legal Free Legal Advice

[azayco]

^^

 

Sorry, I stand corrected. It's 1.5% of fair market value DST for sale of land.

[yolak69]

I need help badly, my wife filed a case against me, badtrip ako na niloko ako pa may kaso...

 

Tibay ng law na to, come to think of it, unfair na talaga sa mga lalake ngayon ang batas, na aabuso na tong batas na to, pati mga kabit pwde mag file ng case sa lalake, importante lang kasi maestablish mo na may relationship kayo. Tibay!!![/size]

Edited August 8, 2008 by yolak69

[lomex32]

My friend

 

1. Get a lawyer ... a good one.....

 

2. ..... RA 9262 is a super pain in the ass

This will ROB you of your happiness, money and put s@%t on your head ....

 

3. Abuse is defined in 8 sections of this RA

Physical, Emotional, Financial etc...

 

Can you give a background of why your wife file this?

[yolak69]

My friend

 

1. Get a lawyer ... a good one.....

 

2. ..... RA 9262 is a super pain in the ass

This will ROB you of your happiness, money and put s@%t on your head ....

 

3. Abuse is defined in 8 sections of this RA

Physical, Emotional, Financial etc...

 

Can you give a background of why your wife file this?

 

 

Well, all i can say is that she really got this good lawyer mala Katrina Legarda, i caught my wife one day sa kwarto pa namin with a guy, ayun nabugbog ko sila pareho. I can't file adultery coz techically you have to catch them doing 'the act'.

 

ayun, nagfile ng medico legal, may mga pasa ung asawa ko. dun na nagsimula lahat. ako na ginago ako pa may kaso. para malinis ung pangalan nya sa pamilya nya, hinalungkat nya yan RA 9262. Namputs* battered husband ako pero tiniis ko lahat, ngayon ako pa ganito. di ko pa makita ng maayos anak ko.

 

Thanks really for checking...

[mlpf]

What were they doing when you caught them? Adultery can be proven by circumstantial evidence. It is difficult, but it can be done. You have to file an adultery case to bolster your defense. While you are at it, ask your lawyer to challenge the constitutionality of RA 9262 for being violative of the equal protection clause. It is high time that someone challenges the validity of that unfair law.

[yolak69]

What were they doing when you caught them? Adultery can be proven by circumstantial evidence. It is difficult, but it can be done. You have to file an adultery case to bolster your defense. While you are at it, ask your lawyer to challenge the constitutionality of RA 9262 for being violative of the equal protection clause. It is high time that someone challenges the validity of that unfair law.

 

 

mga 2mins ko pa bago nabuksan pinto, sa sobrang sipa ko na hanggang magiba, so wala na tlga ko nakita. i don't have lawyer yet, la pa ko pera, umasa ako sa PAO nung nag file ako ng counter-affidavit, ayun super weak ung defense ko. Pero ok lang, kasalanan ko din naman, akala ko kasi iaatras ng asawa ko, sabay pa nga kami mag-attend ng hearing sa fiscal eh, tapos biglang one day sabi nya itutuloy nya..ang gulo!!!!

 

salamat!!!

[Arneeious]

The other day I went to LBC to have a letter delivered overnight to a client. I had already closed and sealed the envelope before going to LBC. The attendant told me that I had to open the envelope so he could inspect the letter I was sending. When I asked why, he couldn't give me a straight answer. The best he could do was say "Sir, syempre, kung kayo di ba gugustuhin nyo rin malaman kung ano ung pinapadala sainyo?"

 

I had no choice but to open the letter since it was obvious he wouldn't accept the letter for mailing unless I complied. Anyway, it was just an ordinary letter. My question is, is it legal for courier companies to do this? Isn't this a violation of my privacy or confidentiality of private documents?

[rocco69]

The other day I went to LBC to have a letter delivered overnight to a client. I had already closed and sealed the envelope before going to LBC. The attendant told me that I had to open the envelope so he could inspect the letter I was sending. When I asked why, he couldn't give me a straight answer. The best he could do was say "Sir, syempre, kung kayo di ba gugustuhin nyo rin malaman kung ano ung pinapadala sainyo?"

 

I had no choice but to open the letter since it was obvious he wouldn't accept the letter for mailing unless I complied. Anyway, it was just an ordinary letter. My question is, is it legal for courier companies to do this? Isn't this a violation of my privacy or confidentiality of private documents?

 

Tutoong may karapatan ang bawat mamamayan sa privacy of communication at correspondence. Kailangan may court order para buksan ang mga liham na ating pinapadala o tinatanggap para makita kung ano ang mga nilalaman nito. Kaya lang, ayun sa People v. Marti [193 SCRA 57] (kung saan binuksan ng freight forwarder ang package ng walang pahintulot at kaalaman ng nagpadala, at marijuana at hasish pala ang laman), ang karapatan na ito ay hindi pumipigil sa pulis o mga otoridad para gamitin ito bilang ebidensya, kung ang nagbukas naman ay hindi pulis.

 

Higit pa rito, sinabi rin sa kasong ito na ang pag-iinspeksyon ng may-ari ng forwarding company (o sa kaso mo, ng empleyado ng LBC) ng mga package na pinapadala ay "reasonable and standard operating procedure on the part of [the forwarding company] as a precautionary measure before delivery of packages to the Bureau of Customs or the Bureau of Posts." Lumalabas na pwede talaga nilang tingnan kung ano yung pinapadala mo. Pero ito naman ay limitado lamang sa pagtingin kung ano ang pinapadala mo, ibang usapan na kung pati kung ano ang isinulat mo sa liham ay gusto pa rin nilang makita.

 

Isa pa, ang right to privacy of communication and correspondence ay maaaring i-waive. Kung papayag ka na pabuksan ang liham, walang paglabag sa karapatan mo, pumayag ka eh. Hindi ka naman pinipilit ng LBC na magpadala sa kanila. Kung ayaw mo sa kanilang patakaran na titingnan nila muna ang pinapadala mo, pwede kang humanap ng ibang courier service o forwarder na magdadala ng sulat mo.

[Guest pukemoon]

^^

 

Are you referring to the right of privacy of communication and correspondence under the Constitution?

[legalavatar]

The other day I went to LBC to have a letter delivered overnight to a client. I had already closed and sealed the envelope before going to LBC. The attendant told me that I had to open the envelope so he could inspect the letter I was sending. When I asked why, he couldn't give me a straight answer. The best he could do was say "Sir, syempre, kung kayo di ba gugustuhin nyo rin malaman kung ano ung pinapadala sainyo?"

 

I had no choice but to open the letter since it was obvious he wouldn't accept the letter for mailing unless I complied. Anyway, it was just an ordinary letter. My question is, is it legal for courier companies to do this? Isn't this a violation of my privacy or confidentiality of private documents?

 

Dude that's perfectly legal in my opinion. The Bill of Rights applies, to a large extent, only against the government. It does not apply to private courier companies.

 

The solution to your problem is quite simple. Find another courier company which will not open your mail matter before sending.

 

It's really no different than subjecting yourself to a security check before entering a mall. If you refuse, then by all means go find another mall to visit.

 

So if you allow the courier company to open your mail as a prerequisite to availing of their courier service, then you have in effect waived your right to privacy of communication. If you refuse and decide not to use their services, but they still pursue opening your envelope, only then will they be liable for a violation of your rights.

 

Hope this was enlightening.

[Guest pukemoon]

^^

 

How about liability for damages under the Civil Code?

[jopoc]

Well, all i can say is that she really got this good lawyer mala Katrina Legarda, i caught my wife one day sa kwarto pa namin with a guy, ayun nabugbog ko sila pareho. I can't file adultery coz techically you have to catch them doing 'the act'.

 

ayun, nagfile ng medico legal, may mga pasa ung asawa ko. dun na nagsimula lahat. ako na ginago ako pa may kaso. para malinis ung pangalan nya sa pamilya nya, hinalungkat nya yan RA 9262. Namputs* battered husband ako pero tiniis ko lahat, ngayon ako pa ganito. di ko pa makita ng maayos anak ko.

 

Thanks really for checking...

 

 

what you should have done is come up with a sworn statement that you saw them IN THE ACT already.

how can they prove that you are lying? the evidence is clear. magkasama sila sa kama.

[joey_d29]

What are the consequence of having an affair with a barely legal girl? she hid her real age.

[azayco]

The consequences will depend on her age. How young is "barely legal"? I hope not less than 12 years, Mr. Jalosjos.

[lakandiwa]

Brother:

 

Pag "barely legal," that would mean na kaka-legal lang (i.e. kaka-eighteen lang). Walang consequences dun. Below 18 (kahit 17 years, 11 months and 29 days), not legal yun. Although for practical purposes, wala nang kwento to kasi most girls sixteen pa lang, nakuha na (iba nga younger). Ingat lang, of course.

 

The consequences will depend on her age. How young is "barely legal"? I hope not less than 12 years, Mr. Jalosjos.