Annulment 101

[Raven]

mag-apply sa NSO ng CENOMAR para dun sa babae. kapag lumabas sa record ng NSO na kasal na sa babae bago yung kasal nila ni guy, may problema si guy (kahit "faked" itong kasal, hindi pupwedeng sila-sila ang magsabi na "faked" ito, dapat hukuman ang magdedesisyun ukol dito — dahilan dito, pati yung kasal ni girl at guy ay mawawalang-bisa din).

 

Your advice was followed. Found out that wife previous marriage is registered in the NSO, this means that the wife have a record in NSO both for the first marriage(other guy) and second marriage(husband). Now here is another question. The wife first marriage with a that other guy, this other guy happen to be already married, so this means the wife first marriage is invalid because she is already a second marriage for this other guy.

 

Can the husband use this as a ground for annulment.

Does the wife first marriage is considered automatically invalid because the other guy is already married? Do she need to do something to remove this from her NSO record?

Edited February 24, 2011 by Raven

[moridins79]

Your advice was followed. Found out that wife previous marriage is registered in the NSO, this means that the wife have a record in NSO both for the first marriage(other guy) and second marriage(husband). Now here is another question. The wife first marriage with a that other guy, this other guy happen to be already married, so this means the wife first marriage is invalid because she is already a second marriage for this other guy.

 

Can the husband use this as a ground for annulment.

Does the wife first marriage is considered automatically invalid because the other guy is already married? Do she need to do something to remove this from her NSO record?

 

Your scenario falls under Article 40 of the Family Code which contemplates a situation where a second or bigamous marriage was contracted. Under Article 40, "[t]he absolute nullity of a previous marriage may be invoked for purposes of remarriage on the basis solely of a final judgment declaring such previous marriage void." Thus:

x x x where the absolute nullity of a previous marriage is sought to be invoked for purposes of contracting a second marriage, the sole basis acceptable in law, for said projected marriage to be free from legal infirmity, is a final judgment declaring a previous marriage void.

 

so, if the husband and wife got married prior to the effectivity of the Family Code (in 1998), they're legally married. If not, their marriage is bigamous and the first marriage of the wife may be used by the husband as a ground for declaring their marriage void.

[Raven]

Your scenario falls under Article 40 of the Family Code which contemplates a situation where a second or bigamous marriage was contracted. Under Article 40, "[t]he absolute nullity of a previous marriage may be invoked for purposes of remarriage on the basis solely of a final judgment declaring such previous marriage void." Thus:

 

 

so, if the husband and wife got married prior to the effectivity of the Family Code (in 1998), they're legally married. If not, their marriage is bigamous and the first marriage of the wife may be used by the husband as a ground for declaring their marriage void.

 

Moridins thanks for the info ... want to clarify further, let says the 1st Marriage of the girl to the other guy (who is already legally married) was year 1996 and the second marriage is to the husband is 1998. So does the wife and husband marriage is valid?

[rocco69]

hindi pa rin. in 1996, effective na ang Family Code. sabi nga, kahit pa walang bisa ang kasal mo, kailangan mo pa rin ng deklarasyon ng hukuman tungkol dito. sa madaling salita, kahit walang bisa ang ang kasal nung babae sa unang lalaki dahil may asawa na ito), kailangan niyang pumunta muna sa korte para ipadeklarang walang bisa ang kasal niya bago siya magpakasal muli. pag basta lang siyang nagpakasal, wala ring bisa ang kasalang yun.

 

Moridins thanks for the info ... want to clarify further, let says the 1st Marriage of the girl to the other guy (who is already legally married) was year 1996 and the second marriage is to the husband is 1998. So does the wife and husband marriage is valid?

[rocco69]

dahil menor-de-edad pa lang ang anak nila, pwede niya itong kasuhan ng child abuse (other forms of child abuse ang di pagbibigay sustento sa menor-de-edad na anak).

 

ito rin ay bumabagsak sa violence against women and children, na isa ring krimen.

 

papuntahin mo ang pamangkin mo sa Women's and Childrens Desk sa police station para matulungan siya doon na magsampa ng karampatang kasong kriminal laban sa magaling niyang asawa. dahil kasong kriminal, di na niya kailangan ng abugado pag ito ay nasampa sa korte, fiscal ang abugado niya.

dahil ito ay may kulong, siguradong magmamakaawa ang magaling niyang asawa, at magbibigay ng tamang sustento. wag siyang papayag except kasunduan na aaprubahan ng korte (ipapadaan yan sa mediation kung saan ipagkakasundo sila, yun ay inaaprubahan ng korte), para may ngipin ang kasunduan, hindi yung sila sila lang ang magkakasundo.

 

I don't know if this is the right thread

 

mga bro

 

kasi may problema ang pamangkin ko na babae

 

ganito yun.

 

 

kasal sila at may 1 anak na mag 4 yrs/ old na

 

ang mister ng pamangkin ko ay nagkaroon ng kulasisi na ka opismeyt niya

 

sasabihin ko na kung saan nag-work ang lalake at kulasisi sa FEU IT dept.

 

para malaman baka kilala niyo kasi para malaman niyo ang kalawanghiyaan ng lalake

 

ang pamangkin ko ay di siya nag-work.

 

ngayon nahuli ng pamangkin ko ang mister niya ay may iba ngang ka-relasyon

 

ngayon ay hiwalay na sila ng pamangkin ko.

 

nag-usap sila tungkol na lang na sustentuhan na lang ang anak nila

 

bale ang napag usapan ay bibigyan ng Php8k kada sahod ang anak nila.

 

pero unang bigay pa lang ay Php3k lsng sng bigay at sabi ng lalake ay kung ano

lang ang kaya niyang bigay yun ang ang mabibigay niya.

 

ang kinakatakot ko ay mag-abroad na ang lalake at hindi na mabigyan ng suporta ang bata.

 

at mawlan ng sustento ang bata at wala naman work ang pamangkin ko

 

kanino po ba ako pwede lumapit para matulungan ko ang pamangkin ko

 

or mabigyan man lang ng hold-order ang lalake para di makapag-abroad

 

baka mayron kayong kilala na abugado na matulungan ang pamangkin ko

 

walang-wla talaga ang pamangkin ko

 

 

sana po ay may makatulong sa pamangkin ko

 

thnx

 

god bless

Edited February 24, 2011 by rocco69

[Raven]

hindi pa rin. in 1996, effective na ang Family Code. sabi nga, kahit pa walang bisa ang kasal mo, kailangan mo pa rin ng deklarasyon ng hukuman tungkol dito. sa madaling salita, kahit walang bisa ang ang kasal nung babae sa unang lalaki dahil may asawa na ito), kailangan niyang pumunta muna sa korte para ipadeklarang walang bisa ang kasal niya bago siya magpakasal muli. pag basta lang siyang nagpakasal, wala ring bisa ang kasalang yun.

 

rocco .... you mean hindi valid yung kasal nung husband and wife kahit kung titingnan eh hindi naman din valid yung kasal nung wife sa una dahil married na yung other guy ...

 

Sorry medyo makulit tanong ko ... so hindi talaga valid yung kasal ng wife and husband?

 

One more thing ... kung mapawalang bisa ng wife yung unang kasal nya (mapatangal sa NSO record) ... does it mean valid na yung kasal nila ng husband nya?

Edited February 28, 2011 by Raven

[rocco69]

1. you mean hindi valid yung kasal nung husband and wife kahit kung titingnan eh hindi naman din valid yung kasal nung wife sa una dahil married na yung other guy ...

 

yes, dahil nga kung ikaw ay kasal na (kahit pa talagang walang-bisa ito - dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walng-bisa ang isang kasal), hindi ka maaaring basta-basta magpakasal ulit. kailangang may deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang nauna mong kasal bago ka magpakasal ulit.

 

entonces, hindi talaga valid yung kasal ng wife and husband.

 

 

2. kung mapawalang bisa ng wife yung unang kasal nya (mapatangal sa NSO record) ... does it mean valid na yung kasal nila ng husband nya?

 

hindi pa rin. dahil nga nung panahon na magpakasal si husband and wife, walang deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang naunang kasal ni wife, ang kanyang pangalawang kasal ay walang-bisa din. kailangan nilang magpakasal ulit after mapawalang-bisa yung unang kasal ni wife.

 

 

rocco .... you mean hindi valid yung kasal nung husband and wife kahit kung titingnan eh hindi naman din valid yung kasal nung wife sa una dahil married na yung other guy ...

 

Sorry medyo makulit tanong ko ... so hindi talaga valid yung kasal ng wife and husband?

 

One more thing ... kung mapawalang bisa ng wife yung unang kasal nya (mapatangal sa NSO record) ... does it mean valid na yung kasal nila ng husband nya?

[Raven]

1. you mean hindi valid yung kasal nung husband and wife kahit kung titingnan eh hindi naman din valid yung kasal nung wife sa una dahil married na yung other guy ...

 

yes, dahil nga kung ikaw ay kasal na (kahit pa talagang walang-bisa ito - dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walng-bisa ang isang kasal), hindi ka maaaring basta-basta magpakasal ulit. kailangang may deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang nauna mong kasal bago ka magpakasal ulit.

 

entonces, hindi talaga valid yung kasal ng wife and husband.

 

 

2. kung mapawalang bisa ng wife yung unang kasal nya (mapatangal sa NSO record) ... does it mean valid na yung kasal nila ng husband nya?

 

hindi pa rin. dahil nga nung panahon na magpakasal si husband and wife, walang deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang naunang kasal ni wife, ang kanyang pangalawang kasal ay walang-bisa din. kailangan nilang magpakasal ulit after mapawalang-bisa yung unang kasal ni wife.

 

Rocco thanks for clarification ...

One last thing ... so if it is invalid (husband and wife marriage) ...ano na pananagutan ng husband sa wife. kelangan pa rin ni husband ipawalang bisa yung kasal nila ng wife nya thru annulment ba para kung gusto nya mag asawa ulit. Pwede ba gawing ground ng husband yung first marriage ng wife to file annulment.

Thanks in advance ...

[rocco69]

1. ano na pananagutan ng husband sa wife.

 

dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walang-bisa ang isang kasal, hangga't walang deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang kasal nila, sa mata ng batas, mag-asawa pa rin sila. pero dahil nga may-asawa na pala before si babae, pwedeng umayaw si husband na magsuporta ke babae.

 

 

2. kelangan pa rin ni husband ipawalang bisa yung kasal nila ng wife nya thru annulment ba para kung gusto nya mag asawa ulit.

 

yes, dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walang-bisa ang isang kasal.

 

 

3. Pwede ba gawing ground ng husband yung first marriage ng wife to file annulment

 

yes (although, technically, hindi ito tinatawag na "annulment", kundi "declaration of nullity"), at hindi rin yung first marriage ni wife per se, kundi yung 1st marriage AND the failure to obtain a declaration of nullity of the 1st marriage prior to contracting the marriage between husband and wife

 

 

Rocco thanks for clarification ...

One last thing ... so if it is invalid (husband and wife marriage) ...ano na pananagutan ng husband sa wife. kelangan pa rin ni husband ipawalang bisa yung kasal nila ng wife nya thru annulment ba para kung gusto nya mag asawa ulit. Pwede ba gawing ground ng husband yung first marriage ng wife to file annulment.

Thanks in advance ...

[Raven]

1. ano na pananagutan ng husband sa wife.

 

dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walang-bisa ang isang kasal, hangga't walang deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang kasal nila, sa mata ng batas, mag-asawa pa rin sila. pero dahil nga may-asawa na pala before si babae, pwedeng umayaw si husband na magsuporta ke babae.

 

 

2. kelangan pa rin ni husband ipawalang bisa yung kasal nila ng wife nya thru annulment ba para kung gusto nya mag asawa ulit.

 

yes, dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walang-bisa ang isang kasal.

 

 

3. Pwede ba gawing ground ng husband yung first marriage ng wife to file annulment

 

yes (although, technically, hindi ito tinatawag na "annulment", kundi "declaration of nullity"), at hindi rin yung first marriage ni wife per se, kundi yung 1st marriage AND the failure to obtain a declaration of nullity of the 1st marriage prior to contracting the marriage between husband and wife

 

 

Boss Rocco .... thanks so much, you're such a big help.

Does the cost of filing a "declaration of nullity" much cheaper than "annulment"

How about the proceeding is it much easier than annulment?

[rocco69]

rates are, as a general rule, pareho lang (kung magkano ay depende sa maraming factor, kaya paiba-iba ito, depende sa kausap mo).

 

pareho din lang ang proceedings (burden of proof is still with the petitioner, i.e. kailangang patunayan ng naghain na talagang may basehan para ipa-walang-bisa ang kasal)

 

Boss Rocco .... thanks so much, you're such a big help.

Does the cost of filing a "declaration of nullity" much cheaper than "annulment"

How about the proceeding is it much easier than annulment?

[wildswans]

good day sir. i would like to ask something about marriage matters.

 

i have a friend and she's married for 10 years. her marriage was ok until her husband came home for vacation last year and met a young lady in a culinary training. her husband has been acting differently since then til he went aboard. the young lady applied to be a sea farer as well but was supposed to board a different ship, instead she was assigned to the same ship as the hubby when the hubby's work mate has to leave for emergency. it was a no brainer for the wife that her hubby was responsible for the lady to board the same ship coz her hubby has the authority to request whom to board. the hubby never told the wife about it and she has to learn it from someone else. sources at the ship said the lady and the hubby are close. the wife also found an email which is sort of a signal for two people to meet at wee hours of the morning. when her husband finally came home again for vacation, she waited for him to tell her about the young lady but it never materialized. so she had to take the initiative and asked bout it and also the secret email message but unfortunately, the hubby didn't explain a thing. in short, he just chose to shut up, change topic, lie about certain quesions or just deny it without giving an explanation. he doesnt bother reassures her wife nor comfort her doubt and fears but just say "wala akong babae" or "di ako nambabae". the wife is so fed up already with the hubby treating her like nobody and would very much like to leave his hubby but wants the hubby to support their 2 children's education. the wife suggested annullment to the hubby but he's not open to the idea. so now, the wife plans to draft a contract asking for a specific amount as "sustento" and let the guy signed it then notarized it. will this be honor in court should a problem arises? can she just draft the contract by herself/themselves or is it better to have a lawyer do it? any other way to do this?

[rocco69]

Hindi abugado ang solusyon sa lahat ng problema.

 

Sa problema ng kaibigan mo, hindi siya dapat nag-iisip agad ng annulment. sa tutoo lang, base sa kwento mo, walang ebidensya na katanggap-tanggap sa korte na nambababae si lalaki.

 

ang pinakamaganda talaga diyan, mag-usap sila ng masinsinan tungkol sa relasyon nila. kung ayaw ni lalaki, pilitin nya na mag-mariage counselling sila.

 

kapag umabot lang sa punto na masasabi niya na WALA NA TALAGANG PAG-ASA na sila'y magsama siya dapat lumapit sa abugado. As of now, going to a lawyer only jeopardizes the chances of the parties reconciling with each other.

 

 

 

 

good day sir. i would like to ask something about marriage matters.

 

i have a friend and she's married for 10 years. her marriage was ok until her husband came home for vacation last year and met a young lady in a culinary training. her husband has been acting differently since then til he went aboard. the young lady applied to be a sea farer as well but was supposed to board a different ship, instead she was assigned to the same ship as the hubby when the hubby's work mate has to leave for emergency. it was a no brainer for the wife that her hubby was responsible for the lady to board the same ship coz her hubby has the authority to request whom to board. the hubby never told the wife about it and she has to learn it from someone else. sources at the ship said the lady and the hubby are close. the wife also found an email which is sort of a signal for two people to meet at wee hours of the morning. when her husband finally came home again for vacation, she waited for him to tell her about the young lady but it never materialized. so she had to take the initiative and asked bout it and also the secret email message but unfortunately, the hubby didn't explain a thing. in short, he just chose to shut up, change topic, lie about certain quesions or just deny it without giving an explanation. he doesnt bother reassures her wife nor comfort her doubt and fears but just say "wala akong babae" or "di ako nambabae". the wife is so fed up already with the hubby treating her like nobody and would very much like to leave his hubby but wants the hubby to support their 2 children's education. the wife suggested annullment to the hubby but he's not open to the idea. so now, the wife plans to draft a contract asking for a specific amount as "sustento" and let the guy signed it then notarized it. will this be honor in court should a problem arises? can she just draft the contract by herself/themselves or is it better to have a lawyer do it? any other way to do this?

[wildswans]

Hindi abugado ang solusyon sa lahat ng problema.

 

Sa problema ng kaibigan mo, hindi siya dapat nag-iisip agad ng annulment. sa tutoo lang, base sa kwento mo, walang ebidensya na katanggap-tanggap sa korte na nambababae si lalaki.

 

ang pinakamaganda talaga diyan, mag-usap sila ng masinsinan tungkol sa relasyon nila. kung ayaw ni lalaki, pilitin nya na mag-mariage counselling sila.

 

kapag umabot lang sa punto na masasabi niya na WALA NA TALAGANG PAG-ASA na sila'y magsama siya dapat lumapit sa abugado. As of now, going to a lawyer only jeopardizes the chances of the parties reconciling with each other.

 

thank you sir for the advice. my friend has already tried talking to her husband. she even approach her in a nice way and not confrontational. one month na niyang sinusubukan na magusap sila ng matino pero ayaw talaga ng hubby. the hubby will either keep his mouth totally shut, he would change topic, sometimes would just say kalimutan mo na yun at wag mo na isipin para maging masaya tayo or say good boy ako or hindi ako nambabae. even the siblings of the wife and pamangkins(who doesnt know what's happening) saw that umiba yung kilos ni guy kasi laging tahimik, gusto magisa at minsan parang wala sa sarili. the wife is still asking around sa ship for proof tapos ganon pa treatment ni hubby kaya nahihirapan na siya at 3 weeks nalang babalik na ulit ng barko si guy at ayaw na ng wife mapranning kaya naisip nalang niya to set his husband free basta sustentohan mga anak nila. she told his hubby na punta sila sa lawyer for sustento and the hubby said oo daw. kaya niya naisip kung pwedeng sila nalang gawa contract about sustento kaya lang di lang niya sure kung honor sa court yun kapag di tinupad ni guy yung usapang sustento.

[pussyeater]

Greetings dear sirs!

 

I have a barkada who has had his marriage annulled. He is currently planning to remarry his current GF who, incidentally, also has had her previous marriage annulled. Mas nauna pa ngang ma-annul yung sa GF niya by 5 years (2003), yung sa kanya nung 2008 lang. I just want to ask what requirements they need to submit to the civil registrar in order for them to get married. He showed me a NSO-certified true copy of his marriage certificate with the words printed on the side stating that it was Null and Void ab Initio (tama ba spelling ko?). Is this all they need? If not, what other documents do they need to secure and more importantly, where can they get those?

 

Maraming salamat in advance!

Edited April 18, 2011 by pussyeater

[rocco69]

Art. 13 of the Family Code says, in order to get a marriage license from the Civil Registrar:

 

Art. 13. In case either of the contracting parties has been previously married, the applicant shall be required to furnish, instead of the birth or baptismal certificate required in the last preceding article, the death certificate of the deceased spouse or the judicial decree of the absolute divorce, or the judicial decree of annulment or declaration of nullity of his or her previous marriage.

In case the death certificate cannot be secured, the party shall make an affidavit setting forth this circumstance and his or her actual civil status and the name and date of death of the deceased spouse. (61a)

 

Greetings dear sirs!

 

I have a barkada who has had his marriage annulled. He is currently planning to remarry his current GF who, incidentally, also has had her previous marriage annulled. Mas nauna pa ngang ma-annul yung sa GF niya by 5 years (2003), yung sa kanya nung 2008 lang. I just want to ask what requirements they need to submit to the civil registrar in order for them to get married. He showed me a NSO-certified true copy of his marriage certificate with the words printed on the side stating that it was Null and Void ab Initio (tama ba spelling ko?). Is this all they need? If not, what other documents do they need to secure and more importantly, where can they get those?

 

Maraming salamat in advance!

[bher2]

pwede po ba kahit ako na lang ang magfile sa court ng declaration of nullity?

[jazon7099]

sir rocco, querry lng po.

ung friend ko po kc kinasal sila ng wife nya nung 17 pa lng ung babae. tapos, nung 19 na ung wife, kinasal sila uli sa simbahan. gusto na nya hiwalayan ung babae ngaun kc may lalake na ung wife.

pwede ba nya gawing reason ung pagiging minor nung wife nung una sila ngpakasa for nullity? nasa 40's na age nila ngaun.

if ever, naregister ung dalawang kasal, did the second marriage cure the defectin the first marriage? or the second marriage be considered a bigamous one, notwithstanding same ung parties?

thanks in advance po.

more power

[rocco69]

assuming na kinasal sila on or after August 3, 1988 (effectivity ng Family Code), walang bisa ang unang kasal dahil wala sa edad yung babae. sa madaling salita, sa mata ng batas, walang kasal na namagitan sa kanila. lumalabas na kinasal lamang sila nung 19 na si babae. mabisa ang kasal na yun (assuming na kumuha sila ng marriage license para sa pangalawang kasal), kung kaya't hindi niya pwedeng gawing dahilan ang pagiging minor nung wife nung una sila nagpakasal (not counted kasi yung unang kasal).

 

dahilan dito, hindi ito magagamit bilang basehan para ipawalang-bisa ang kasal niya (ang posibleng gamitin ay psychological incapacity sa panig ng babae dahilan sa panlalalaki nito)

 

sir rocco, querry lng po.

ung friend ko po kc kinasal sila ng wife nya nung 17 pa lng ung babae. tapos, nung 19 na ung wife, kinasal sila uli sa simbahan. gusto na nya hiwalayan ung babae ngaun kc may lalake na ung wife.

pwede ba nya gawing reason ung pagiging minor nung wife nung una sila ngpakasa for nullity? nasa 40's na age nila ngaun.

if ever, naregister ung dalawang kasal, did the second marriage cure the defectin the first marriage? or the second marriage be considered a bigamous one, notwithstanding same ung parties?

thanks in advance po.

more power

Edited April 29, 2011 by rocco69

[transformer]

sir rocco i just want to clarify...nag back read kc ako...may sinabi ka na i check ang married license sa lugar kung saan ito naka rehestro... to find out kung rehestrado ito...

my question is kung may record ka sa NSO ibig ba sabihin 100% percent valid ang kasal...????sa kaso ko kc walang number na nakalagay..nalaman ko lang ito nung nag submmit ako ng married certificate sa school na pinapasukan ng anak ko..nde nila tinanggap yung original ko..thats why i ask a new copy from NSO ..pero same pa rin walang number,,..ang pagkakaiba lang printed ito sa secured paper kaya tinggangap ng school...

[AsILayDying]

Sir, na-pass na ba yung bill sa murang annulment?

 

 

Cheers!

[xavier_xerver]

Mga sir, tanong lang po kung 7 years na kayong hiwalay ng wife mo as in separated.

 

Pwede na po ba itong gawing grounds for filing an annullment?

 

Or kelangan pa rin magproduce ng evidence or ibang grounds for filing the annulment.

 

Salamat po in advance.

[rocco69]

1. kung may record ka sa NSO ibig ba sabihin 100% percent valid ang kasal?

 

hindi. hindi naman requirement para sa validity ng isang kasal ang pagrerehistro sa NSO.

 

para maging mabisa ang kasal, kailangan may kapasidad ang kinasal, may lisensya, may kapangyarihang magkasal ang nagkasal sa mga partido, at may seremonya kung saan tinanggap nila bilang asawa ang isa't-isa (ang NSO registration, di requirement sa bisa ng kasal, pero ito ang matibay na ebidensya na ikaw ay kinasal).

 

kung walang numero ng marriage license sa marriage certificate, check mo sa Civil Registrar kung saan nakarehistro ang kasal mo kung may kopya sila ng license na ginamit sa kasal mo. kung wala, lumalabas na wala kang marriage license. Kung ganun, walang bisa ang kasal mo at pwede kang maghain ng petisyon para ideklarang walang bisa nga ito

 

sir rocco i just want to clarify...nag back read kc ako...may sinabi ka na i check ang married license sa lugar kung saan ito naka rehestro... to find out kung rehestrado ito...

my question is kung may record ka sa NSO ibig ba sabihin 100% percent valid ang kasal...????sa kaso ko kc walang number na nakalagay..nalaman ko lang ito nung nag submmit ako ng married certificate sa school na pinapasukan ng anak ko..nde nila tinanggap yung original ko..thats why i ask a new copy from NSO ..pero same pa rin walang number,,..ang pagkakaiba lang printed ito sa secured paper kaya tinggangap ng school...

[rocco69]

Pwede na po ba itong gawing grounds for filing an annullment?

 

hindi po. kelangan pa rin magproduce ng evidence or ibang grounds for filing the annulment

 

Mga sir, tanong lang po kung 7 years na kayong hiwalay ng wife mo as in separated.

 

Pwede na po ba itong gawing grounds for filing an annullment?

 

Or kelangan pa rin magproduce ng evidence or ibang grounds for filing the annulment.

 

Salamat po in advance.

[jazon7099]

assuming na kinasal sila on or after August 3, 1988 (effectivity ng Family Code), walang bisa ang unang kasal dahil wala sa edad yung babae. sa madaling salita, sa mata ng batas, walang kasal na namagitan sa kanila. lumalabas na kinasal lamang sila nung 19 na si babae. mabisa ang kasal na yun (assuming na kumuha sila ng marriage license para sa pangalawang kasal), kung kaya't hindi niya pwedeng gawing dahilan ang pagiging minor nung wife nung una sila nagpakasal (not counted kasi yung unang kasal).

 

dahilan dito, hindi ito magagamit bilang basehan para ipawalang-bisa ang kasal niya (ang posibleng gamitin ay psychological incapacity sa panig ng babae dahilan sa panlalalaki nito)

 

Maraming salamat po sir rocco