legal Free Legal Advice

[MNdMud4s3x]

That would be purely civil in character, which means...walang kulong. Sa criminal cases lang may kulong.

The obligor has the option to run after you for collection of the unpaid balance, or to charge you for breach of contract. In any case, he will ask for an award of damages and possible nullification of the contract ( if the complaint is for breach of contract).

 

amen.

[Meloy]

yep. i asked ng kung anung qualification nung bugging e. la na reply

 

 

oh sorry heres the case. i had an ex fubu. shes a decent goodlooking girl with a good career but she extremly horny. when i stopped seeing her because of i kinda feel she was falling for me na, she texted me na she will destroy my family so that my wife will leave me and i can be hers na. She even has sex video and photos of us which she threatens to show my wife given the chance. Thats why i asked if i can get the same protection as the VAWC me being a guy

[jon]

mga atty ka mtc uso ba sa atin dito sa pinas ang kaso misrepresentation? bale dealer ako ng isa sikat na product tapos para lang makuha ng ahente mga commision nya he told us nasa top three kami sa awardee, so kami naman kuha kahit madami pa stock tsk. another thing mga tao ko lang ang witnesses paro lahat willing to testify against him. ano parusa sa ganito? thanks in advance

[rafer_alston]

That would be purely civil in character, which means...walang kulong. Sa criminal cases lang may kulong.

The obligor has the option to run after you for collection of the unpaid balance, or to charge you for breach of contract. In any case, he will ask for an award of damages and possible nullification of the contract ( if the complaint is for breach of contract).

 

 

kasi hina harass ako ng auditor nila na pinababayaran nya sa akin yung 50% ng balance ko (roughly around P40,000+) kaso nga sabi ko, san ko kukunin yun eh di naman kami malakas kumita??

 

thanks boss jojoendejr...i do hope na makabawi ako sa iyo sa mga good advices na binibigay mo sa akin, thanks!!

 

 

That would be purely civil in character, which means...walang kulong. Sa criminal cases lang may kulong.

The obligor has the option to run after you for collection of the unpaid balance, or to charge you for breach of contract. In any case, he will ask for an award of damages and possible nullification of the contract ( if the complaint is for breach of contract).

 

 

kasi hina harass ako ng auditor nila na pinababayaran nya sa akin yung 50% ng balance ko (roughly around P40,000+) kaso nga sabi ko, san ko kukunin yun eh di naman kami malakas kumita??

 

thanks boss jojoendejr...i do hope na makabawi ako sa iyo sa mga good advices na binibigay mo sa akin, thanks!!

 

[MNdMud4s3x]

mga atty ka mtc uso ba sa atin dito sa pinas ang kaso misrepresentation? bale dealer ako ng isa sikat na product tapos para lang makuha ng ahente mga commision nya he told us nasa top three kami sa awardee, so kami naman kuha kahit madami pa stock tsk. another thing mga tao ko lang ang witnesses paro lahat willing to testify against him. ano parusa sa ganito? thanks in advance

 

as a rule, there is no cause of action for misrepresentation per se, unless otherwise, provided by law or the contract.

 

sa tingin ko sa kaso mo pre, la naman contract existing between you and the agent. given the facts, it appears that you relied solely on his MISREPRESENTATION which caused loss on your part. eto yung problema mo. technically, there is no juridical realtionship between you and the agent. kung baga, nag sales talk lang siya sayo tapos naniwala ka naman. that is allowed.

 

the bigger question is, you incurred losses and pano mo mahahabol to? from the given facts, wala ka magagawa dun. there was injury on your part but there is no damage which could be a reason for you to go after the agent:damnum absque injuria.

 

i would suggest that you continue marketing the surplus products you ordered para di ka na lang malugi.

[MNdMud4s3x]

mga atty ka mtc uso ba sa atin dito sa pinas ang kaso misrepresentation? bale dealer ako ng isa sikat na product tapos para lang makuha ng ahente mga commision nya he told us nasa top three kami sa awardee, so kami naman kuha kahit madami pa stock tsk. another thing mga tao ko lang ang witnesses paro lahat willing to testify against him. ano parusa sa ganito? thanks in advance

 

as a rule, there is no cause of action for misrepresentation per se, unless otherwise, provided by law or the contract.

 

sa tingin ko sa kaso mo pre, la naman contract existing between you and the agent. given the facts, it appears that you relied solely on his MISREPRESENTATION which caused loss on your part. kung baga, nag sales talk lang siya sayo tapos naniwala ka naman. that is allowed.

 

the bitter fact is, you incurred losses and pano mo mahahabol to? from the given facts, wala ka magagawa dun. there was injury on your part but there is no damage which could be a reason for you to go after the agent:damnum absque injuria.

 

i would suggest that you continue marketing the surplus products you ordered para di ka na lang malugi. :cry:

[jon]

as a rule, there is no cause of action for misrepresentation per se, unless otherwise, provided by law or the contract.

 

sa tingin ko sa kaso mo pre, la naman contract existing between you and the agent. given the facts, it appears that you relied solely on his MISREPRESENTATION which caused loss on your part. kung baga, nag sales talk lang siya sayo tapos naniwala ka naman. that is allowed.

 

the bitter fact is, you incurred losses and pano mo mahahabol to? from the given facts, wala ka magagawa dun. there was injury on your part but there is no damage which could be a reason for you to go after the agent:damnum absque injuria.

 

i would suggest that you continue marketing the surplus products you ordered para di ka na lang malugi. :cry:

 

 

maraming2 salamat dorb (brod) i notice magkasunod pasok natin dito mtc oldtimers ba ga, pahabol na question e kung gusto ko lang mag scandal ng konti? i would just like to make some noise na hinabla ko yung ahente especially sa company nya, dami din kasi asar sa kanya dun masyadong yumabang dahil nga naabot nya madali target sales nya, gagastos ako yes and mag mumukha ako doble talo pero lam mo na gusto ko lang mapahiya sya. so maybe sasagot mo "its up to me" heheh. last parting word of wisdom from you dorb? thanks

 

 

as a rule, there is no cause of action for misrepresentation per se, unless otherwise, provided by law or the contract.

 

sa tingin ko sa kaso mo pre, la naman contract existing between you and the agent. given the facts, it appears that you relied solely on his MISREPRESENTATION which caused loss on your part. kung baga, nag sales talk lang siya sayo tapos naniwala ka naman. that is allowed.

 

the bitter fact is, you incurred losses and pano mo mahahabol to? from the given facts, wala ka magagawa dun. there was injury on your part but there is no damage which could be a reason for you to go after the agent:damnum absque injuria.

 

i would suggest that you continue marketing the surplus products you ordered para di ka na lang malugi. :cry:

 

 

maraming2 salamat dorb (brod) i notice magkasunod pasok natin dito mtc oldtimers ba ga, pahabol na question e kung gusto ko lang mag scandal ng konti? i would just like to make some noise na hinabla ko yung ahente especially sa company nya, dami din kasi asar sa kanya dun masyadong yumabang dahil nga naabot nya madali target sales nya, gagastos ako yes and mag mumukha ako doble talo pero lam mo na gusto ko lang mapahiya sya. so maybe sasagot mo "its up to me" heheh. last parting word of wisdom from you dorb? thanks

 

 

as a rule, there is no cause of action for misrepresentation per se, unless otherwise, provided by law or the contract.

 

sa tingin ko sa kaso mo pre, la naman contract existing between you and the agent. given the facts, it appears that you relied solely on his MISREPRESENTATION which caused loss on your part. kung baga, nag sales talk lang siya sayo tapos naniwala ka naman. that is allowed.

 

the bitter fact is, you incurred losses and pano mo mahahabol to? from the given facts, wala ka magagawa dun. there was injury on your part but there is no damage which could be a reason for you to go after the agent:damnum absque injuria.

 

i would suggest that you continue marketing the surplus products you ordered para di ka na lang malugi. :cry:

 

 

maraming2 salamat dorb (brod) i notice magkasunod pasok natin dito mtc oldtimers ba ga, pahabol na question e kung gusto ko lang mag scandal ng konti? i would just like to make some noise na hinabla ko yung ahente especially sa company nya, dami din kasi asar sa kanya dun masyadong yumabang dahil nga naabot nya madali target sales nya, gagastos ako yes and mag mumukha ako doble talo pero lam mo na gusto ko lang mapahiya sya. so maybe sasagot mo "its up to me" heheh. last parting word of wisdom from you dorb? thanks

[jojoendejr]

oh sorry heres the case. i had an ex fubu. shes a decent goodlooking girl with a good career but she extremly horny. when i stopped seeing her because of i kinda feel she was falling for me na, she texted me na she will destroy my family so that my wife will leave me and i can be hers na. She even has sex video and photos of us which she threatens to show my wife given the chance. Thats why i asked if i can get the same protection as the VAWC me being a guy

 

 

U mean u gave her ur true address? And u even had a sex video taken? Shucks! U committed the mortal sin among chickboys! Hehe.

 

Mabigat nga problem mo. But u know, ang isang taong determined to do something, will move heaven and hell to do it. Just look at the assassins of Washington, Ninoy, etc. They won't care even if they got killed in the attempt. This means, ur problem is beyond legal. Why don't u just meet her and explain that it will not do both of u any good if she insist on her demands? Kahit guluhin niya ang misis mo, that doesn't mean na siguradong iiwan ka ni misis. And even if ur wife leaves you, there is nothing that can force you to be with that ex-fubu if ur decision is to get away from her. Try diplomacy pare.

 

Pag wala pa ring mangyari, i-ignore mo na lang. In my legal experience, I sometimes get threats. But its just that. Mere threats. Siyempre, pag gagawan ka ba ng masama ng isang tao, magpapaalam pa muna sa iyo? Just a brotherly advice from me.

[Meloy]

U mean u gave her ur true address? And u even had a sex video taken? Shucks! U committed the mortal sin among chickboys! Hehe.

 

Mabigat nga problem mo. But u know, ang isang taong determined to do something, will move heaven and hell to do it. Just look at the assassins of Washington, Ninoy, etc. They won't care even if they got killed in the attempt. This means, ur problem is beyond legal. Why don't u just meet her and explain that it will not do both of u any good if she insist on her demands? Kahit guluhin niya ang misis mo, that doesn't mean na siguradong iiwan ka ni misis. And even if ur wife leaves you, there is nothing that can force you to be with that ex-fubu if ur decision is to get away from her. Try diplomacy pare.

 

Pag wala pa ring mangyari, i-ignore mo na lang. In my legal experience, I sometimes get threats. But its just that. Mere threats. Siyempre, pag gagawan ka ba ng masama ng isang tao, magpapaalam pa muna sa iyo? Just a brotherly advice from me.

 

thanks for the advice bro. She was with me for 2 years and her parents kinda found out about us na bec of what she did and its actually the parents pushing her to do such stuff. i evven offered her money just to stay away pero she declined it. i'll keep your advice in mind.

[MNdMud4s3x]

maraming2 salamat dorb (brod) i notice magkasunod pasok natin dito mtc oldtimers ba ga, pahabol na question e kung gusto ko lang mag scandal ng konti? i would just like to make some noise na hinabla ko yung ahente especially sa company nya, dami din kasi asar sa kanya dun masyadong yumabang dahil nga naabot nya madali target sales nya, gagastos ako yes and mag mumukha ako doble talo pero lam mo na gusto ko lang mapahiya sya. so maybe sasagot mo "its up to me" heheh. last parting word of wisdom from you dorb? thanks

 

write the CEO or team manager nya or whoever has charge over the agent. just so to inform him how he got the quota hes bragging about. make the company realize that their agents have bad marketing practices, they deviate from the corporate policies, etc.,. point out that this will make them lose clients, etc., if this continues. name the agent. demand that proper action fro the management for a continued transaction with your company. :thumbsupsmiley:

[RSSS]

My mom received a registered mail yesterday from the homeowners association of a certain village. We were shocked when the letter states that my mom owes them 100k+ for the association dues. That includes 60k+ penalty that was imposed, since the letter states that she did not pay the dues since 1980.

 

My mom said that she will pay the association dues right away but for the penalty, she wanted they must waive it for the following reason:

 

She does not go to that place for a long time already so she wasen't aware of the rules the association makes. Since she is a member, she should be sent mails about new or changes made about the policies of the association. First of all she must be notified upon the first year when she did'nt pay the dues. She was not notified or mailed about the fees since 1980. They only informed her now when the dues had piled up. Thats why the penalty is more than the association dues.

 

To all lawyers here or people who have encountered this, what advise can you make regarding this dilemma? Thank you in advance.

[kadafy]

mga paps, baka naman po may contact num kayo ng law office ni atty. katrina legarda. a friend wants to get her services for her annulment case. pa-pm na lang po if ever. thanks a bunch!

[Roubaix]

mga paps, baka naman po may contact num kayo ng law office ni atty. katrina legarda. a friend wants to get her services for her annulment case. pa-pm na lang po if ever. thanks a bunch!

 

Check the yellow pages, her firm is listed there. But I warn you, to get her services personally is going to be at least 6 figures for the acceptance fee.

[kadafy]

Check the yellow pages, her firm is listed there. But I warn you, to get her services personally is going to be at least 6 figures for the acceptance fee.

 

 

thanks man. already tried that. called all the firms with "legarda". no success. perhaps you can give me the name of her firm?

 

thanks for the heads-up. i'm pretty sure my friend has an idea how much legarda's sevices will cost her.

[MNdMud4s3x]

My mom received a registered mail yesterday from the homeowners association of a certain village. We were shocked when the letter states that my mom owes them 100k+ for the association dues. That includes 60k+ penalty that was imposed, since the letter states that she did not pay the dues since 1980.

 

My mom said that she will pay the association dues right away but for the penalty, she wanted they must waive it for the following reason:

 

She does not go to that place for a long time already so she wasen't aware of the rules the association makes. Since she is a member, she should be sent mails about new or changes made about the policies of the association. First of all she must be notified upon the first year when she did'nt pay the dues. She was not notified or mailed about the fees since 1980. They only informed her now when the dues had piled up. Thats why the penalty is more than the association dues.

 

To all lawyers here or people who have encountered this, what advise can you make regarding this dilemma? Thank you in advance.

 

better talk to the officers of the association. follow your agrument "First of all she must be notified upon the first year when she did'nt pay the dues. She was not notified or mailed about the fees since 1980. They only informed her now when the dues had piled up. Thats why the penalty is more than the association dues". hindi dapat ganito ang nangyari if she has been notified.

 

As a rule, a party cannot be considered in default when there is no demand or notification. Corollary, notwithstanding the demand, surcharges shall not automatically accrue without a stipulation in the contract, by-laws, issuance, etc of the association. Moreover, the law provides that the provision in the contract should explicitly state that surcharges shall acrrue in case of default even without prior notification.

 

Yan ang mga precepts na pwede nyong gamitin to deny liability for the surcharges.

 

I suggest that you get a copy of the by laws or issuances of the association. look for provisions regarding the accrual of surcharges in case of default in the payment of asso dues. dapat explicit it at kung anung rate ang surcharges. kung wala nun, you can always deny payment of the surcharges. Anyways, the association will most likely agree on settling the issue, kung dues din lang naman ang usapin.