VentureMaker Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Is it legal to publish the name and picture of a separated employee stating that she is no longer connected with the company? Many people assume the person was terminated for a crime! Quote Link to comment
jackbrng Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Is it legal to publish the name and picture of a separated employee stating that she is no longer connected with the company? Many people assume the person was terminated for a crime! no, ok lang yon, and many companies are doing this. nakalagay naman sa wordings ng ads na separated or "no longer connected" itong employee at hindi na sya authorize mag-transact ng business in behalf of the company. Proteksyon lang ito ng company para sa mga existing at prospective client nila. Quote Link to comment
VentureMaker Posted October 22, 2008 Share Posted October 22, 2008 Thanks for the advise! Thanks for the advise! Quote Link to comment
vagabond Posted October 22, 2008 Share Posted October 22, 2008 You can find the SC issuance here. Some first level courts were designated as special courts to handle small claims. Small claims cover money claims amounting to Ps. 100,000 below, excluding interest and costs. Lawyers do not participate and litigants use standard forms available in courts. I haven't read the entire issuance yet, but offhand, I see that this will be good news for credit card companies (as it will lower their collection costs) and bad news for those with credit card debts below Ps. 100,000 (since with the lower costs, hailing them to court now seems a viable option.)muchas gracias! Quote Link to comment
poprox Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 Good morning po! Malaking tulong po ang thread na ito. Meron po bang immigration lawyer dito.Magpapatulong lang po ako. My mom worked in the states. TNT siya dun ng ilang taon. Nadivorce niya yung tatay ko. Tapos nagasawa siya ng citizen. Namatay yung asawa niya bago niya maiayos ang papers niya. Sabi ng insurance officer hindi niya maikeclaim yung pension ng asawa niya hanggat illegal alien siya dun. After some years umuwi na ang nanay ko dito sa pinas.Pwede po ba na gamitin niyang reason ng pagpunta niya ulit sa states ang pagaayos ng pension ng asawa niya?Natatakot kasi siya magapply ng tourist visa kasi dati siyang TNT. Sana po may makatulong.Maraming salamat po. Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 No harm in trying. Kung di naman siya mag-aapply for a visa, di siya makakabalik sa US. Nothing to lose, ika nga. Good morning po! Malaking tulong po ang thread na ito. Meron po bang immigration lawyer dito.Magpapatulong lang po ako. My mom worked in the states. TNT siya dun ng ilang taon. Nadivorce niya yung tatay ko. Tapos nagasawa siya ng citizen. Namatay yung asawa niya bago niya maiayos ang papers niya. Sabi ng insurance officer hindi niya maikeclaim yung pension ng asawa niya hanggat illegal alien siya dun. After some years umuwi na ang nanay ko dito sa pinas.Pwede po ba na gamitin niyang reason ng pagpunta niya ulit sa states ang pagaayos ng pension ng asawa niya?Natatakot kasi siya magapply ng tourist visa kasi dati siyang TNT. Sana po may makatulong.Maraming salamat po. Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 Note however that Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides in part that the following are ineligibler to receive visas and ineligible for admission in the US: ( ALIENS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT.- (i) In general.-Any alien (other than an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence) who- (I) was unlawfully present in the United States for a period of more than 180 days but less than 1 year, voluntarily departed the United States (whether or not pursuant to section 244(e)) prior to the commencement of proceedings under section 235((1) or section 240, and again seeks admission within 3 years of the date of such alien's departure or removal, or (II) has been unlawfully present in the United States for one year or more, and who again seeks admission within 10 years of the date of such alien's departure or removal from the United States,is inadmissible. No harm in trying. Kung di naman siya mag-aapply for a visa, di siya makakabalik sa US. Nothing to lose, ika nga. Quote Link to comment
poprox Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 Maraming salamat po. Wala bang weight yung pagpapakasal niya sa isang citizen.Baka kako isang malaking plus yun para makabalik siya. Quote Link to comment
wizard23 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 in behalf of a friend, would like to seek legal advise if it is legal to publish a book with compilations of articles, sayings, quotes culled from the internet? will my friend be sued for copyright/plagiarism? information that will be culled from the net are free anyway. tnx for the advice. Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Posibleng i-waive ng Attorney General ang time limit, as follows: Waiver.-The Attorney General has sole discretion to waive clause (i) in the case of an immigrant who is the spouse or son or daughter of a United States citizen or of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, if it is established to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that the refusal of admission to such immigrant alien would result in extreme hardship to the citizen or lawfully resident spouse or parent of such alien. No court shall have jurisdiction to review a decision or action by the Attorney General regarding a waiver under this clause. Ang problema mo, di naman immigrant spouse ang nanay mo. tsaka, paano siya makaka-claim ng extreme hardship para sa asawa niya, eh patay na ito. Anyway, I suggest you consult an American immigration lawyer on your mother's case, baka sakaling me alam silang paraan. Maraming salamat po. Wala bang weight yung pagpapakasal niya sa isang citizen.Baka kako isang malaking plus yun para makabalik siya. Quote Link to comment
mjdec_11 Posted October 28, 2008 Share Posted October 28, 2008 i need help here regarding the format and how to execute an affidavit of 2 disinterested persons as required by SSS for the claim of my father-in-laws (deceased) benefits. here's a summary of facts, my father-in-law (deceased) died sept of 2007, so a yr ago, him already a widower at that time since my mom-in-law passed away 7 years ago. Accdg to SSS, if claimant's wife is alive, she is the legal heir to claim, but since the wife is already dead, next to claim can be the parents of my father-in-law, which again, are already dead likewise. So the children, who is my wife and his bro are the one's claiming it, but SSS requires such affidavit. Does anyone here have a format of such? 2nd, does the 2 disinterested person whom shall sign in the affidavit need to be as old as the grandparents of my wife? kelangan ba kilala nila personally yung grandparents? coz SSS wants also the death cert and marriage cert of the grandparents, NSO doesnt have records because of such, thus we cant provide any docs to SSS. Quote Link to comment
pol22366 Posted October 28, 2008 Share Posted October 28, 2008 in behalf of a friend, would like to seek legal advise if it is legal to publish a book with compilations of articles, sayings, quotes culled from the internet? will my friend be sued for copyright/plagiarism? information that will be culled from the net are free anyway. tnx for the advice. Basically you just have to metion who are the authors of these articles, sayings, quotes. And he must mention that the book is a mere compilation of what he obtained from the internet for free for him not to be liable for plagiarism. Copyright however is another matter, this would entail asking permission from the authors or owners of the copyright if you can publish them in your friend's book... while he obtained them from the net for free, it doesn't mean that he can copy it and make money out of it. Remember that copyright laws are internationally enforceable, so that even if the author or owner is not from your country or state, his/her copyrights over his/her works must be respected. Quote Link to comment
darkpalosx Posted October 28, 2008 Share Posted October 28, 2008 sir sa networking ba me mahahabol,like pinangako na sila magdispose ng products ko para lang mamemeber ako,tapos ending e wala pala tapos inaaway pa ako ngayon Quote Link to comment
MODERATOR bonito99 Posted October 28, 2008 MODERATOR Share Posted October 28, 2008 estafa and other deceits. unjust vexation Quote Link to comment
bokjsp Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 Is it legal to publish the name and picture of a separated employee stating that she is no longer connected with the company? Many people assume the person was terminated for a crime! ok lang only if you limit your notice that the person is no longer connected to your company but the moment you add some info that might cast aspersion to her reputation, yari ka because that may be libelous. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.