chocorobot Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Dear Noynoy, P*tang ina mo panot ka, binawasan mo bonus ng mga nurses, at sa pamahalaan mo nagiging private ang mga public hospital. Tuwid na daan kamo? PWE!! Pasalamat ka at panay bobo lang ang mga pilipino kaya ka nakaupo ngayonpinaniwalaan na marunong ka kahit hindi naman. Ang tanging alam mo lang naman ay manigarilyo at makipaglaro ng psp sa abnoy na pamangkin mo. Nananawagan ako na bumaba ka na dyan sa pwesto mo. P*tang ina mo ulit. Quote Link to comment
scam Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 ABNOY, p#tang %na ka talaga, dahil sa katamaran mo nanganganib na naman ang mga kababayan natin sa taiwan.Napaka liit na problem, napalala mo pa. Kung hindi ka napakatamad gugong ka, na ayos na agad sana ngmaaga. Nagpa last minute ka pa letse ka dahil sa katamaran mo, lumala lang tuloy. pati ang mga Hong Kongpeolpe ay nagalit na rin. Dapat sa iyo ibabalik sa pinagalingan ng ankan mo sa China. Punyeta ka!!!! Quote Link to comment
chocorobot Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 ABNOY, p#tang %na ka talaga, dahil sa katamaran mo nanganganib na naman ang mga kababayan natin sa taiwan.Napaka liit na problem, napalala mo pa. Kung hindi ka napakatamad gugong ka, na ayos na agad sana ngmaaga. Nagpa last minute ka pa letse ka dahil sa katamaran mo, lumala lang tuloy. pati ang mga Hong Kongpeolpe ay nagalit na rin. Dapat sa iyo ibabalik sa pinagalingan ng ankan mo sa China. Punyeta ka!!!! Agree Quote Link to comment
red60 Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 I read in the newspaper that BS Aquino will issue an executive order to ban fishing of galunggong. The apparent reason was that a "study" showed that the annual galunggong harvest dropped by two or three percent in recent years. The ban would supposedly give the specie some breathing room to recover its population. The galunggong fishing ban would cause the price of galunggong to skyrocket. High prices would tempt fishermen to harvest galunggong illegally. Does our Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) have enough resources to police and enforce the ban? I doubt it. The ban would instead give the maritime fishing authorities opportunity to take bribes from illegal galunggong fishermen. Haven't they considered that even if Abnoy bans Filipino fishermen from harvesting galunggong, the Chinese poachers will continue harvesting them anyway? Does he have the BFAR and/or Coast Guard resources to enforce the ban in Palawan waters of the West Philippine Sea and keep the Chinese poachers and illegal fihermen out? Another case of abnoy's hare-brained executive order in the making. What he should do instead is to declare a no-fishing-zone at known galunggong spawning areas in the seas around Palawan and add patrol boats / aircrafts to police and regulate fishing activities there. This will take more time to study and implement but at least it will have a chance to work. Actually they did this in Zamboanga in 2011. It was met by resistance but turned out to be a good idea. There was a 6% increase in yield in metric tons and sizes of the galunggong were bigger thus more meaty. I've been to Palawan several times. According to the locals, Most Chinese fishermen in the area are harvesting exotic sea creatures and not Round Scad (Galunggong). Quote Link to comment
camiar Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 Actually they did this in Zamboanga in 2011. It was met by resistance but turned out to be a good idea. There was a 6% increase in yield in metric tons and sizes of the galunggong were bigger thus more meaty. I've been to Palawan several times. According to the locals, Most Chinese fishermen in the area are harvesting exotic sea creatures and not Round Scad (Galunggong).I doubt it. The article I read says there was no conclusive evidence of the beneficial effect of galunggong ban. BFAR does not and cannot accurately monitor the tonnage of each fish specie the fishermen catch each year. Do they monitor the catch of Chinese and Taiwanese poachers, too? All they can do is estimate. The government claims 6% increase after the fishing ban? Against whose data did they compare? Since the best they can do is to make an estimate, they can make up any data that would be self serving. The Chinese poachers only harvest exotics and stay away from galunggong? Highly doubtful too. Coming all the way to the Philippine waters from China is a big investment on fuel, equipment, and labor. They harvest whatever they can to recover their expenses. The exotics just add more to their profit. Quote Link to comment
red60 Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 I doubt it. The article I read says there was no conclusive evidence of the beneficial effect of galunggong ban. BFAR does not and cannot accurately monitor the tonnage of each fish specie the fishermen catch each year. Do they monitor the catch of Chinese and Taiwanese poachers, too? All they can do is estimate. The government claims 6% increase after the fishing ban? Against whose data did they compare? Since the best they can do is to make an estimate, they can make up any data that would be self serving. The Chinese poachers only harvest exotics and stay away from galunggong? Highly doubtful too. Coming all the way to the Philippine waters from China is a big investment on fuel, equipment, and labor. They harvest whatever they can to recover their expenses. The exotics just add more to their profit. Commercial fishing vessels unload their catch in fish ports where fish vendors, sardine manufacturers, processors bid on them. Exact quantity in tubs unloaded each night is public knowledge and can easily be converted to metric tons. Regarding the Chinese in Palawan. The exotic sea creatures make more profit than galunggong in China. so It's really other way around, exotics which includes corrals are the priority. This is according to one of our partners in China. Quote Link to comment
camiar Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 (edited) Commercial fishing vessels unload their catch in fish ports where fish vendors, sardine manufacturers, processors bid on them. Exact quantity in tubs unloaded each night is public knowledge and can easily be converted to metric tons. Regarding the Chinese in Palawan. The exotic sea creatures make more profit than galunggong in China. so It's really other way around, exotics which includes corrals are the priority. This is according to one of our partners in China. Your statement only confirms what I said that BFAR does not and cannot accurately monitor the tonnage catch of each specie. They only look at the catch brought in by big commercial fishing boats. They only look at the major commercial species. That means their tonnage figures are just estimates. Their estimates can be off by 5 or 10% and nobody can tell. If they claim that the one-year fishing ban increased the galunggong catch by 6%, it's just pure hogwash. The Chinese have over-fished their own territorial waters that's why they're here to poach. They wouldn't care if they catch exotics or commercial fish varieties. They're both money in their pockets. And don't tell me Chinese poachers are in our territorial waters just for the exotics. There are also Chinese poachers who are exclusively after the commercial varieties too. Both of them are stealing from us. Edited June 5, 2013 by camiar Quote Link to comment
scam Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Punyeta ka talaga Abnoy. palpak ka naman sa Taiwan crisis at ikaw lang ang dapat sisihin kaya ito lumala. Ngayon naman trapik at baha ang problema, ang hinahanap mo eh kung sino ang dapat sisihin hindi kung ano ang sanhi at dapat na solution. Gago ka, huwag kang maghanap ng sisishin kasi mga kaalyado mo silang lahat at wala ka rin gagawin. Magaling at mabilis ka lang magtangal kung hindi mo kaalyado tulad ni Dir. Nilo ng Pagasa. Ngayon nagsisilayasan ang mga taga-Pagasa kasi palpak ka at mga alipores mo. Punyeta ka, hindi ka pa malunod sa baha. Quote Link to comment
scam Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Punyeta ka talaga Abnoy. palpak ka naman sa Taiwan crisis at ikaw lang ang dapat sisihin kaya ito lumala. Ngayon naman trapik at baha ang problema, ang hinahanap mo eh kung sino ang dapat sisihin hindi kung ano ang sanhi at dapat na solution. Gago ka, huwag kang maghanap ng sisishin kasi mga kaalyado mo silang lahat at wala ka rin gagawin. Magaling at mabilis ka lang magtangal kung hindi mo kaalyado tulad ni Dir. Nilo ng Pagasa. Ngayon nagsisilayasan ang mga taga-Pagasa kasi palpak ka at mga alipores mo. Punyeta ka, hindi ka pa malunod sa baha. Quote Link to comment
heatseeker0714 Posted June 19, 2013 Share Posted June 19, 2013 Dear Noynoy, Follow-up lang namin yung Marina na nire-request ni Mayor Bito-onon ng Municipality of Kalayaan, Province of Palawan. Pag nagkaroon na ng Marina don pwede ng dumaong Ro-Ro vessels... Para magka-tourismo sa lugar... it's a soft way of sayong F.ck You to the Chinese din... Quote Link to comment
oscartamaguchiblackface Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 Headlines in the Philippine Daily Inquirer, July 12, 2013 http://newsinfo.inqu...obes-p10-b-scam So whatever happened to the "matuwid na daan" of Noynoy? Quote Link to comment
oscartamaguchiblackface Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 (edited) Pork barrel funds of lawmakers were used in this scam. According to the above report, "JLN offered to lawmakers commissions equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the amount of PDAF in exchange for the right to determine the implementing agency and fund beneficiary," according to Benhur Luy, the kidnap victim. Taxpayers' money was used to fund these corrupt politicians' pork barrels. I think it's obscene how BIR Commissioner Kim Henares is vigorously implementing new BIR regulations in a bid to increase tax collections only to be misused by politicians in scams like these. Taxpayers' money should be used to fund construction of new infrastructure to decongest traffic (ie. new rail systems, additional trains, double deck EDSA, etc. ) Instead of providing the necessary infrastructures as the ultimate solution to the traffic problem, the MMDA is planning to expand the coding scheme for private vehicles. Instead of just once a week, motorists will now be banned from using their cars twice a week. Motorists constantly complain about the traffic. But between the daily nightmare of enduring heavy traffic, and foregoing the use of their cars, I would imagine, 100% of car owners would prefer to endure the heavy traffic instead of being car-less for two days. Now are we living in a democracy or in a dictatorship? In a democracy, the call of majority of citizens must be followed. In a dictatorship, one man (in this case Francis Tolentino) calls the shots. If Tolentino somehow gets his stupid plan implemented, then his will, not the will of the majority would have been followed. Therefore, are we going to allow a dictator to over-rule the voices of the majority? Edited July 12, 2013 by oscartamaguchiblackface Quote Link to comment
sonnyt111 Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 Headlines in the Philippine Daily Inquirer, July 12, 2013 http://newsinfo.inqu...obes-p10-b-scam So whatever happened to the "matuwid na daan" of Noynoy?P10 billion...and to think authorities wouldn't have caught wind of this scam if the whistle blower hadn't been kidnapped to begin with. Crime detection by the police seems to be below par. The police wouldn't have detected that this crime was even happening if the mastermind of this scam hadn't abducted her employee. Quote Link to comment
sonnyt111 Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 (edited) Pork barrel funds of lawmakers were used in this scam. According to the above report, "JLN offered to lawmakers commissions equivalent to 40 to 60 percent of the amount of PDAF in exchange for the right to determine the implementing agency and fund beneficiary," according to Benhur Luy, the kidnap victim. Taxpayers' money was used to fund these corrupt politicians' pork barrels. I think it's obscene how BIR Commissioner Kim Henares is vigorously implementing new BIR regulations in a bid to increase tax collections only to be misused by politicians in scams like these. Taxpayers' money should be used to fund construction of new infrastructure to decongest traffic (ie. new rail systems, additional trains, double deck EDSA, etc. ) Instead of providing the necessary infrastructures as the ultimate solution to the traffic problem, the MMDA is planning to expand the coding scheme for private vehicles. Instead of just once a week, motorists will now be banned from using their cars twice a week. Motorists constantly complain about the traffic. But between the daily nightmare of enduring heavy traffic, and foregoing the use of their cars, I would imagine, 100% of car owners would prefer to endure the heavy traffic instead of being car-less for two days. Now are we living in a democracy or in a dictatorship? In a democracy, the call of majority of citizens must be followed. In a dictatorship, one man (in this case Francis Tolentino) calls the shots. If Tolentino somehow gets his stupid plan implemented, then his will, not the will of the majority would have been followed. Therefore, are we going to allow a dictator to over-rule the voices of the majority?Seems Tolentino has run out of intelligent suggestions on how to minimize traffic. Maybe he should return to the basics and enforce traffic laws first before resorting to hair-brained schemes like the one he's contemplating on right now. Taxes must be used to fund infrastructure projects designed to address the worsening traffic situation. Developing high-speed train systems will allow people from provinces as far as the Bicol province in the south and Ilocos province in the north to commute to Manila for work and return to their respective province after office with the high-speed train service. There won't be a need for these people to flock to Metro Manila in search of jobs. Doubling the capacity of EDSA by making it a double deck highway like you suggested should also be prioritized. Actually I heard about this suggestion about a year ago but haven't heard about it since then. Adding trains to the over-crowded mrt could make mass transport more attractive to those who prefer to use their cars. Doing away with the boundary system and giving bus drivers salaries instead could improve the driving habits of bus drivers and help minimize accidents. Upgrading the existing metro rail system could also help move large numbers of people to their destinations. Making use/reviving/expanding the use of water-craft along the Pasig river could also help move large numbers of people to their destinations. Tolentino must realize that there are certain things he cannot mess around with. There are constrainst he must respect. And that is to respect the decision of millions of car owners who have the right to use their cars to get to work. Because, as far as car owners are concerned, public transportation IS NOT AN ALTERNATIVE to using their cars. Edited July 12, 2013 by sonnyt111 Quote Link to comment
scam Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Seems Tolentino has run out of intelligent suggestions on how to minimize traffic. Maybe he should return to the basics and enforce traffic laws first before resorting to hair-brained schemes like the one he's contemplating on right now. How do you expect for Tolentino to resolve metro traffic when he cannot even fix the traffic in Tagaytay during his termand up to now. Isang kalye lang yun, grabe lagi ang trapik pag weekend & holidays, it's from Tagaytay up to Nasugbu.Metro traffic is out of his league. Ang alam lang nya, magbyahe sa ibang bansa in disguise of learning the traffic in thatcountry. Pero meron ba cyang natutunan? Dapat sa kanya, audit ng COA, puro junket walang result. About the 10B scam, matagal na yan pinaputok lang ngayon. Bakit? Kasi walang masabing maganda achievement si Panot, so kailangannya ng smoke screen at para sisihin uli si GMA. BULOK NA STYLE MO ABNOY! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.