legal Free Legal Advice

[kenji_1989]

sir ano po yung mobo mo? lam ko kc ung max HDD size limitation nde sa OS but sa design ng mobo.

 

Yup lam ko yun pero seeing the others having 300GB and up of HD, this made me think..MSI K8N Neo-F Socket 939...Yung installer ko kasi walang Service Pack..Yung tanong ko is if I have an XP na may integrated SP2, mareresolve ko na yang issue na yan? Kaysa kasi magdownload pa ko sa Microsoft Website and detect ganito ganyan..

[lonely_gurl]

hi, i have something to consult with. can you PM me your number.. thank you in advance..

 

any query about legal problems...? wag kang mahiya.. free legal advise ni Butsoy...

[vagabond]

Deposit the checks that are due, let them bounce (returned to you stamped 'DAIF' or 'CLOSED ACCOUNT') and then file a criminal case for violation of BP 22.

tnx.

 

what happens when i file for the criminal case? how much does a lawyer cost? tnx again.

[touchdown06]

Mga bossing, ung PC dito laging sinasabi LOW DISK pero kung titinangnan mo ung PROPERTIES e wala pang 1/4 ung nagagamit sa spaces, ano kaya pwdeng problem nun [kung meron man]

Salamat po.

[oliverjohnholmes]

 

Case B:

in a case of a bigamous marriage, but the first spouse could not be found, and the second spouse opts for declaration of nullity of marriage, what would the consequence be on the spouse seeking such nullity (ie any tax implications, matters of co ownership over properties and the like)?

 

how's life been treating you bro?

 

 

any takers?

[Dr_PepPeR]

tnx.

 

what happens when i file for the criminal case? how much does a lawyer cost? tnx again.

 

I assumed your objective was to compel payment. Most people will try to avoid a criminal case since this becomes a black mark on your character and would rather settle than have it reach the courts. Part of the penalty for the bouncing checks law was imprisonment but I heard that this isn't being done by the courts anymore. I have no idea how much a lawyer costs, it might depend on your agreement with him/her.

[ncd]

hello to mtc legal forum. more power to all of you guys :mtc:

[jopoc]

Deposit the checks that are due, let them bounce (returned to you stamped 'DAIF' or 'CLOSED ACCOUNT') and then file a criminal case for violation of BP 22.

 

If i may add lang po....

 

send a written demand letter, have the one who issued the check receive it (have her/him sign the receiving copy).

but it would be better if the lawyer would do that for you.

 

 

 

tnx.

 

what happens when i file for the criminal case? how much does a lawyer cost? tnx again.

 

normally, the case will be directly filed in court, then the one who issued will be subjected to arraignment.

what the judge does after arriagnment is to send it to mediation wherein you guys can find a solution to the problem.

 

 

I assumed your objective was to compel payment. Most people will try to avoid a criminal case since this becomes a black mark on your character and would rather settle than have it reach the courts. Part of the penalty for the bouncing checks law was imprisonment but I heard that this isn't being done by the courts anymore. I have no idea how much a lawyer costs, it might depend on your agreement with him/her.

 

usually, the jusge just penalizes the issuer with fine twice the amount of the check.

imprisonment is usually resorted if the accused becomes a habitual offender.

[jopoc]

Hi people.

Quick question.

A college friend of mine incurred a loan from a credit card

The company of the card company closed already for like.,... 8 years and there are various collection agencies going after him. However, my friend also transferred residence.

 

After a number of years, the collection agency filed a case of fraud and there was a warrant of arrest served. Cash bond was filed and arraignment was scheduled soon.

 

Since he transferred residence and he did not receive the notices for hearing, can an appeal or motion be made to defer arraignment and bring the case back to the fiscal for hearing?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

The basis pala of the fraud case was due to the change of address without providing a notice nor informing the credit agency. But since the bank closed, where can he file the notice?

 

 

the accused could ask for a reinvestigation on the ground that he was not been duly summoned in the Preliminary Investigation.

 

 

i believe that he should be receiving notices from court from now on since you said he already posted bail. a requirement in posting bail is to give your home address.

[booby_trap]

ok, i need help with a certiorari case.

 

basic facts:

x filed a civil case for reconveyance against y in the rtc. rtc ruled in favor of y and affirmed that the property in question was correctly titled in his favor. the decision was modified 3 times. the same was appealed to the CA and then elevated to the SC. SC dismissed it on pure technicality.

 

now, the SC issued an entry of judgment. decision is already final. y sought to execute it. (the execution would mean demanding x and all her privies to vacate the property plus demolition of all structures erected thereon, considering that x is in actual physical possession of the land). rtc issued a writ of demolition and sheriff gave a demand letter. the issuances were directed to x and her privies.

 

a, b, c, d and e are occupants of the subject premises. they were never impleaded in the civil case. they deny being privies to x. but the sheriff served them copies of the writ and the demand letter.

 

question: (1) can their properties be demolished? (though they were not made parties to the civil case and they deny their relationship with x. plus, they maintain that their occupancy was peaceful, uninterrupted...etc. they have been residing on the lot for approx. 15 years). (2) is there grave abuse of discretion on the part of the rtc when the assailed writ of demolition was issued and directed against them as well?

 

 

heeeeeeeeeelp please. i'm super confused. thanks

[Bloodraven]

Great day to our lawyer friends.

 

A little question I'd like to post.

 

I'm helping out a "friend" (lets not dwell any deeper into that-hehe) with thier finances. And took it upon myslef to help pay for thier utilities and housing.

 

Due to "difficulties", it has been rather difficult for me to move my funds to and throw.

 

vague backrounder there... anyway to the problem...

 

As per SOP whenever renting an apartment the standard 1 month advance and 2 month deposit rule applies. So fat chance that I managed to do without that. I was told this afternoon that the landlord approached them "claiming" that they were 3 months delayed. Truth of the matter is 1 month deposit was used about 3 months ago, and rent for this month has been delayed.

 

My questions are:

 

1. Doesn't the deposit cover for any delinquency in payment?

 

2. If the 3 month non-payment of rent grounds for eviction, are they just trying to push it? Rent is due every 8th of the month. I haven't payed for this month so that makes it a 1 month delay plus the 1 month deposit they used up a few months ago.

 

3. These people charge me 8k a month but gives me a 6k reciept (because thats the price stated on the contract), what can be done about that?

 

4. These people issue a bogus reciept, with bogus tax numbers...

 

Need to know what rights I can uphold here and how to tell them diplomatically if any housing laws are being broken here without having my "friend" kicked-out on her hinnies.

 

Much thanks compadres....

[MERCER]

Hi guys!

 

Have a friend who's already legally separated with her husband, but now wants to have the name of her kid changed back to her maiden name. What can she do to have this done? Do you know anybody who specializes in such and could get this done quickly? Thanks!

 

[sancho_panda]

patulong po.. may USB disk ako na 2Gigs, kaso napuno sya... ayaw mareformat... kapg itry ko i-open "pls insert disk on drive g:" lumalabas.. may magagawa pa po ba dito? thanks!

[vagabond]

I assumed your objective was to compel payment. Most people will try to avoid a criminal case since this becomes a black mark on your character and would rather settle than have it reach the courts. Part of the penalty for the bouncing checks law was imprisonment but I heard that this isn't being done by the courts anymore. I have no idea how much a lawyer costs, it might depend on your agreement with him/her.

 

 

If i may add lang po....

 

send a written demand letter, have the one who issued the check receive it (have her/him sign the receiving copy).

but it would be better if the lawyer would do that for you.

normally, the case will be directly filed in court, then the one who issued will be subjected to arraignment.

what the judge does after arriagnment is to send it to mediation wherein you guys can find a solution to the problem.

usually, the jusge just penalizes the issuer with fine twice the amount of the check.

imprisonment is usually resorted if the accused becomes a habitual offender.

tnx to both of you... are you guys interested if i take it to court? if not do you have anyone you can recommend? i'm also looking for a lawyer near my area (alabang, las pinas, p'que)...

 

also what is my recourse if the one who owes me money "disappear?"

[oliverjohnholmes]

Hi guys!

 

Have a friend who's already legally separated with her husband, but now wants to have the name of her kid changed back to her maiden name. What can she do to have this done? Do you know anybody who specializes in such and could get this done quickly? Thanks!

 

 

you may have a problem with this... as far as i know this cannot be done...

 

legal separation means that the union (or the marriage) is still valid and binding, and the only effect on the said conjugal partnership is separation physically and the dissolution of property relations between spouses... thus all rights from the fruits of the union is vested and cannot be simply changed without running afoul of other legalities...

 

a quick question, since the question stated that the child's surname be "changed back" to the mother's maiden name i surmise that the marriage came after the birth of the child? once vested with the name (by the subsequent marriage and the whole process of changing the surname) it would be quite a feat to have it reverted, unless without use of extra-legal means...

 

just my two cents...