legal Free Legal Advice

[Dr_PepPeR]

Is there anyone here who would be kind enough to provide me with a copy of a settlement agreement?

 

What kind of a settlement contract?

[eastern]

@cHinitababe86

 

 

a marriage is not voided simply because hindi magkasama ung husband and wife or wala silang communication. if walang communication, i think there must be reason to believe that the other party is dead, a diligent search is made and judicial declaration of nullity of the marriage. given the facts of that case, i doubt it if that marriage could be subject to annulment

[cHinitababe86]

@cHinitababe86

 

 

a marriage is not voided simply because hindi magkasama ung husband and wife or wala silang communication. if walang communication, i think there must be reason to believe that the other party is dead, a diligent search is made and judicial declaration of nullity of the marriage. given the facts of that case, i doubt it if that marriage could be subject to annulment

 

hindi ba bigamy ang kaso run? or adultery?

 

kung dadaanin rin sa legal process, i think

yang dalawang mentioned pwede i-file na complaint

knowing na may anak na ung guy sa ibang babae..

as well as binabahay. pwede rin gamitin ang phone bills

na patunay sa numerous phone calls na nangyayari..

my friend even had a private investagator and got pictures

as evidences.

 

may pagtataksil na nangyari, na behind my friend's back,

matagal na pala siyang niloloko ng asawa nya

 

so paano ang magiging legal process pag nag file ng annulment?

since malabo na pala na hindi dadaan sa annulment ang pagpapa

void ng kasal nila

Edited June 9, 2009 by cHinitababe86

[jombratero]

Hi,

 

Im a survivor in the MB Commando 6 ferry sinking, the provincial office of Batangas has called all those who survived in the sinking, and were confused on how are we going to handle the issue. Whats the best thing to do? get one lawyer for all of us to represent us in the case? or get different ones per group? We all have different situations since some has lost lives and some groups did not, but we all wanted to file a case because of the trauma that happened to us and also to the damages to our belongings. What are our chances too? There is evidence that they overloaded the boat, since the manifest and the rescue report shows that the boat carried more than what was allowed.

 

Thanks.

[-wet-]

i hope im right with this cHinitababe86. just my knowledge. himayin natin...

 

pinatapatanong ng friend ko, she's married, after several years of happy married life, nagkaron ng madameng problema, nambababae ang asawa nya, may ibinahay, nalaman nalang nya, may anak na pala ang asawa nya sa iba..itinago un sakanya ng 3years.. until dumating ung time na nakita nya sa isang mall ung asawa niya with the other woman and the baby boy.

 

u must have proofs for this. seeing the husband in a mall (or even just outside a hotel or places to hook up) with a woman and a boy is not enough. sori pero minsan kailangan pang makita nya mismo nakahubad sila pareho sa isang kwarto. kainis noh?

 

anu anung laban nya run at pwede nya makuhang support since may anak din sila? at kung may ikakaso siya sa asawa nya, anu-ano un?

 

takutin nya muna. send him demand letters for support and state that she knows what's going on. add also into it that she has evidences (kahit wala pa). tapos pag matigas, i think the "anti-violence against women and children" (ra 9262) fits (girls, wag nyo abusuhin tong batas na ito ha, kawawa naman kaming mga lalake ). and siguro concubinage for the woman (if she knows he's married). haha it's payback time!

 

after rin nung pangyayari, nakamove on na siya, and nagkanya2 na sila at may boyfriend na siya ulit ilang years na.

 

naku, wag na wag sha magpapakitang may kinakasama sha hanggat married sila, pag hetong lalake na praning pwede syang kasuhan ng adultery. sensha na, pero medjo bias ang batas ng pinas.

 

kung hindi rin dadaan ng annulment ang kasal nila, gaano katagal bago ma void ang marriage nila at paano ang conditions para ma void un since gusto nila magkasal..? may narinig kasi ako na pag ilang years hindi magkasama o wala nang communication, nagiging void ang kasal.. how is that?

 

sa tingin ko it's not annulment. it's more of legal separation. sadly sa case na to hinde ata pwedeng ma-void ang kasal.

 

still, there are ways naman to have an annulment, pero magastos.

 

can someone clear this issue? thanks

 

pm mo ako if you need someone to help you. i have batteries of lawyers that can help you. kasi mas alam nila. ako, epal lang hehe! hinde ko forte to eh.

[mr. john]

tanung ko lang po..

scenario:

yung gf ko kaka alis lang last june 6, 2009 as immigrant..pinetetion kasi siya ng parents nya..need to stay there for 5 years i think..my question is this..what if i go to the states as a tourist and we get married immediately sa states..magiging US citizen na ba ako immediately? is it legal? para i can stay there na for good..need clarifications..thanks in advance

[wating94]

meron ba magbabar exam d2?

[ghetto_gospel]

i need help ASAP!

 

can anyone here educate me about the non compete law here in the philippines??? thanks!

[Dr_PepPeR]

i need help ASAP!

 

can anyone here educate me about the non compete law here in the philippines??? thanks!

 

Do you mean a non-competition clause in a contract? Can you be more specific?

[ghetto_gospel]

Do you mean a non-competition clause in a contract? Can you be more specific?

 

 

i don't know if it's the same, but here's the issue...

 

I used to work in an american company, BPO. it's a sales oriented company and i was in the sales dept. for the past few years, i was able to build my own book of business. last may 19, i resigned from the company, and now, i'm planning to work for another company with the same line of business having my original book of business as my client base there. can i do that???

[johcorn5]

Hi. Would someone with legal knowledge help, thanks. My wife has three siblings, and one sister is living with her father taking care of their 92 year old father who is not yet sickly, just old. My wife is the youngest and with the consent of her father demolished their very dilapitated house and constructed a new bungalow in the 700 square meter lot. The house is about 120 square meters in floor area and constructed in the front part of the lot. Now the only brother is running berserk saying the sister living with the father should vacate the house because he owns the property by virtue of being the sole son(is there a law in the Philippines that states that the only son should be the sole heir). The brother works in Manila but visits the father once in two years or less(Laguna). Even before the new house was constructed the brother was selling the property, luckily was not sold. The property is just documented and not yet titled under the name of the father and his deceased wife. What should my wife do so that her brother could not sell the property? Can the father make a will of testament stating that the property (house and 250 square meters lot inclusive) be awarded to the sister taking care of him and the rest(450 sq meters) be awarded to the three other siblings. My wife spent all for the construction of the house and not a single cent came from the rest of the siblings. She is not interested in any inheritance, she is just protecting that the property not be sold by the brother. Is making such a testament by a still healthy and right minded 92 year old man legal and acceptable by the law and binding with regards to the berserk brother. Thank you very much and sorry for the long story. Please help.

[Dr_PepPeR]

i don't know if it's the same, but here's the issue...

 

I used to work in an american company, BPO. it's a sales oriented company and i was in the sales dept. for the past few years, i was able to build my own book of business. last may 19, i resigned from the company, and now, i'm planning to work for another company with the same line of business having my original book of business as my client base there. can i do that???

 

IMHO as long as you didn't sign a contrct with your previous company that prohibits you from working in the same line of business, then you can do so legally. Morally, it's up to you.

[ghetto_gospel]

IMHO as long as you didn't sign a contrct with your previous company that prohibits you from working in the same line of business, then you can do so legally. Morally, it's up to you.

 

i understand. thank you.

[redax]

Hi. Would someone with legal knowledge help, thanks. My wife has three siblings, and one sister is living with her father taking care of their 92 year old father who is not yet sickly, just old. My wife is the youngest and with the consent of her father demolished their very dilapitated house and constructed a new bungalow in the 700 square meter lot. The house is about 120 square meters in floor area and constructed in the front part of the lot. Now the only brother is running berserk saying the sister living with the father should vacate the house because he owns the property by virtue of being the sole son(is there a law in the Philippines that states that the only son should be the sole heir). The brother works in Manila but visits the father once in two years or less(Laguna). Even before the new house was constructed the brother was selling the property, luckily was not sold. The property is just documented and not yet titled under the name of the father and his deceased wife. What should my wife do so that her brother could not sell the property? Can the father make a will of testament stating that the property (house and 250 square meters lot inclusive) be awarded to the sister taking care of him and the rest(450 sq meters) be awarded to the three other siblings. My wife spent all for the construction of the house and not a single cent came from the rest of the siblings. She is not interested in any inheritance, she is just protecting that the property not be sold by the brother. Is making such a testament by a still healthy and right minded 92 year old man legal and acceptable by the law and binding with regards to the berserk brother. Thank you very much and sorry for the long story. Please help.

Under the law a son even if he is the eldest, has no more right than the other full blood siblings, may they be male or female. All sons and daughters are considered compulsory heirs who are entitled to their legitimes as provided by law. One half of the hereditary estate of the father is the legitime of the legitimate children. The other half, the father can do as he pleases, subject to the rights of illegitimate children and the surviving spouse as provided by the Civil Code. Since the father is still alive, he should settle the issue regarding the lot and the improvement which your wife introduced to the lot. The son could not sell the lot because he is not the owner of the lot. No buyer will buy the lot from him if they know the circumstances of the property. Your wife should make an arrangement with her dad that the area of the lot where she contructed a house should go to her so that whe will be able to enjoy its use. She should have made the arrangement before contructing the house to be sure it will go to her. If she wouldn't be able to get her dad to an arrangement of the lot where the house stands, it will become complicated if the other siblings don't agree that the lot should go to her, after the dad passes away.

Edited June 15, 2009 by redax

[johcorn5]

Under the law a son even if he is the eldest, has no more right than the other full blood siblings, may they be male or female. All sons and daughters are considered compulsory heirs who are entitled to their legitimes as provided by law. One half of the hereditary estate of the father is the legitime of the legitimate children. The other half, the father can do as he pleases, subject to the rights of illegitimate children and the surviving spouse as provided by the Civil Code. Since the father is still alive, he should settle the issue regarding the lot and the improvement which your wife introduced to the lot. The son could not sell the lot because he is not the owner of the lot. No buyer will buy the lot from him if they know the circumstances of the property. Your wife should make an arrangement with her dad that the area of the lot where she contructed a house should go to her so that whe will be able to enjoy its use. She should have made the arrangement before contructing the house to be sure it will go to her. If she wouldn't be able to get her dad to an arrangement of the lot where the house stands, it will become complicated if the other siblings don't agree that the lot should go to her, after the dad passes away.

 

Thank you very much for the clarification and advise. It was a big help. More power to people like you and God Bless.