keenpee

Wala na pong sumasagot dito.

Hi Wala na pong sumasagot dito?

hello ask ko lang when do bir charge VAT on a property sale?

Quote keenpee Posted November 14 New question po, Meron kaming matagal na Kaso before, nagkaron Ng decision some time 2001-2003. Final and executory. Kaso di inasikaso Ng atty Kasi di daw nya alam sino and saan sisingilin. Ung decision states something like this Kami ung rightful owner as second intervenor Tapos merong mga penalties And ung reversion Ng govt sa lote ay denied. So ang question is kung ang habol lang namin ay ung Rightful onwership and reversion denied. 1.Ok lang ba na di nailakad na ung EXECUTION step? Kasi naglapsed na din ung 10 year para buhayin Nagtanong Kasi Ako sa RTC branch na may hawak nun. Di daw need execute kung ownership daw Kasi Wala daw gagawin dun? 2. Meron pa ba bisa ung decision kahit walang execution on the ownership decision?

hi anu pued gawin bukod sa pagkaso. sakaling merong illegal settlers sa lote. tapos among the illegal settlers merong nagbabayad ng amliyar ng owner, three years advance magbayad so di nauunahan ng owner. what can be done by the owner.

hi anu pued gawin bukod sa pagkaso. sakaling merong illegal settlers sa lote. tapos among the illegal settlers merong nagbabayad ng amliyar ng owner, three years advance magbayad so di nauunahan ng owner. what can be done by the owner.

New question po, Meron kaming matagal na Kaso before, nagkaron Ng decision some time 2001-2003. Final and executory. Kaso di inasikaso Ng atty Kasi di daw nya alam sino and saan sisingilin. Ung decision states something like this Kami ung rightful owner as second intervenor Tapos merong mga penalties And ung reversion Ng govt sa lote ay denied. So ang question is kung ang habol lang namin ay ung Rightful onwership and reversion denied. 1.Ok lang ba na di nailakad na ung EXECUTION step? Kasi naglapsed na din ung 10 year para buhayin Nagtanong Kasi Ako sa RTC branch na may hawak nun. Di daw need execute kung ownership daw Kasi Wala daw gagawin dun? 2. Meron pa ba bisa ung decision kahit walang execution on the ownership decision?

Ok na masters meron na pala since aug, di kami binigyan Ng court Ng copy kahit nagfollow up kami.

Another question masters, Title name example Mr. A married to mam B, et al. Kapag nagbenta po ba ng real property. Damay ba ung wife mam B sa tax need pa ba bir tin ni mam B? And Or need pa ba signature ni mam B when the transfer before involved only Mr A?

hi masters, question regarding issuance of certificate of finality and writ of execution. i would like to know anu pued gawin in this situation, kasi august first week pa nilabas ng court ung order na granted na both documents, ung defense nagfile ng pleading kaso denied ulit. so i made a follow up personally oct and up to now wala pa din, ganon din gawa ng atty namin, follow up but still sabi lang ng court staff they will update kung meron na. anu pa pued gawin para gawan na kasi matagal na pending. thank you

hi, pano pala kung walang clause or provision, pano magiging usapan if within the term, the owners decided to discontinue the contract? anu pued mga options?

Question po sa apartment condo leasing business namin. Meron kami natanggap na Notice from National Water Resources Board-DENR, asking us to comply for acquiring Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. How come hinhingan kami ng ganito when we are only passing the water from maynilad to tenants. Si maynilad po ung ayaw magconnect ng individual meters for each unit. Required ba ito sa lahat ng nagpapalease ng units?

Under rule 38 if filed Can they use the previous evidences and say now lang nila nacheck or need new evidences?

Kapag meron na finality can they file this as they are illegal settlers.

Pued po ba ito?

Defendants ung nakapossess ng property and sya ung complained party or defendant. Kapag nailabas na ung finality or entry of judgment can they use the evidences presented during the trial again sa petition for relief of judgement rule 38. Example exhibit A which has been presented and heard during actual trial. And they are not part of the document. Questions 1) can they still use the evidences sa formal offer ng plaintiffs for this rule 38 or need new evidence? Since napagusapan na ung mga evidences during regular trial can they dig the previous evidences and say ' ay may nakita kami na kaduda duda.' when their chance to check the docs has lapsed? 2) they are not part of the documents since illegal settlers sila their documents points to another lot. Tia

Ah yung question po sa rule 38 not the threat

Any suggestion for this?

I mean baliktad po. Kami ung owner. Illegal settlers occupying our lot. When we entered, threaten nya kami. Can we file criminal charges for the threatening?

No future crime naman po. Pero the atty that may testify handled a land dispute case. The new case naman may involve the prev client of the atty or the atty knows private personal info of the client. Baka hanapin lang sya ng party to testify. Pued po ba?

Can an atty testify about a case he handled before or share info about the previous case for a case that involves his or her clients?

can i file for criminal case for an illegal settler threatening the owners upon entering the lots owned by the owners? meron blotter sa barangay. several years way back

can i ask if defendant can file for petition for relief of judgment rule 38 sa kapag meron issue sa docs that was filed as formal exhibit by the plaintiffs way back from the start of the hearing? if they claim meritorious reason for fame the defendants are not part of the doc as they are illegal settlers.

kapag ung kaso and ung requesting party ay si defendant pero si defendant ay illegal settler. can they request it