legal Free Legal Advice

[HardOn]

Mahirap na yan dahil nadismiss na nga sa first hearing ang application for extension. Usually nag aapply renewal bago mag expire CPC. Yang guarantee sa yo ng maglalakad wala kang makuha jan pag hinde naextend. Ikaw lahat gamble jan pag hinde naextend at yang taxi na bilhin mo magiging private car na maraming kilometro na nabiyahe. Tagilid ka sa usapan na yan. Saka malabo yang sinasabi na nadismiss dahil kulang sa document na nagveverify previous owners, ibig sabihin yan, hinde pa naapprove yung sale and transfer ng CPC sa seller dahil vineverify pa ang previous owners.

 

Thanks sor moed. sana masagot mo rin yung isa ko pang question about dun sa problem ng office mate ko. Thanks again

[redax]

Lapit ko lang din yung legal problem ng office mate ko.

 

Naka-loan kasi sya sa PSBank last March 2004 under Flexi Credit Line ng 50K nA merong revolving credit line agreement.. He already made several payments. Actually malaki na rin ang naihuhulog nya hanggang sa natigil ang pagbabayad nya kasi nagkaproblem sya financially. Then dinemanda sya ng bank last june 2006 ng civil case for sum of money. Hindi nya pinansin yung demanda kasi wala rin naman syang pambayad dito. Until 2009, umabot na ang utang nya sa 300K. That time, nakipagayos na sya. Nagbigay sya ng 30K last Jan 2009 with verbal agreement na huhulog hulugan nya. Pero hindi rin sya naka-comply. Gusto nya sanang ayusin. Pinatatanong nya kung:

1. Since gipit pa rin sya financially ngayon, pwede ba na makiusap sya sa bangko na since nagbigay na sya ng 30K last year at marami na syang naibayad before, baka pwedeng hindi na sya magbayad considering na 50K lang naman ang amount ng utang nya (sobra sobra na dito ang total ng naibayad nya.

2. Nung Novermber 2009, pinadalhan sya ng letter ng abogado ng bank ng demand letter na may banta na kakasuhan sya ng kriminal for estafa or culpable insolvency dahil sya daw ay nagtatago na. Maaari ba talaga syang sapahan ng criminal case gayong utang lang naman yun?

 

Maraming salamat sa mga magbibigay pansin sa tanong na ito.

 

Kailangan malaman muna ano nangyari sa kaso nong dinemanda sya ng 2006. Yang ba binabangit na 2009 na utang na 300K pano nadetermine yan amount na yan, sa decision ba ng korte o may compromise agreement? Ano ang nakalagay sa kaayusan nila, malamang kasi hinde naman papayag banko sa verbal agreement lang.

[2hot4yah]

good PM po..

 

i need advice po regarding sa daughter ko.. me and her dad are not married, pero she carries the surname of her dad. pero ngayon hiwalay na kami. yung dad nya nagtatago, and doesnt want to give sustento to our daughter. my daughter is 1year old.

 

Q#1 : is there a legal way para maobliga sya na magbigay ng sustento for our kid?

Q#2 : or pwede po ba sya maalisan ng karapatan sa bata kasi tinakbuhan nya naman responsibilidad nya?

Q#3 : totoo rin po ba na pag napatunayan nila na may iba na akong boyfriend e pwede nila kunin yung custody nung bata saakin?

 

thanks in advance po.

[rocco69]

Q#1 : is there a legal way para maobliga sya na magbigay ng sustento for our kid?

 

kasuhan mo ng child abuse (see Sec. 10a in relation to Sec. 3b[3], Republic Act 7610) at violation ng Sec.5e ng Republic Act 9262. tingnan mo at makikiusap yan pag nakasuhan na.

 

 

Q#2 : or pwede po ba sya maalisan ng karapatan sa bata kasi tinakbuhan nya naman responsibilidad nya?

 

pwede, abandonment ito, isa sa mga ground para tanggalin ng parental authority ang isamg magulang

 

 

Q#3 : totoo rin po ba na pag napatunayan nila na may iba na akong boyfriend e pwede nila kunin yung custody nung bata saakin?

 

dahil hindi naman kayo kasal, ang bata ay illegitimate. kapag illegitimate ang bata, ito ay nasa ilalim ng authority ng nanay. ang karapatan lang ng ama ay visitation rights. in short, hindi nila makukuha ang custody ng bata mula sa iyo (unless maipapakita nila na makakasama sa bata ang patuloy na pagtira nito sa poder ng nanay). dahil di naman kayo kasal, may karapatan kang makipag-relasyon sa iba, kung kaya't hindi ito magagamit na dahilan upang kunin ang bata mula sa iyo.

 

good PM po..

 

i need advice po regarding sa daughter ko.. me and her dad are not married, pero she carries the surname of her dad. pero ngayon hiwalay na kami. yung dad nya nagtatago, and doesnt want to give sustento to our daughter. my daughter is 1year old.

 

Q#1 : is there a legal way para maobliga sya na magbigay ng sustento for our kid?

Q#2 : or pwede po ba sya maalisan ng karapatan sa bata kasi tinakbuhan nya naman responsibilidad nya?

Q#3 : totoo rin po ba na pag napatunayan nila na may iba na akong boyfriend e pwede nila kunin yung custody nung bata saakin?

 

thanks in advance po.

[2hot4yah]

Q#1 : is there a legal way para maobliga sya na magbigay ng sustento for our kid?

 

kasuhan mo ng child abuse (see Sec. 10a in relation to Sec. 3b[3], Republic Act 7610) at violation ng Sec.5e ng Republic Act 9262. tingnan mo at makikiusap yan pag nakasuhan na.

 

 

Q#2 : or pwede po ba sya maalisan ng karapatan sa bata kasi tinakbuhan nya naman responsibilidad nya?

 

pwede, abandonment ito, isa sa mga ground para tanggalin ng parental authority ang isamg magulang

 

 

Q#3 : totoo rin po ba na pag napatunayan nila na may iba na akong boyfriend e pwede nila kunin yung custody nung bata saakin?

 

dahil hindi naman kayo kasal, ang bata ay illegitimate. kapag illegitimate ang bata, ito ay nasa ilalim ng authority ng nanay. ang karapatan lang ng ama ay visitation rights. in short, hindi nila makukuha ang custody ng bata mula sa iyo (unless maipapakita nila na makakasama sa bata ang patuloy na pagtira nito sa poder ng nanay). dahil di naman kayo kasal, may karapatan kang makipag-relasyon sa iba, kung kaya't hindi ito magagamit na dahilan upang kunin ang bata mula sa iyo.

 

 

 

thanks po. big help, natanggal na lahat ng tanong sa utak ko.

 

 

 

[aNtipAtiKa]

i need a lawyer who is an expert with civil service cases. asap.

 

somebody here help me please.

Edited January 10, 2011 by aNtipAtiKa

[TracerOne]

My mom's in need of a lawyer, she has a hearing set on Jan. 31 and we still have no lawyer. We approached some lawyers even my Tito who's a lawyer to help us for our "Petition for Preliminary Investigation" but all of them are asking for a P50K or P25k acceptance fee and every hearing we will pay 4k. As much as we wanted to have a lawyer we can't afford the expensive fee. Please help us find a good lawyer who's not that expensive. We're thinking of having PAO instead but we doubt if they can help us at all. Thanks.

[jazon7099]

San locatio ng case?anong specific case? The pao can certainly help unless u are not a pauper

 

San locatio ng case?anong specific case? The pao can certainly help unless u are not a pauper

[Lanceagosto]

Thanks to Sir Rocco for his legal advice on my PM.

[HardOn]

Kailangan malaman muna ano nangyari sa kaso nong dinemanda sya ng 2006. Yang ba binabangit na 2009 na utang na 300K pano nadetermine yan amount na yan, sa decision ba ng korte o may compromise agreement? Ano ang nakalagay sa kaayusan nila, malamang kasi hinde naman papayag banko sa verbal agreement lang.

 

Sir Redax,

 

Walang nangyari sa kaso since 2006. Hindi rin sya umattend ng mga hearings. Yun daw 300K eh yung amount na sinisingil sa kanya ngayon. Hindi raw desisyon ng korte yun. Ayun ata yung kabuuang kasama tubo.

[Dr_PepPeR]

mga sirs,

 

legal advice naman po. I am a manager for a local bank. naprapraning lang po ako. Several years back when I was still a branch supervisor, we require documents to be microfilmed by tellers for backup. Now, several years after, the bank cannot locate those documents and they need it for a court case because the client is denying taking money out from his account. Can I be held liable to pay for the client's claims? We are only required to forward the microfilm for developing and rerun documents that were not fully captured. The thing is, nung nalaman ko na kelangan ireun ulit yung mga docs, pinadala na ng bangko sa client yung mga ito (checks)

 

TIA!

 

Can you be more explicit? If you are talking about cancelled or returned checks for DAUD or DAIF or closed accounts, these are normally returned to the client. However the bank is required to keep records for five years. Now if you followed your bank's policies regarding documentation of account documents, then you don't have to worry as the legal case is the Bank's problem, not yours. What is important for you is that you followed operational procedures.

[redax]

Sir Redax,

 

Walang nangyari sa kaso since 2006. Hindi rin sya umattend ng mga hearings. Yun daw 300K eh yung amount na sinisingil sa kanya ngayon. Hindi raw desisyon ng korte yun. Ayun ata yung kabuuang kasama tubo.

Kailangan medyo mas specific kaysa sa walang nangyari ang sagot. Nadismiss ba o baka kasi ongoing at leverage ng banko yan. Baka kasi nadeclare sya in default at may judgment na. Pag may judgment kasi at naging final yang execution nyan puede ilevy lahat ng ariarian nya na hinde exempt from execution. Kung may ariarian sya, delikado sya. Yung sa renegotiation naman ng amount due, kung ako ang banko magdududa na ako sa renegotiation dahil 2009 lang nagkasundo, di na naman nasusunod ng debtor. Kung baga, very recent lang ang agreement, di na nasunod, medyo may duda na sa credibility o good faith ng debtor.

[Kazekage.Gaara]

For example, you applied for a Quality Analyst position. You go through the 3 month probationary period, but do not pass.

 

They should put you back in Operations since 1 1/2 years ka na sa company, but dahil daw walang account na paglalagyan sa iyo (due to your profile "not qualified" for whatever account who's lacking personnel) they end your employment sa company. What they have you sign is a non-confirmation for the qa position, with no mention of the attempt for locating an account for you.

 

Does that warrant a separation pay???

[iceman8]

hi everyone,

 

i have a question regarding employment. i'm a business owner of an IT firm right now, and I have employees that work for me. I have a problem with employees. Usually, these employees are not regular employees. They're still under probationary status. After a few days or a few months or working for me, they suddenly disappear. It's so frustrating on my end since I invested time and money in training them and suddenly they go AWOL. I was wondering what I can do legally in case this happens. Can I sue them or ask them to pay me an amount or something? I just feel that it's unfair that employees can just go AWOL and leave their employers hanging. It's so unprofessional and unfair.

 

Please advise. Thank you very much!

[Dr_PepPeR]

For example, you applied for a Quality Analyst position. You go through the 3 month probationary period, but do not pass.

 

They should put you back in Operations since 1 1/2 years ka na sa company, but dahil daw walang account na paglalagyan sa iyo (due to your profile "not qualified" for whatever account who's lacking personnel) they end your employment sa company. What they have you sign is a non-confirmation for the qa position, with no mention of the attempt for locating an account for you.

 

Does that warrant a separation pay???

 

If you are a regular employee, you can only be terminated for cause. Did you sign a contract when you applied?

 

hi everyone,

 

i have a question regarding employment. i'm a business owner of an IT firm right now, and I have employees that work for me. I have a problem with employees. Usually, these employees are not regular employees. They're still under probationary status. After a few days or a few months or working for me, they suddenly disappear. It's so frustrating on my end since I invested time and money in training them and suddenly they go AWOL. I was wondering what I can do legally in case this happens. Can I sue them or ask them to pay me an amount or something? I just feel that it's unfair that employees can just go AWOL and leave their employers hanging. It's so unprofessional and unfair.

 

Please advise. Thank you very much!

 

If you really train them, you might want to sign them to a training contract that has a penalty if they leave prematurely. But you should know that probies have really no incentive to stay if there's nothing in it for them.