legal Free Legal Advice

[Kurtsky Keigee]

Hayz sarap itapon ng PC ko ngayon nag convert lang ako ng file sa virtualdub tapos biglang nag blue screen ulit IRQ_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL

[boy_totnak]

nga tol tulong naman. naghahang kc pc k. laging not respondng mga program. kung minsan nagoopen naman pero how many years bago mag open. malaki pa naman free space sa hd k. ito specs ko. 512mb ddr2, celeron d 3.6ghz shared video card. mga tol patulong naman. dapat nb me mag upgrade?

[xXxtianxXx]

better get a video card

i dont suggest using the built-in VC

mababa kasi

 

and reformat ur pc

mag install ka agad ng anti-virus after reformat

[boy_totnak]

bro, ano marecommend mo na magandang antivirus at anti spyware? thanks

[charmed shannen]

Does anybody in this thread know the citation of the disbarment case re: Ericta case.. Paki provide naman pls.. Thanks a lot.

[jopoc]

Does anybody in this thread know the citation of the disbarment case re: Ericta case.. Paki provide naman pls.. Thanks a lot.

 

 

if its a new one. you might wanna search it sa SC website

[rick9plus]

The marriage is legal. I am assuming that the "reverend" is duly authorized by his religious sect to solemnize marriage hence under the Family Code, he would have authority to solemnize marriage (see Art. 7[2] of the Family Code), thus even if he wasn't a judge, the marriage would still be valid.

 

In fact, even assuming that he had no authority to perform marriages, since your friend thought the guy who performed the marriage was authorized to do so, the marriage would still be valid, as provided for by Article 35(2) of the Family Code.

 

Art. 35. The following marriages shall be void from the beginning:

(2) Those solemnized by any person not legally authorized to perform marriages UNLESS SUCH MARRIAGES WERE CONTRACTED WITH EITHER OR BOTH PARTIES BELIEVING IN GOOD FAITH THAT THE SOLEMNIZING OFFICER HAD THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DO SO;

 

 

Thanks for the info. I really need to help my friend because all her friends were telling her that her marriage is fake due to the reverend thinggy.

 

But after reading further, some threads mentioned about lack of license. She mentioned not seeing/issued any licenses. She also says that their marriage contract shows that her husbands address was not his address and they put San Juan instead and the venue of the ceremony was says in groom's house instead of Manila City Hall. She went to NSO to verify and got a no record so she went to Manila cityhall and the registry told her that her record was sent to NSO and will be available next month.

 

Is this kind of marriage void? Even if it goes to NSO?

 

 

 

 

 

:mtc:

Edited February 27, 2007 by rick9plus

[Dr_PepPeR]

if its a new one. you might wanna search it sa SC website

 

Master if I remember right, this is an old case arising out of the 1982 BAR controversy when then Justice Vicente Ericta was reported to have personally approached the bar chairman to inquire whether his (Ericta's) son passed the bar, raising suspicion he exerted pressure on the chairman.

[charmed shannen]

if its a new one. you might wanna search it sa SC website

 

it's an old case po. If it is, i could have done that sir.. thanks

[fernando_poh]

bro, ano marecommend mo na magandang antivirus at anti spyware? thanks

 

try mo downlud home edition sa www.avast.com, it works for me

[jopoc]

Master if I remember right, this is an old case arising out of the 1982 BAR controversy when then Justice Vicente Ericta was reported to have personally approached the bar chairman to inquire whether his (Ericta's) son passed the bar, raising suspicion he exerted pressure on the chairman.

 

 

it's an old case po. If it is, i could have done that sir.. thanks

 

 

i see, allow me until tom and i will try to get hold of a soft copy of the case.

 

absent ata ako nung diniscuss yun. hehehehe

[charmed shannen]

i see, allow me until tom and i will try to get hold of a soft copy of the case.

 

absent ata ako nung diniscuss yun. hehehehe

 

 

Thank you Master Jopoc.. Nag reresearch din naman ako sa iba. Para di nakakahiya sa iyo :flowers:

[fauxhead]

I don't know if there was a disbarment case that arose out of the 1982 bar scandal. What I remember is that 12 of the 14 sitting SC justices resigned because of that, including the SC chief.

 

I don't know if this would help, but in 1972,an administrative case (not disbarment though) was filed against then Judge Vicente Ericta. Please follow the link.

 

http://www.asianlii.org/ph/cases/PHSC/1972/172.html

 

Thank you Master Jopoc.. Nag reresearch din naman ako sa iba. Para di nakakahiya sa iyo :flowers:

[charmed shannen]

I don't know if there was a disbarment case that arose out of the 1982 bar scandal. What I remember is that 12 of the 14 sitting SC justices resigned because of that, including the SC chief.

 

I don't know if this would help, but in 1972,an administrative case (not disbarment though) was filed against then Judge Vicente Ericta. Please follow the link.

 

http://www.asianlii.org/ph/cases/PHSC/1972/172.html

 

 

Good morning Sir Fauxhead. Thanks for being ever so nice. Dr. Pepper's recollection of the case is what i need.

But i owe you one (or two) for being always helpful. Pdalan kita ng 1 kilo of butung pakwan which you must consume in an hour. Thanks. thanks

[charmed shannen]

Master if I remember right, this is an old case arising out of the 1982 BAR controversy when then Justice Vicente Ericta was reported to have personally approached the bar chairman to inquire whether his (Ericta's) son passed the bar, raising suspicion he exerted pressure on the chairman.

 

 

Sana you can recall the citation din Sir. Thanks for the info. Also sa input mo sa previous post ko. Thanks. thanks