hidden_agenda Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Stipulation pour autri ay isang sugnay o bahagi ng kontrata, kung saan binibigyan ng mga partido sa kontrata ng benepisyo ang isang tao na di naman kasali sa kontrata. Ibig sabihin, hindi siya kasali sa kontrata, pero pinapaboran siya ng kontrata (kailangang sinasadya talaga siyang bigyan ng benepisyo ng kontrata) Example: credit card ang may kontrata dito ay ang credit card company at yung establishment (kung saan napagkasunduan nila na kung sino man ay ang makapagpapakita ng credit card sa establishment igagalang ito ng tindahan at tatanggapin nila ito bilang kabayaran) yung may hawak ng credit card ay beneficiary. ang nag-uusap talaga ay yung credit card company at yung establishment.maraming salamat sir, mabuhay ka, thank you po ulet Quote Link to comment
Ron Paparoon Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 Sir/Ma'am:Can anyone here help a female friend? She badly need a good lawyer for sexual harassment vs. her former boss. Former boss since she was detailed to another office after filing a formal complaint. Now she feels like the odds are favoring the boss, well as we all know, power and influence.She has nothing much to offer, and I would help out if ever. Lalake ako and may kalokohan but I hate abuse, violence and harassment towards women.I hope someone would help.Thanks. 1 Quote Link to comment
oliverjohnholmes Posted November 10, 2017 Share Posted November 10, 2017 Question lang po. Ang articles of incorporation po ba ay enforcible kahit sa ibang bansa? Quote Link to comment
Kazekage.Gaara Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 I got a question regarding SSS pension.My dad passed away last year. Unknowingly, may ibang name na nakalagay sa beneficiary nya na hindi nya inayos. Now, me and my mom are unsure kung ano ang marital status ng dad ko dun sa name na nakalagay sa beneficiary. May habol ba kami sa pension ng dad ko? Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 I got a question regarding SSS pension. My dad passed away last year. Unknowingly, may ibang name na nakalagay sa beneficiary nya na hindi nya inayos. Now, me and my mom are unsure kung ano ang marital status ng dad ko dun sa name na nakalagay sa beneficiary. May habol ba kami sa pension ng dad ko?ang unang beneficary ng SSS member ay ang kaniyang asawa at mga anak na ang edad ay mas mababa sa 21. Sila muna ang may karapatan bago yung nakalista na beneficiary. Kung walang primary beneficiary, dun lang nakakapasok yung nakalistang beneficiary. Pinakamaganda niyan, tumawag sa SSS at magtanong dun Quote Link to comment
wildswans Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 Hi there. I have some questions regarding property leasing. A guy and his wife, newlyweds, wants to lease a property from my parents but he said he doesn't have bank checks yet. So he plans to let her father issue the post-dated checks and will be paying his dad in cash monthly. My parents plan to put the names of the son and his father in the contract as lessee, is it legally ok if only the son signs the contract as the lessee even if the checks are from his father's account or should the father sign as lessee as well? My parents had an experience before where they put two people as the lessee but the one who signs the contract is also the one who issued the checks. A Any info will be appreciated. Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 Hi there. I have some questions regarding property leasing. A guy and his wife, newlyweds, wants to lease a property from my parents but he said he doesn't have bank checks yet. So he plans to let her father issue the post-dated checks and will be paying his dad in cash monthly. My parents plan to put the names of the son and his father in the contract as lessee, is it legally ok if only the son signs the contract as the lessee even if the checks are from his father's account or should the father sign as lessee as well? My parents had an experience before where they put two people as the lessee but the one who signs the contract is also the one who issued the checks. A Any info will be appreciated.no problem whether the father is included as a lessee or not, the important thing is he issues checks in favor of the landlord. The Bouncing Check Law doesn't really care whether the person issuing the check benefited/profited from the transaction. So long as he issued the check, and the same bounces, the issuer becomes liable (yan lang naman ang habol ng humihingi ng check, yug maaari niyang kasuhan ng KRIMINAL yung nag-issue ng check. May kulong kasi pag talbog na cheke, kaya mas madaling maningil). If you want, you can state in the Lease Contract that payments will be made by check issued by the father of the tenant. Quote Link to comment
wildswans Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 no problem whether the father is included as a lessee or not, the important thing is he issues checks in favor of the landlord. The Bouncing Check Law doesn't really care whether the person issuing the check benefited/profited from the transaction. So long as he issued the check, and the same bounces, the issuer becomes liable (yan lang naman ang habol ng humihingi ng check, yug maaari niyang kasuhan ng KRIMINAL yung nag-issue ng check. May kulong kasi pag talbog na cheke, kaya mas madaling maningil). If you want, you can state in the Lease Contract that payments will be made by check issued by the father of the tenant.Thank you sir. One last question, your reply took care of, in case, his father's checks bounced, but what about eviction? Kapag hindi na nakakapagbayad, bp22 will be used but will there be any legal problem or hindrance for evicting the son since he solely signed as the lessee but the checks are from his father and we put a clause in the contract that the checks of the father will be used? Quote Link to comment
villain1021 Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 hi mga lawyers jan.. need po sana ng services annulment process po. 15yrs nang hiwalay pm na lang po Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted December 21, 2017 Share Posted December 21, 2017 (edited) Thank you sir. One last question, your reply took care of, in case, his father's checks bounced, but what about eviction? Kapag hindi na nakakapagbayad, bp22 will be used but will there be any legal problem or hindrance for evicting the son since he solely signed as the lessee but the checks are from his father and we put a clause in the contract that the checks of the father will be used?shouldn't be a problem. even if the checks are issued by his father, eviction for nonpayment would require that the tenant prove he has paid the rentals. Ano ang proof niya na nagbayad na siya? Since talbog yung cheke, he has no proof of payment, unless he pays the rent himself (which would then solve the problem). In fine, OK lang yung checks issued by the father as payment, if the checks bounce, you can opt to file an eviction case, as well as for BP22. Edited December 21, 2017 by rocco69 Quote Link to comment
wildswans Posted December 21, 2017 Share Posted December 21, 2017 (edited) shouldn't be a problem. even if the checks are issued by his father, eviction for nonpayment would require that the tenant prove he has paid the rentals. Ano ang proof niya na nagbayad na siya? Since talbog yung cheke, he has no proof of payment, unless he pays the rent himself (which would then solve the problem). In fine, OK lang yung checks issued by the father as payment, if the checks bounce, you can opt to file an eviction case, as well as for BP22. Thank you very much sir for the information. Edited December 21, 2017 by wildswans Quote Link to comment
thatHelmetGuy11 Posted December 27, 2017 Share Posted December 27, 2017 hi mga atty. pwede po humingi ng advise? my friend applied to work in japan. however, the agency has a program that all applicants must be be sent to their japanese principal to undergo "Internship training" (paid) for 3 years before sya iforward at ihire ng isang japanese company. sadly, he was unable to finish the training kasi nahuli sya ng japanese police n ngddrive ng sskyan ng wlang lisensya. he was jailed tpos pinauwi n dto s pinas, effectively terminating his internship. the agency is now suing him for breach of contract daw. any advise po? thanks in advance! Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 (edited) hi mga atty. pwede po humingi ng advise? my friend applied to work in japan. however, the agency has a program that all applicants must be be sent to their japanese principal to undergo "Internship training" (paid) for 3 years before sya iforward at ihire ng isang japanese company. sadly, he was unable to finish the training kasi nahuli sya ng japanese police n ngddrive ng sskyan ng wlang lisensya. he was jailed tpos pinauwi n dto s pinas, effectively terminating his internship. the agency is now suing him for breach of contract daw. any advise po? thanks in advance!it depends on what are the terms of the contract that he signed. Is there a clause exempting him due to reasons beyond his control, etc. Whar are his responsibilities and duties under the contract? What are the causes consisting breach of the contract? Hangga't hindi nakikita yung mismong kontrata, mahirap magbigay ng advise. But in any case, kung wala namang ari-arian ang kaibigan mo, useless yang breach of contract case na yan, manalo man sila, ang pwede lang nila makuha ay daños, in the form of money (walang kulong sa civil case. At civil case lang ang breach of contract). Kung walang pera o ari-arian ang kaibigan, ano ang kukunin sa kanya ng agency? Wala. In ending, gagastos lang yung agency sa wala. Kung ako kaibigan mo, wag na niya pansinin ang demands ng agency (at sigurado ako, demand letter pa lang yan, wala pang naisasampa na kaso yan - dahil nga waste of time and money ang ganyang kaso, walang kasiguraduhan na makakakolekta ang naghahabla). Edited December 29, 2017 by rocco69 Quote Link to comment
wildswans Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Hi sir. I have two questions. 1. Is proper for a locally registered company to ask for an NBI clearance from its homebased online workers? The workers are signed as "Independen Service Provider" and the contract states "no employer-employee" relationship so meaning Freelance. 2. With many deadly accidents happening recently, I can't help but notice that the party who is not as fault is often charged with "reckless imprudence resulting to homicide" or "reckless imprudence resulting to physical injuries" when the party at fault suffers some casualties and is the one to blame. Is this really a law in our country? If so, how can a completely innocent party defend itself from such a case? Because it seems this law was made so that the one at fault can get some financial assistance from the innocent party which I think is unfair and nonsense. Thanks for any info. Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 Hi sir. I have two questions. 1. Is proper for a locally registered company to ask for an NBI clearance from its homebased online workers? The workers are signed as "Independen Service Provider" and the contract states "no employer-employee" relationship so meaning Freelance. 2. With many deadly accidents happening recently, I can't help but notice that the party who is not as fault is often charged with "reckless imprudence resulting to homicide" or "reckless imprudence resulting to physical injuries" when the party at fault suffers some casualties and is the one to blame. Is this really a law in our country? If so, how can a completely innocent party defend itself from such a case? Because it seems this law was made so that the one at fault can get some financial assistance from the innocent party which I think is unfair and nonsense. Thanks for any info.1. Is [it] proper for a locally registered company to ask for an NBI clearance from its homebased online workers?Yes. Its their job offer. They can require whatever they want from interested applicants, so long as the same is legal and reasonable. NBI clearance is a reasonable and legal requirement. If you don't want to comply, you are free not to apply. 2. Is this really a law in our country?I think it is SOP for police authorities to charge the driver if someone is injured/dies in a vehicular accident, the thinking being "let the judge decide who is at fault", at least no one can claim the police were negligent or were bribed not to file charges. Its basically to ensure their A$$es are covered. 3. If so, how can a completely innocent party defend itself from such a case?Present evidence to show that you were not at fault/negligent. If the person charged is not at fault, the physical evidence will show it. In most cases, the complainant will also be unable to show that the other party was at fault. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.