Jongkers Posted January 8, 2010 Author Share Posted January 8, 2010 Thanks, bro. Griffin has been returned to the FA pool.Kay Crab Orange nga yun. Quote Link to comment
dencio Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Aside from Tyreke and Monta, pwede naman yata kahit sino.Depende sa magiging kicker.PM me your proposal po. Commish, let's hold off on that proposal muna. I wanna see how the Crash trade shakes out first. Quote Link to comment
dencio Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 VETOED!! C'mon guys, care to explain why?? Quote Link to comment
kingsville Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Hindi ako yun ah! Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share Posted January 9, 2010 Hindi pala makikita ng commish yung votes? Pero marami yun a. At least five votes ang kelangan e. Quote Link to comment
denimhead Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 VETOED!! C'mon guys, care to explain why?? yeah pls explain .... so decio n his partner can rethink the deal Quote Link to comment
AJBredux Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Malamang nakaapekto ang recent play ni Tyrus. Quote Link to comment
gherome Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 I accepted the deal coz of Tyrus's youth and "potential". plus the definite first rd draft pick. My season's lost anyhow, thus I'm now playing for the future. imho, though it seems like a bit one-sided this season (given Tyrus's miniscule production), i think it's kinda fair - when you'd look at it long term. your thoughts? Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted January 10, 2010 Author Share Posted January 10, 2010 I didn't vote at all. Maybe because I was never a fantasy fan of Crash (yes, despite his current monstrous season).My thinking was the deal would even out eventually in the long-term. Tsaka si Bosh talaga ang gusto ko from dencio's team. Ahaha Quote Link to comment
dencio Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 I accepted the deal coz of Tyrus's youth and "potential". plus the definite first rd draft pick. My season's lost anyhow, thus I'm now playing for the future. imho, though it seems like a bit one-sided this season (given Tyrus's miniscule production), i think it's kinda fair - when you'd look at it long term. your thoughts? I suspect those who vetoed weren't aware of the additional pick as kicker. Nakita na lang nila sa league page and vetoed outright. Please correct me if i'm wrong, fellow GMs. Pards, you still interested? Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted January 10, 2010 Author Share Posted January 10, 2010 I suspect those who vetoed weren't aware of the additional pick as kicker. Nakita na lang nila sa league page and vetoed outright. Please correct me if i'm wrong, fellow GMs. *cut* That's also possible. Quote Link to comment
kingsville Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 ^^ i think it is THE reason why. pwede nio uli gawin yung deal..this time, lagyan nio yung picks sa notes section. and also the changes na rin if there will be. Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 Ganun nga siguro ang dapat nating gawin.If a trade involves picks, have it reflected at the notes section so that the GMs will be informed of all the details.Hindi kasi lahat ay nakakabisita sa MTC pero, presumably, ay nakakabisita sa league page. Quote Link to comment
gherome Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 ^^ but the note already contains the info about the pick. Not sure if the other GMs could view the notes though (if they are not the ones involved in the trade) Quote Link to comment
kingsville Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Umamin na yung nag-vote against dyan! hehehee! and also, they should see the note.. Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 Hmm, parang I don't remember seeing the note nga. Dito rin lang sa thread ako na-inform sa picks involved e. Quote Link to comment
bubuy Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 only the two teams involved in the trade can see the notes.. Quote Link to comment
TripleDouble Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 well, i'd be man enough to admit i vetoed the trade... why? as explained earlier, for me, the talent difference is this far, potential and all considered... im not a fan of picks... but that's just me (and my twisted ideologies), with all due respect, that is... Quote Link to comment
dencio Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 ^^ How about creating a new message and the Commish adding a Commissioner's Note when there are picks involved? Quote Link to comment
dencio Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 well, i'd be man enough to admit i vetoed the trade... why? as explained earlier, for me, the talent difference is this far, potential and all considered... im not a fan of picks... but that's just me (and my twisted ideologies), with all due respect, that is... Thanks for providing your opinion, 3D! I have a question then - for teams that are co-managed, does each co-GM count as a separate vote? Quote Link to comment
TripleDouble Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Thanks for providing your opinion, 3D! I have a question then - for teams that are co-managed, does each co-GM count as a separate vote? i think one team only counts as one vote... i think... again, my apologies for vetoing... Quote Link to comment
AJBredux Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) About re-doing the very same deal, we have sort of an unwritten rule against it in the main dynasty league i.e. that a trade prop recently vetoed by the league should not be submitted again for league approval immediately after it has been vetoed. Ang dating kasi ay parang pinipilit pa sa liga yung trade na kaka-veto lang. If ever you do revisit the trade, tweak it a little or allow circumstances to change first to make the deal more acceptable the second time around. The deal was rejected na; while the veto may indeed suck, that was the decision of the GMs/league and we just have to accept it. Edit: And oh, I do not understand why managers should be apologetic about vetoing deals. Its a manager's right to vote for or against any particular deal. Edited January 11, 2010 by AJBredux Quote Link to comment
TripleDouble Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 About re-doing the very same deal, we have sort of an unwritten rule against it in the main dynasty league i.e. that a trade prop recently vetoed by the league should not be submitted again for league approval immediately after it has been vetoed. Ang dating kasi ay parang pinipilit pa sa liga yung trade na kaka-veto lang. If ever you do revisit the trade, tweak it a little or allow circumstances to change first to make the deal more acceptable the second time around. The deal was rejected na; while the veto may indeed suck, that was the decision of the GMs/league and we just have to accept it. Edit: And oh, I do not understand why managers should be apologetic about vetoing deals. Its a manager's right to vote for or against any particular deal. well, i apologized since, well, i think both have their respective motives with the deal... as "uneven" as it may seem (which we, fellow managers decide on), it hurts to have your proposal "rejected"... yun lang po :hypocritesmiley: Quote Link to comment
dencio Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Yeah, no need for apologies sirs. Mas maganda lang siguro if the GMs express their opinions for vetoing. At least the trading teams can get an idea if ever they would want to re-think their deal. Also, na-a-alala sa mga leagues last year, nililista natin yung mga For and Against sa mga trades, sana ibalik natin 'yun. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.