legal Free Legal Advice

[Guest djunya2006]

Hello, I would just like to get advice from you about the troubling pm I recieved yesterday. This started when I assisted the owner of Pier 39 in posting responses to former disgruntled employees. Now it seems this person has changed his sn from ,jason2002 and stonecold to at present textmate. I have chosen to stop interacting with this person but I recieved a troubling pm recenty, which I am attaching.

 

TEXTMATE Peace Settlement?, Yesterday, 11:28 PM

 

 

Voyeur

 

 

Group: Lurkers

Posts: 0

Member No.: 120,537

Joined: Yesterday, 11:00 PM

 

 

 

TANG INA MO! PATAYIN NA KITA! Bakit ako haharap dyan? When I have the LORD with me. Im not afraid, youre f#&king owner Pinky is the god-damn s@%t coward for treating people with less money than you, like s@%t. You know what, to prove im not full of s@%t, Im here waiting my number is 09059720500. Let's face it you dont know who you're dealing with. ITs a shame that your MANIPULATE EVERYTHING your employees, your retarded parents and children, even POSTERS HERE who believe the truth say. Dapat sa iyo PATAYIN na para hindi ka na manloko pa. Magpaalam ka na sa asawa't anak mo, duwag! I gave my number because im serious, I dont want to be f#&ked with. Talk to me and I promise that you will hear GOD's voice. HEY, PINKY AND YOU MANIPULATIVE SON OF A BITCH! Time for you to die. Im waiting. PERO, I bet magugulat ka, kasi hindi mo siguro alam kung sino ako. Yeah, you'd be surprised! Patayin na kita? Patayin na kita? Im gonna god-damn burn PIER31, after my hunney leaves, kilala kita djunya kilala kita Pinky. Ill make sure nandun kayo sa loob. Patayin na kita! Patayin na kita!

 

 

I would like to know how I can deal with this legally, because I think this should fall under grave threats. How do I go about pressing charges against this person? Thank you and I will wait for your response. To see our exchanges between myself and this person please go to the KTV section and Pier 39.

[charmed shannen]

Since no one seems to be tackling this, what exactly are your points for discussion? For the levied properties, you state that they were never sequestered. Thus, there is no conflict if the said properties were levied by the BIR. On the question of the estate tax, you shouldn't be surprised if the basis for the BIR computation would be all the identifiable properties of the late Mr. Marcos. Claims against the estate must be filed by the claimants, and the BIR will never identify nor provide for it when they compute the estate tax. I still fail to see what kind of discussion you are trying to elicit.

 

 

 

Good morning Dr. pepper.. thanks for your reply.

 

The proponent suggested that these forfeited Marcos properties be sold back to the Marcoses so that BIR can generate billions of revenue from the transaction. Is that possible? It was of judicial notice that there was no interested bidder when they were auctioned off. She termed it as "the goose that lay the golden egg."

 

The conflict, as I understand it, is that all properties of the Marcoses are claimed to be "ill-gotten" by the PCGG so they were part of the sequestered lot, but as these Tacloban properties are ancestral properties, they should not be part of the sequestration. The proponent now questions the propriety of the sequestration power of the PCGG over the levy power of the BIR.

[Screwtape]

Have another Q:

Have you guys tried renaming the AVESQ.DAT files from a VCD to

Ex. "File.Mpg" ? I hav eben doing this always and it works.

Is it really ok to do this? I guess it converts the DAT file to standard MPEG.

Or do I need to use a converter?

 

Renaming the file extension doesnt change the file format. You still need to convert it. The only reason it appears to work and you can still play the file is because your player has multiple MIME type associations.

[rickyv]

would you mind rephrasing your question in the english language?

 

if you are filing a case in America, the governing law in the state where you intend to commence a suit will apply, not the Philippine procedural rules. Hence, whether or not you could initiate an action through a representative is best addressed to the American lawyers practising in America. Your question therefore, should be couched in the American language to enable an American bar member to make an intelligent reply.

 

 

sorry,

ok, here's what I meant: Since I'm living here in the Philippines, Could I appoint someone; a friend or relative or even the american lawyer himself to represent me in order to file against the person who swindled me, whom is already an american citizen?

[Kurtsky Keigee]

Hehe tagal i convert eh

At least gumagana

[Dr_PepPeR]

Good morning Dr. pepper.. thanks for your reply.

 

The proponent suggested that these forfeited Marcos properties be sold back to the Marcoses so that BIR can generate billions of revenue from the transaction. Is that possible? It was of judicial notice that there was no interested bidder when they were auctioned off. She termed it as "the goose that lay the golden egg."

 

The conflict, as I understand it, is that all properties of the Marcoses are claimed to be "ill-gotten" by the PCGG so they were part of the sequestered lot, but as these Tacloban properties are ancestral properties, they should not be part of the sequestration. The proponent now questions the propriety of the sequestration power of the PCGG over the levy power of the BIR.

 

Pardon my ignorance but I assumed that the Tacloban properties were never sequestered by the PCGG. I remember the heady days when the PCGG was issuing sequestration orders right and left but if at this time they were left alone by the PCGG, then they would have a very weak case of going after the said properties or the proceeds of the sale of these properties.

 

In any case, I feel that the proceeds from the BIR levy, if ever the sale is realized, should properly go to the BIR and thus indirectly goes to the national government. The Marcoses could have bought it back from the auction sale, if they so desired. But I guess what you mean is do a negotiated sale back to the Marcoses. But maybe I digress. I submit that the levy power of the BIR takes precedence over the sequestration power of the PCGG IF A CONFLICT EXISTS. From what I read, there is no conflict at all with respect to the Tacloban properties. I think...

[rapturousone]

sorry,

ok, here's what I meant: Since I'm living here in the Philippines, Could I appoint someone; a friend or relative or even the american lawyer himself to represent me in order to file against the person who swindled me, whom is already an american citizen?

 

That would depend on the procedural law of the state where you will file the suit. First, you need to determine if you have the standing (i.e., whether under the laws of that state you have the right to file the suit). Second, you need to determine if under the laws of that state the suit can be filed and/or prosecuted in your absence.

[jopoc]

sorry,

ok, here's what I meant: Since I'm living here in the Philippines, Could I appoint someone; a friend or relative or even the american lawyer himself to represent me in order to file against the person who swindled me, whom is already an american citizen?

 

 

saan ka ba niloko?

[WayKurat]

try to downlod k-light codec pack

 

 

I downloaded the codec pack but i still can't open the file. any other suggestions?

 

Smoking Aces.DTS.NTSC.DVDR-XPDVD.avi this is the file I want to open. what program do I have to download to open the said file?

[rickyv]

salamat po, thank you.

[charmed shannen]

thank you Dr. Pepper. At least, i have another insight on the matter. Pag pina discuss sa akin ng boss ko ito, may masasabi ako. kaso lang, sana hindi ikaw ang boss ko

[fauxhead]

I disagree. If there is a conflict between a sequestration order and a BIR levy, the sequestration order should prevail.

 

Won't you agree that the BIR levy would be invalid and ineffective should these properties be deemed ill-gotten? Why should the government settle for just a slice when it can take the whole goddamned cake? If they are deemed ill-gotten, then they are not supposed to be part of the estate. Thus, until the issue of sequestration be ventilated and clarified in the proper judicial forum, the BIR's claim should be suspended. In effect, the BIR can make a reassessment of the estate tax should the courts decide that the property is not ill-gotten.

 

 

 

Pardon my ignorance but I assumed that the Tacloban properties were never sequestered by the PCGG. I remember the heady days when the PCGG was issuing sequestration orders right and left but if at this time they were left alone by the PCGG, then they would have a very weak case of going after the said properties or the proceeds of the sale of these properties.

 

In any case, I feel that the proceeds from the BIR levy, if ever the sale is realized, should properly go to the BIR and thus indirectly goes to the national government. The Marcoses could have bought it back from the auction sale, if they so desired. But I guess what you mean is do a negotiated sale back to the Marcoses. But maybe I digress. I submit that the levy power of the BIR takes precedence over the sequestration power of the PCGG IF A CONFLICT EXISTS. From what I read, there is no conflict at all with respect to the Tacloban properties. I think...

[WayKurat]

anybody? please with opening these files.

[Kurtsky Keigee]

I downloaded the codec pack but i still can't open the file. any other suggestions?

 

Smoking Aces.DTS.NTSC.DVDR-XPDVD.avi this is the file I want to open. what program do I have to download to open the said file?

 

Hmmmm.. try VLC media player its free

search sa google

[kupsi]

yung sakin galing lang dito sa MTC.

 

nung una ayaw din tumakbo. and me missing files daw.

 

kinalikot ko lang ng paulit-ulit, ayun, tumakbo na.

 

not sure what caused/cured the problem.