legal Free Legal Advice

[wrecker]

ung company namin at union ay nagkaroon ng CBA nung 2007,ang effectivity ay till 2010,kasam sa nagpakasunduan ay yung increase namin this year,kaso,di pa binibigay ng management,kasi daw crisis,,ang kwestyon pwede ba namnin yun habulin,pati retro fromn jan 2009 up to present,,sabi ng union,strikekable dun un ginawa ng management,,tama ba yun?hanggang ngayon kasi,wala pa akson union namin.

 

normally its will be discussed muna sa management - labor counsel, then kung d talaga maayos, thats a strikeable issue. you file a notice of strike sa NCMB.

[flashspeed229]

This is a difficult situation. All I can recommend without anything illegal is that explain in the first enrollment, the parents of the child were separated and that out of spite, you chose to use a different surname. Explain to the second school, that you had the NSO all the while and that you enrolled in the first school with your surname to hide the child from the father. Now, that the second school is asking for an NSO, you present the same. Just make an affidavit that the kid is one and the same as in the records of the first school. It's best to come up with a story with the documents you had than to make up the documents for the story you want.

 

Thanks for the advice Roubaix

[basic_instinct]

Ask ko lang po kung sino may karapatan sa custody ng baby. Kasi friend ko pong babae eh gusto humiwalay na sa kinakasama nyang lalaki. Kakapanganak nya lang po at gusto nya ng hiwalayan kasi unplanned pregnancy nangyari. Di pa po sila kasal at ang depensa ng lalaki na sa kanya yung baby mapunta dahil may ibang lalaki itong si girl na totoong mayroon nga.

[basic_instinct]

Sa above post ko po kung mapunta man sa mother ang bata may habol po ba ang father ng bata

 

and what are the circumstances for the father para mahabol nya ang custody bata sa from her mother

Edited May 13, 2009 by basic_instinct

[basic_instinct]

Paano po kung yung name ng lalaki eh nasa birth certificate na?

[muffin]

to all the marriage/annulment experts:

 

Just want to ask if a person is married at 22 and he or she had his parental consent forged, is that a valid ground for annulment or is the marriage automatically void?

[moed]

No. Only persons 18 and above but below 21 who get married need parental consent.

Edited May 14, 2009 by moed

[GODzilla]

Ask ko lang po kung sino may karapatan sa custody ng baby. Kasi friend ko pong babae eh gusto humiwalay na sa kinakasama nyang lalaki. Kakapanganak nya lang po at gusto nya ng hiwalayan kasi unplanned pregnancy nangyari. Di pa po sila kasal at ang depensa ng lalaki na sa kanya yung baby mapunta dahil may ibang lalaki itong si girl na totoong mayroon nga.

 

The custody over illegitimate children or those born out of wedlock are almost always awarded to the mother. Unless it can be shown that she is unfit or that the general welfare of the child is best served if someone else takes care of her/him.

 

The fact that the father acknowledged the child to be his or that the mother is now with another man is not enough ground to deprive her of the right/custody over said child.

[GODzilla]

to all the marriage/annulment experts:

 

Just want to ask if a person is married at 22 and he or she had his parental consent forged, is that a valid ground for annulment or is the marriage automatically void?

 

NO. since he/she is over 21 years old already at the time and a defect in the parental ADVICE is not a ground for annulment. Furthermore, no marriage is AUTOMATICALLY void. There must still be a judicial declaration to that effect. In other words, the courts must first declare said marriage to be null and void.

[basic_instinct]

Thank you po

[muffin]

No. Only persons 18 and above but below 21 who get married need parental consent.

 

what about parental advice?

[muffin]

NO. since he/she is over 21 years old already at the time and a defect in the parental ADVICE is not a ground for annulment. Furthermore, no marriage is AUTOMATICALLY void. There must still be a judicial declaration to that effect. In other words, the courts must first declare said marriage to be null and void.

 

 

What's the use of having the parents sign a parental advice then if a defect in it is not a ground for annulment?

 

How much is an annulment nowadays that wouldn't require you to have personal appearance? Any contacts to help my friend? Please PM me... thanks!

[anjinsan]

sir. i have a friend na may baby less than a year old. isinunod yung apelyido ng baby sa father ng baby although theyre not married and just lived-in together for only three months. ngayon hiwalay na sila and hindi naman nagbibigay ng sustento yung father ng baby. can she still change the surname of her baby to her surname? what future complications will she encounter if ever? thanks in advance

 

can anyone answer this?

[redax]

What's the use of having the parents sign a parental advice then if a defect in it is not a ground for annulment?

 

How much is an annulment nowadays that wouldn't require you to have personal appearance? Any contacts to help my friend? Please PM me... thanks!

 

Lack of parental consent when required makes the marriage voidable.

Parental advice, again when required, is only a requisite for the issuance of a marriage license. If parties are able to acquire a license even without the required parental consent, the marriage is valid.

[freelicker]

QUOTE (handlewithcare @ Apr 25 2009, 10:00 AM)

sir. i have a friend na may baby less than a year old. isinunod yung apelyido ng baby sa father ng baby although theyre not married and just lived-in together for only three months. ngayon hiwalay na sila and hindi naman nagbibigay ng sustento yung father ng baby. can she still change the surname of her baby to her surname? what future complications will she encounter if ever? thanks in advance

 

 

can anyone answer this?

 

There are several ways of correcting the same (not considering the consequences). The first is to file for correction of entry with the LCR claiming that the entry was inadvertent. You can try to use the argument that because the parents are not married, then the child should follow the name of the mother and not the father. This alternative would not be too costly or difficult because it is an administrative correction.

 

The second way would be more costly and time consuming. This would entail filing a court case to correct the entry showing that there was a material error in the birth certificate of the child. This would require a court hearing and as such a lawyer needs to be hired for the same. However, this is a safer alternative inasmuch as the correction will be ordered by the court.

 

The consequence of these actions would be that if the father objects to the same, then there might be a legal battle that can end up with a criminal case of falsification of a public document (the birth certificate).

 

The other legal eagles here might be able to add some more thoughts.