legalavatar Posted June 7, 2008 Share Posted June 7, 2008 I beg to disagree. Some cases do take six months to be legally completed. Seriously. Well frankly, the SolGen will be very interested in the six month annulment case your referring to. Care to give the case number and venue? Cheers! Quote Link to comment
complicated8 Posted June 8, 2008 Share Posted June 8, 2008 inquiry with training contracts..... meron na yata mga co-maker for these? is that really enforceable? Quote Link to comment
MODERATOR bonito99 Posted June 9, 2008 MODERATOR Share Posted June 9, 2008 Well frankly, the SolGen will be very interested in the six month annulment case your referring to. Care to give the case number and venue? Cheers! You work there? Give my regards to Agnes. Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted June 9, 2008 Author Share Posted June 9, 2008 and to Asst. Solicitor General dith Dizon she is a classmate in San Beda Butsoy You work there? Give my regards to Agnes. Quote Link to comment
taurenwarrior Posted June 9, 2008 Share Posted June 9, 2008 good day maesters! i have a gurl friend who has a lesbian ex. during their rel, pinagbgyan ng friend ko ung ex nya na kunan sya ng nude sa cam fone. everytime na ngaaway cla ung pic ang gingwang panakot nung lesbian sa knya. ngayon na gus2 ng mkipagbreak ng friend ko, gnon na nman.. tnatakot sya na ikakalat ung nga pics nya. pde bang kasuhan ung ex nya? Quote Link to comment
Pinoymale Posted June 9, 2008 Share Posted June 9, 2008 good day maesters! i have a gurl friend who has a lesbian ex. during their rel, pinagbgyan ng friend ko ung ex nya na kunan sya ng nude sa cam fone. everytime na ngaaway cla ung pic ang gingwang panakot nung lesbian sa knya. ngayon na gus2 ng mkipagbreak ng friend ko, gnon na nman.. tnatakot sya na ikakalat ung nga pics nya. pde bang kasuhan ung ex nya? Since it can be argued that the act of distributing the nude pics is a crime in itself, then making that threat constitutes Grave Threats under Art. 282 of the Revised Penal Code. Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted June 11, 2008 Share Posted June 11, 2008 "Ignorance of the Law excuses no one from compliance therewith." Does this law apply to all? Exempted ba dito ang mga turistang bumibisita sa Pinas? o yung mga taong bulag, pipi, at bingi? Nag-aapply ito sa lahat, ma-turista man o bulag, pipi, at bingi (ito ay Article 3 ng Civil Code of the Philippines). Sabi nga ni Mayor Lim, "The law applies to all, or none at all". Quote Link to comment
Dr_PepPeR Posted June 11, 2008 Share Posted June 11, 2008 ^ pero limitado ang capacity to act ng mga yun, dba?... For the blind, deaf and dumb, limited capacity only for certain specific acts, like for example being a witness to a will, but in general the law does not discrimminate. Quote Link to comment
ejomc Posted June 11, 2008 Share Posted June 11, 2008 mga bossing kelangan ko ng tulong hehehe yung pinsdan ko may maid sila nagwork na sakanila yun for 6years nanghihinge ng seperation and overtime pay daw kasi late daw minsan magpatulog nanghihinge ng 40,000 as seperation tapus hindi nila bnigyan. instead bingyan lang nila ng 10,000 as financial assistance daw. after few days nagpadala yung sulat sa kanila na nirerequest mag punta sa department of labor. parang ayaw na nila pumunta kasi hindi naman daw sila required sabi ng lawyer nila. tama ba yung ginawa nila? ano bang puede ko iadvice sa kanila? Quote Link to comment
Google Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 mga bossing kelangan ko ng tulong hehehe yung pinsdan ko may maid sila nagwork na sakanila yun for 6years nanghihinge ng seperation and overtime pay daw kasi late daw minsan magpatulog nanghihinge ng 40,000 as seperation tapus hindi nila bnigyan. instead bingyan lang nila ng 10,000 as financial assistance daw. after few days nagpadala yung sulat sa kanila na nirerequest mag punta sa department of labor. parang ayaw na nila pumunta kasi hindi naman daw sila required sabi ng lawyer nila. tama ba yung ginawa nila? ano bang puede ko iadvice sa kanila? May contract ba yung maid sa kanila detailing payment of overtime and separation pay? Yung sulat ba eh galing mismo sa DOLE? tapang din nung maid ah.... hehehehehe. binigyan na ng financial assistance, naghahabol pa ng separation pay.... hehehehe. Quote Link to comment
complicated8 Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 mga masters, follow-up lang po? inquiry with training contracts..... meron na yata mga co-maker for these? is that really enforceable? Quote Link to comment
azayco Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 mga masters, follow-up lang po? inquiry with training contracts..... meron na yata mga co-maker for these? is that really enforceable? Provide more details please. What is a training contract?Who are the parties?What is a co-maker? Quote Link to comment
complicated8 Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 Provide more details please. What is a training contract?Who are the parties?What is a co-maker? training contract is offered by company to let you go on training locally or overseas with aspects of monetary compensation if conditions are not fulfilled. Conditions such as stay with the company for x number of years. or pro-rated for the years versus the cost of training/travel/etc. Parties are company, employee, co-maker. Co-maker is a co-signee and someone who can legally be sued for non-compliance to contract terms between employee and employer. Quote Link to comment
azayco Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 It's hard to give an opinion without reading through the contract, but I'll take a shot using general principles. The employer and employee freely entered into a contract. The "co-maker" also voluntarily acceded to the contract (although I guess it is limited to the monetary penalties for breach of contract). The contract is therefore binding on all three persons. The "co-maker" is liable under the contract. He will have to check the extent of his liability. He can be liable immediately and primarily, i.e., the employer can go after him without going after the employee first. He can also be liable only if the employer goes after the employee first and finds out that the employee has no or insufficient property to pay of the monetary penalties. Either way, if the "co-maker" pays up, he can go after the employee for reimbursement. There are a lot of decisions on this arrangement, but I am not sure if there is one directly dealing on an employer-employee set-up. The usual arrangement is that of a loan - lender, borrower, guarantor or surety. Nevertheless, the basics remain the same - there is a binding contract. I do not see any reason why its provisions cannot be enforced. Hope that helps. Quote Link to comment
mazinger Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 guys. any info on when do we get a P 20.00 increase in our workers salary her ein metro manila? curious lang ako kung kailan. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.