggal yung employee at nagabsent lang daw. sa hearing unang nag issue ng return to work order na asking for written explanation for the unjustified absences since june 1, 2010 - exactly 2 months and 11 days after magstart na d pumasok kasi tinanggal nga. kung kayo po tatayong lawyer ng employer, anu po ang magagamit na defense against sa employee basing dito po sa series of events sa baba?

 

2010 timeline:

• 
   
  
• may 5 - ininform si employee na ireretrench by june 30 (verbal lang)
  
• may 25 - ininform si employee na until may 31 na lang sya, declined the request for resignation letter (verbal lang)
  
• may 28 - payday, walang na recieve na sahod, wala na rin dumating na supplies for the month of june
  
• may 30 - pinai-email yung resignation letter (text message recieved, did not comply)
  
• may 31 - still no salary
  
• june 1 - filed for illegal dismissal
  
• june 2 - 2nd half ng allowance for april recieved (2 gives eh)
  
• june 21 - kung pede daw magusap (text message)
  
• june 24 - 1st hearing, d sumipot
  
• july 14 - 2nd hearing, d sumipot
  
• july 15 - bat mo pa pinaabot sa ganito (text message recieved)
  
• aug 11 - 3rd hearing, respondent's lawyer issued a return to work order, explain in writing the absences since june 1, dated aug 11, 2010 (declined), nasa payroll pa daw si employee
  
• aug 13 - secured a bank statement from jan2010 to aug2010, proved no salary recieved for the May 15-31 cutoff
  
• sept 1 - 4th hearing, for position paper
  
• sept 21 - 5th hearing, issuance of position paper
  

 

Notes:

• 
   
  
• field worker, no time records, doctors' signature ang proof ng attendance ng nature of work nya
  
• 3 years and 6 months tenured employee as of may 31,2010
  
• no text message sent from the employee to the employer since may
  
• no letter or any document sent by company for awol process
  
• text messages were also saved dated may 28 to present from co-employees confirming the dismissal and non-payment of salary
  
• company issued cellphone, postpaid
  

 

please need assistance.

Edited September 2, 2010 by kg_snot

[rocco69]

base sa kwento mo, ang gagawing depensa ng employer ay nag-AWOL ang employee, hindi siya tinanggal.

 

whether paniniwalaan ito ng arbiter ay ibang istorya na.

 

Sir Rocco69,

 

panu po kung sa hearing sa labor arbiter pinalalabas ng company na d nila tinanggal yung employee at nagabsent lang daw. sa hearing unang nag issue ng return to work order na asking for written explanation for the unjustified absences since june 1, 2010 - exactly 2 months and 11 days after magstart na d pumasok kasi tinanggal nga. kung kayo po tatayong lawyer ng employer, anu po ang magagamit na defense against sa employee basing dito po sa series of events sa baba?

 

2010 timeline:

• 
   
  
• may 5 - ininform si employee na ireretrench by june 30 (verbal lang)
  
• may 25 - ininform si employee na until may 31 na lang sya, declined the request for resignation letter (verbal lang)
  
• may 28 - payday, walang na recieve na sahod, wala na rin dumating na supplies for the month of june
  
• may 30 - pinai-email yung resignation letter (text message recieved, did not comply)
  
• may 31 - still no salary
  
• june 1 - filed for illegal dismissal
  
• june 2 - 2nd half ng allowance for april recieved (2 gives eh)
  
• june 21 - kung pede daw magusap (text message)
  
• june 24 - 1st hearing, d sumipot
  
• july 14 - 2nd hearing, d sumipot
  
• july 15 - bat mo pa pinaabot sa ganito (text message recieved)
  
• aug 11 - 3rd hearing, respondent's lawyer issued a return to work order, explain in writing the absences since june 1, dated aug 11, 2010 (declined), nasa payroll pa daw si employee
  
• aug 13 - secured a bank statement from jan2010 to aug2010, proved no salary recieved for the May 15-31 cutoff
  
• sept 1 - 4th hearing, for position paper
  
• sept 21 - 5th hearing, issuance of position paper
  

 

Notes:

• 
   
  
• field worker, no time records, doctors' signature ang proof ng attendance ng nature of work nya
  
• 3 years and 6 months tenured employee as of may 31,2010
  
• no text message sent from the employee to the employer since may
  
• no letter or any document sent by company for awol process
  
• text messages were also saved dated may 28 to present from co-employees confirming the dismissal and non-payment of salary
  
• company issued cellphone, postpaid
  

 

please need assistance.

[play_boi]

What can we do? yung kakilala po ng grupo namin ay nag refer saamin ng isang deal. mga Kotse na ang sabi ay galing sa isang casino. Singanla saamin at ginamit na collateral pero dahil sa tiwala namin hindi na kami gaano nag usisa dahil matagal na naming sya kilala. Nung una ay humingi kami ng request na ang owner mismo ay pumapayag na ipagamit saamin ang auto sa isang kasulatan. Ngunit hindi niya ito sinunod! Kami ay nag tiwala hanggan sa isang araw ay ang mga auto na gamit namin ay kinuha ng mga may ari at ang sabi rent a car sila! In short niloko niya kami at hindi nag sabi ng totoo! May na invest kami na malaking pera dahil ang buong akala namin ay sangla ang auto.

 

Kami ay sumisingil sa kanya pero ayaw niya mag bayad! Ano ang pwede naming gawin? May mga properties sya at mga kotse! Applicable ba ditto ang notice of levy?

 

Thanks!