Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

If there is truly a god, like the one in the bible, then every moral code he gave, he gives or will ever give will always be relevant.

If he tells you to love your neighbor, then that is moral. If he tells you to commit genocide in his name, then that is also moral because it came from the supreme authority on morality.

 

The true question is whether we as humans, should obey the command that we think are immoral yet came from the authority on morality?

Though objectively, committing genocide in the name of god is moral since the command came from him, we as humans still find killing others morally wrong.

Should we refuse killing in the name of god at the expense of burning in hell forever?

Link to comment

Six months since I last posted here. Nothing substantial came from the atheists side during that time. If we are to sum up their moral code, it is the same moral code given by the God that does not exist (according to them). Yeah, that makes perfect sense.

 

Given by "whom"? SINO kamo ang NAGBIGAY? NATITIYAK MO? NAKASISIGURADO KA?

 

O ayon lang sa PANINIWALANG ITINURO sa IYO?

 

NANINIWALA KA na MAY IBINIGAY, ngunit HINDI MO MAPATUNAYANG MAY NAGBIGAY nga. Yup, that makes perfect sense.

 

 

------------------------

 

AGAIN, before some atheist makes another post here trying to prove that God does not exist, IT IS A GIVEN, as far as this thread is concerned. Gets nyo? GIVEN NA NGA, so don't prove it. GOD DOES NOT EXIST (as far as this thread is concerned). NOW WHAT?

 

Tanggalin ang dios mo, at ang Moralidad na hinihingi mo ay ang Moralidad na mayroon ang Tao ngayon.

 

(PANAKOT lang ang DIOS MO ng sa gayon ay MAPILITANG SUMUNOD ang TAO.)

Link to comment

Tanggalin ang dios mo, at ang Moralidad na hinihingi mo ay ang Moralidad na mayroon ang Tao ngayon.

 

 

Ok, I will bite.

 

Minus God, kaninong morality? Yung Chinese version ba (as I have given a very specific example here)? You can not propose that to be the American version of morality as it is founded on this concept/principle, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Klaro naman siguro sa declaration na ito na it is because there is a CREATOR kaya merong inalienable rights ang lahat ng tao, according to the moral code of the US style democracy (which we have modeled our laws after). So your statement na "tanggalin mo lang ang Diyos, yun na ang morality ng tao" is ILLOGICAL. You can not remove that. Yun ang PREMISE e. Bakit merong inalienable rights? You have to explain in your moral code.

 

Yun nga ang tanong ng thread na ito. Ano ang morality without God. You have to be specific. Saan na naka-base yung moral code mo kung walang Creator.

 

-------------

 

OK, para mas klaro ang post let me illustrate:

 

1. Western style democracy (which we follow) is based on the PREMISE that all men have "unalienable rights given by the CREATOR, of which are life, liberty,and the pursuit of happiness." Accepted as true (by way of convention).

 

2. Communism Chinese style (atheist) -- what is best for society is what is right. Yan ang premise nila.

 

Ikaw, merong ibang moral code? Ibigay mo dito. Or do you choose the Chinese style of morality? You can not choose the first, otherwise, you will have to accept that meron Creator na nagbigay sa iyo ng unalienable rights. Gets?

Edited by skitz
Link to comment

Ok, I will bite.

 

Minus God, kaninong morality? Yung Chinese version ba (as I have given a very specific example here)? You can not propose that to be the American version of morality as it is founded on this concept/principle, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Klaro naman siguro sa declaration na ito na it is because there is a CREATOR kaya merong inalienable rights ang lahat ng tao, according to the moral code of the US style democracy (which we have modeled our laws after). So your statement na "tanggalin mo lang ang Diyos, yun na ang morality ng tao" is ILLOGICAL. You can not remove that. Yun ang PREMISE e. Bakit merong inalienable rights? You have to explain in your moral code.

 

Yun nga ang tanong ng thread na ito. Ano ang morality without God. You have to be specific. Saan na naka-base yung moral code mo kung walang Creator.

 

-------------

 

OK, para mas klaro ang post let me illustrate:

 

1. Western style democracy (which we follow) is based on the PREMISE that all men have "unalienable rights given by the CREATOR, of which are life, liberty,and the pursuit of happiness." Accepted as true (by way of convention).

 

2. Communism Chinese style (atheist) -- what is best for society is what is right. Yan ang premise nila.

 

Ikaw, merong ibang moral code? Ibigay mo dito. Or do you choose the Chinese style of morality? You can not choose the first, otherwise, you will have to accept that meron Creator na nagbigay sa iyo ng unalienable rights. Gets?

 

LIKAS ang MORALIDAD sa TAO.

 

Ang DIOS, PRODUKTO lang ng ISIPAN ng TAO.

Kung sinabi ni Moses na, "Heto ang 10 Utos na IBINIGAY sa AKIN ng DIOS", ang TANONG ay MAY IBINIGAY nga bang talaga? MAY NAGBIGAY nga ba?

 

O PRODUKTO lang ng ISIPAN ni Moses?

 

MASAMA nga bang PUMATAY ng KAPWA DAHIL yun ang SABI sa KANYA ng DIOS? O AYON sa MORALIDAD na LIKAS sa KANYA?

PAREHO TAYO na MAY "MATA"...

 

... ang AKIN, PRODUKTO ng EVOLUTION,

 

... ang IYO, PINANINIWALAAN MONG BIGAY sa IYO ng DIOS MO,

Ngayon ang TANONG, ANO ang MATA "MINUS GOD"?

... ang SAGOT, WALANG PINAGKAIBA sa MATA na MAYROON ang TAO ngayon,

... IBA-IBA ng SUKAT,

 

... IBA-IBA ng KULAY.

Link to comment

Let's put your LIKAS (papaya) moral code to the test.

 

1. How should AIDS (or other pandemic threatening) disease carriers be treated?

 

WALANG PINAGKAIBA sa KUNG PAANO DAPAT i-TRATO ang KAHIT na SINONG TAO, MAY SAKIT man o WALA.

 

 

2. Gay marriage, pro or con?

 

LIKAS ang HOMOSEXUALITY.

HINDI AKO APEKTADO kung MAGPAKASAL sila, WALANG MASAMANG MANGYAYARI sa AKIN kung MAGPAKASAL man SILA...

... so WALANG DAHILAN para AKO TUMUTOL.

 

 

3. Death penalty, pro or con?

 

PRO at CON.

 

CON kung AKO o ang mga MALALAPIT sa AKIN ang NASA DEATH PENALTY.

 

PRO kung ang GUMAWA ng MASAMA sa AKIN o sa mga MALALAPIT sa AKIN ang NASA DEATH PENALTY.

 

Ngayon, IKAW naman...

... BATAY sa MORALIDAD MO na PINANINIWALAAN MONG IBINIGAY sa IYO ng DIOS MO,

... ANO ang IYONG SAGOT sa 3 TANONG MO?

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Given by "whom"? SINO kamo ang NAGBIGAY? NATITIYAK MO? NAKASISIGURADO KA?

 

O ayon lang sa PANINIWALANG ITINURO sa IYO?

 

NANINIWALA KA na MAY IBINIGAY, ngunit HINDI MO MAPATUNAYANG MAY NAGBIGAY nga. Yup, that makes perfect sense.

 

 

 

 

Tanggalin ang dios mo, at ang Moralidad na hinihingi mo ay ang Moralidad na mayroon ang Tao ngayon.

 

(PANAKOT lang ang DIOS MO ng sa gayon ay MAPILITANG SUMUNOD ang TAO.)

Faith is a gift which you are yet to receive.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...