aNtipAtiKa Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 (edited) i need a lawyer who is an expert with civil service cases. asap. somebody here help me please. Edited January 10, 2011 by aNtipAtiKa Quote Link to comment
TracerOne Posted January 11, 2011 Share Posted January 11, 2011 My mom's in need of a lawyer, she has a hearing set on Jan. 31 and we still have no lawyer. We approached some lawyers even my Tito who's a lawyer to help us for our "Petition for Preliminary Investigation" but all of them are asking for a P50K or P25k acceptance fee and every hearing we will pay 4k. As much as we wanted to have a lawyer we can't afford the expensive fee. Please help us find a good lawyer who's not that expensive. We're thinking of having PAO instead but we doubt if they can help us at all. Thanks. Quote Link to comment
jazon7099 Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 San locatio ng case?anong specific case? The pao can certainly help unless u are not a pauper San locatio ng case?anong specific case? The pao can certainly help unless u are not a pauper Quote Link to comment
Lanceagosto Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 Thanks to Sir Rocco for his legal advice on my PM. Quote Link to comment
HardOn Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 Kailangan malaman muna ano nangyari sa kaso nong dinemanda sya ng 2006. Yang ba binabangit na 2009 na utang na 300K pano nadetermine yan amount na yan, sa decision ba ng korte o may compromise agreement? Ano ang nakalagay sa kaayusan nila, malamang kasi hinde naman papayag banko sa verbal agreement lang. Sir Redax, Walang nangyari sa kaso since 2006. Hindi rin sya umattend ng mga hearings. Yun daw 300K eh yung amount na sinisingil sa kanya ngayon. Hindi raw desisyon ng korte yun. Ayun ata yung kabuuang kasama tubo. Quote Link to comment
Dr_PepPeR Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 mga sirs, legal advice naman po. I am a manager for a local bank. naprapraning lang po ako. Several years back when I was still a branch supervisor, we require documents to be microfilmed by tellers for backup. Now, several years after, the bank cannot locate those documents and they need it for a court case because the client is denying taking money out from his account. Can I be held liable to pay for the client's claims? We are only required to forward the microfilm for developing and rerun documents that were not fully captured. The thing is, nung nalaman ko na kelangan ireun ulit yung mga docs, pinadala na ng bangko sa client yung mga ito (checks) TIA! Can you be more explicit? If you are talking about cancelled or returned checks for DAUD or DAIF or closed accounts, these are normally returned to the client. However the bank is required to keep records for five years. Now if you followed your bank's policies regarding documentation of account documents, then you don't have to worry as the legal case is the Bank's problem, not yours. What is important for you is that you followed operational procedures. Quote Link to comment
redax Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Sir Redax, Walang nangyari sa kaso since 2006. Hindi rin sya umattend ng mga hearings. Yun daw 300K eh yung amount na sinisingil sa kanya ngayon. Hindi raw desisyon ng korte yun. Ayun ata yung kabuuang kasama tubo.Kailangan medyo mas specific kaysa sa walang nangyari ang sagot. Nadismiss ba o baka kasi ongoing at leverage ng banko yan. Baka kasi nadeclare sya in default at may judgment na. Pag may judgment kasi at naging final yang execution nyan puede ilevy lahat ng ariarian nya na hinde exempt from execution. Kung may ariarian sya, delikado sya. Yung sa renegotiation naman ng amount due, kung ako ang banko magdududa na ako sa renegotiation dahil 2009 lang nagkasundo, di na naman nasusunod ng debtor. Kung baga, very recent lang ang agreement, di na nasunod, medyo may duda na sa credibility o good faith ng debtor. Quote Link to comment
Kazekage.Gaara Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 For example, you applied for a Quality Analyst position. You go through the 3 month probationary period, but do not pass. They should put you back in Operations since 1 1/2 years ka na sa company, but dahil daw walang account na paglalagyan sa iyo (due to your profile "not qualified" for whatever account who's lacking personnel) they end your employment sa company. What they have you sign is a non-confirmation for the qa position, with no mention of the attempt for locating an account for you. Does that warrant a separation pay??? Quote Link to comment
iceman8 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 hi everyone, i have a question regarding employment. i'm a business owner of an IT firm right now, and I have employees that work for me. I have a problem with employees. Usually, these employees are not regular employees. They're still under probationary status. After a few days or a few months or working for me, they suddenly disappear. It's so frustrating on my end since I invested time and money in training them and suddenly they go AWOL. I was wondering what I can do legally in case this happens. Can I sue them or ask them to pay me an amount or something? I just feel that it's unfair that employees can just go AWOL and leave their employers hanging. It's so unprofessional and unfair. Please advise. Thank you very much! Quote Link to comment
Dr_PepPeR Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 For example, you applied for a Quality Analyst position. You go through the 3 month probationary period, but do not pass. They should put you back in Operations since 1 1/2 years ka na sa company, but dahil daw walang account na paglalagyan sa iyo (due to your profile "not qualified" for whatever account who's lacking personnel) they end your employment sa company. What they have you sign is a non-confirmation for the qa position, with no mention of the attempt for locating an account for you. Does that warrant a separation pay??? If you are a regular employee, you can only be terminated for cause. Did you sign a contract when you applied? hi everyone, i have a question regarding employment. i'm a business owner of an IT firm right now, and I have employees that work for me. I have a problem with employees. Usually, these employees are not regular employees. They're still under probationary status. After a few days or a few months or working for me, they suddenly disappear. It's so frustrating on my end since I invested time and money in training them and suddenly they go AWOL. I was wondering what I can do legally in case this happens. Can I sue them or ask them to pay me an amount or something? I just feel that it's unfair that employees can just go AWOL and leave their employers hanging. It's so unprofessional and unfair. Please advise. Thank you very much! If you really train them, you might want to sign them to a training contract that has a penalty if they leave prematurely. But you should know that probies have really no incentive to stay if there's nothing in it for them. Quote Link to comment
Kazekage.Gaara Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 If you are a regular employee, you can only be terminated for cause. Did you sign a contract when you applied? I did. And I am a regular employee too, having stayed with the company for 1 year and 4 months. Quote Link to comment
Dr_PepPeR Posted January 24, 2011 Share Posted January 24, 2011 I did. And I am a regular employee too, having stayed with the company for 1 year and 4 months. If you signed a contract when you applied for the Quality Analyst position, you might want to check it again to see what is the company policy if you do not pass. If there is no provision regarding separation, then they cannot just let you go as they have to comply with due process first. Normally, separation from service has no corresponding separation pay, unless it is involuntary, like redundancy, retrenchment, retirement, sickness or death etc. Quote Link to comment
iceman8 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 If you are a regular employee, you can only be terminated for cause. Did you sign a contract when you applied? If you really train them, you might want to sign them to a training contract that has a penalty if they leave prematurely. But you should know that probies have really no incentive to stay if there's nothing in it for them. yeah, but the problem is, they just change address and you wouldn't even know how to find them anymore. For probies, is there a law or something where in I can sue them to leaving the company prematurely (sudden LOA)? Quote Link to comment
Lanceagosto Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 Mga sir, Ask ko lang, ano ang ibig sabihin ng John Doe sa contract? Quote Link to comment
mardigras Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 a John Doe is someone whose true identity is unknown or must be withheld. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.