Vegasboy32 Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 Dapat kasi pedeng ihabla ng taong bayan ang gobyerno at mga govt employees and officials na umaabuso sa pwesto. Tulad na lang nitong customs employee na kala mo kung sino maka asta at nagdadrive ng porsche. Dapat sa mga ganyan bitayin. Kaya ganyan ang mga nasa pwesto sa atin alam nila hindi sila mabubuweltahan. Pero kung alam nilang pede silang bweltahan e di titino din yan. Quote Link to comment
sandy51 Posted February 14, 2012 Share Posted February 14, 2012 I want a law that will empower even the ordinary Filipino to AUDIT the earnings of any government official. And that this law will FORCE the Government Official to cooperate without delay. In theory meyroon na nito - Code of Conduct for Government Employees (Section 5(e) RA 6715, Feb 20, 1989). Even without the Freedom of Information Bill, some things are possible, but if even with current laws wala din, what makes us think that everything will be solved by a FOI? Quote Link to comment
sandy51 Posted February 14, 2012 Share Posted February 14, 2012 Gaining from an experience at the Impreacment Trial, now is the time for the House members of the prosecution panel to propose an amendment to the laws on bank secrecy. Nevermind whether it passes or not. Nevermind that it will not affect the present Corona case. What is important is to show the sincerity in all this. So, when do you think will I see this proposal? Quote Link to comment
camiar Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I want a law that LIMITS the amount of assets that can be earned by a FOREIGN NATIONAL or a FOREIGN NATIONAL who got married to a Philippine National. And that those properties that went BEYOND the limit be CONFISCATED and converted into cash for the construction of government schools and government medical facilities. That would be a sure-fire way of inhibiting business initiatives. That in essence what the communist regimes want to do, not just to foreign investments, but to their citizens' businesses as well. Look where they are now. Quote Link to comment
Vegasboy32 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 actually kung batas lang ang pinag-uusapan, isa na ang mahal nating pilipinas na napakaraming batas. ang numero unong problema lamang ay ang striktong pagpapatupad nito.ika nga eh, bihira ang nasasampolan kapag ikaw ay lumabag. so karamihan ng tao ang iniisip, ok lang yan bakit si ganito ginagawa yan, eh wala namang nangyayari para mapigilan sya.Sa isang salita yung enforcement ang may diperensya. ang pangalawa, gumawa nga ng batas, eh wala namang perang inilaan para maipatupad ito. ibig sabihin ilang taon ang lilipas bago pa talaga marealize ang objective ng batas na ito. mismo. wala kasing nag eenforce ng laws sa atin. yan ang masama Quote Link to comment
CharlesOngSy Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Ban philanderers from holding public office Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Death penalty for corrupt gov't officials Quote Link to comment
sandy51 Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 Ban philanderers from holding public office Unfortunately, the majority of Filipinos see nothing wrong with philanderers. Let's see. Um, they voted for Erap, Revilla, and who else? Quote Link to comment
CharlesOngSy Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 Ibalik ang Death Penalty Quote Link to comment
uaeboy25 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Bawal magtakip ng tenga sa korte Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted March 1, 2012 Share Posted March 1, 2012 Raise the punishment of simple crimes. Maybe imitate Singapore. Quote Link to comment
sandy51 Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 I hope we can take a second look at the Contitutional provision on the Judicial and Bar Council. The President appoints members in the judiciary based on the recommendation of the JBC (at least in theory). But out of the 8 members in the JBC, only 3 ex-oficio members may be considered independent. The 5 others (to include the ex-officio Justice Secretary) are appointed by the Presdent. BTW, per the Constitution, there are only supposed to be 7 members (the eight being the Council Secretary who is the ex-officio Clerk of the Supreme Court). Presently, there are two members of Congress who are members of the JBC - one from the House and one from the Senate. If this was the intention of the Constitution, why does it say "and a representative of the Congress" and not "and representatives of the Congress"? This is the provision of Article VIII that I refer to:Section 8. (1) A Judicial and Bar Council is hereby created under the supervision of the Supreme Court composed of the Chief Justice as ex officio Chairman, the Secretary of Justice, and a representative of the Congress as ex officio Members, a representative of the Integrated Bar, a professor of law, a retired Member of the Supreme Court, and a representative of the private sector. Quote Link to comment
SaintPeter5858 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 A Law to triple the monetary penalty for bail Quote Link to comment
sandy51 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 Puede bang repeal a law? Repeal the Lina law. A lot call it "the stupid Lina Law" but as far as I know, Lina did not do it all by himself. Majority of Congressmen endorsed it; the Senate passed it; and finally the President signed it into law. Therefore, if it is a stupid law, other people were just as stupid. Granting that it truly is stupid, I wonder why it is not being repealed. And I wonder why those who do not repeal it continue to be voted in Quote Link to comment
U.P. AdMU2008 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Ban all corrupt officials from running again! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.