SaintPeter5858 Posted April 6, 2012 Share Posted April 6, 2012 Sometimes I'd rather focus on the circumstances involved Quote Link to comment
U.P. AdMU2008 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 How can we justify it? Quote Link to comment
jackp Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Its murder. So its a sin Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Sometimes, it's really difficult to judge the cases here Quote Link to comment
U.P. AdMU2008 Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 Hirap mag decide on this. Baka pag mahihirap yun family. Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 There are still plenty of debates about this Quote Link to comment
BrightestStar Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Hope I can list down all the exceptions. Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 Case to case basis most of the time Quote Link to comment
U.P. AdMU2008 Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 Do we have Bioethics expert here? Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 If it was not intended in the first place because it only became a secondary effect like in a case of ectopic pregnancy. The intention is to remove the fetus and transfer it to its proper place. But in the course of the transfer, the fetus dies and therefore it becomes an unintentional abortion. Quote Link to comment
U.P. AdMU2008 Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 Who among MTC members are expert on this topic? Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Which principle of bioethics can be applied here? Quote Link to comment
MTC666TheDevil Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 It's always a sin. Quote Link to comment
Ron Paparoon Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Well there are instances that abortion would be the only option. These are cases wherein the benefit outweighs the negative effects. Like for instance, a mother having a high-risk pregnancy, or a situation wherein the pregnancy aggravated a certain illness that the woman have. The choices are: keep the child, yet after childbirth there is a certainty that the mother would die and the chance of the child to survive is 50/50 (since the mother is ill, the baby would definitely not in good shape as well); or abort the pregnancy, the mother's condition would be reverted and be saved. So would it be the baby, or the mother? Another example: a mother was pregnant, but then she contracted measles/german measles during her pregnancy. At the time of the ultrasound the baby was found to be missing limbs, have an abnormal heartbeat and even if the child survive, the child would be expected to live only for a short lifespan, say a few months. Would you continue or would you like to abort the baby? There are a lot of issues regarding abortion. I am a nurse, and I myself don't see abortion as a good solution, but if it is the only choice, especially if it is to save a life, then why not? It is just an opinion. Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Thanks for the explanation. But it's still about the circumstances involved Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.