den eye Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 Time? Months if you're very lucky. Expect years Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 (edited) changing my post in respect to bonito. i dont want to be a principal by inducement. nyahahaha Edited February 3, 2007 by jopoc Quote Link to comment
MODERATOR bonito99 Posted February 3, 2007 MODERATOR Share Posted February 3, 2007 I wouldn't suggest that. Even in jest. Quote Link to comment
bRIX Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 while we're in this topic.... is there anyway to make the transcoding process faster? it just takes too damn long for a 700mb avi file to burn into a dvd video (say 3hrs or more). is there things i have to tweak in nero or my system? thanks. Quote Link to comment
charmed shannen Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Good morning. I have been assigned to do a study on the forfeited properties of the late President Marcos in Tacloban. I would appreciate it very much if you can share some inputs, discussion/materials to the topic concerned. Here goes: There were some levied properties of the Marcoses in Tacloban for partial payment of tax liabilities of the former. These properties were never sequestered by the PCGG in an unexplained wealth cases but were levied upon by the BIR in payment of the aforementioned tax liabilities. There seems to be a cascading conflict through all the years that the levied properties are not covered by the PCGG, therefore they should render to the BIR revenue accounting of all the proceeds received in their allegedly sequestration power over the levy power of the BIR. Another question to be provoked is why the BIR computed a big estate tax on the gross estate of Ferdinand Marcos if these were allegedly ill-gotten? If this was so, these could have been identified as "claims against the Estate" which are deductible from the taxable gross estate of Ferdinand Marcos, thus a negative estate tax deficiency will result. thank you very much. Quote Link to comment
TMX_626 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 In relation to Annulment of Marriages, may I request enlightenment on the following? 1. Can either be the husband or the wife file an annulment of marriage in the Family Court?2. If the Husband verbally confirmed, with witnesses from members of the family of both parties, of infidelity, as to what extent that this fact affect the annulment case?3. Does anyone know a commendable lawyer who handles this kind of cases? A pm will be appreciated gentlemen. Thank you in advance! Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 In relation to Annulment of Marriages, may I request enlightenment on the following? 1. Can either be the husband or the wife file an annulment of marriage in the Family Court?2. If the Husband verbally confirmed, with witnesses from members of the family of both parties, of infidelity, as to what extent that this fact affect the annulment case? Thank you in advance! 1. any of the spouses can file for annulment 2. infidelity per se is not a ground for annulment, it is a ground for legal separation. if you want it to be a ground for annulment, apply it as a a psychological incapacity. make it look like an incurable psych prob of the husband. Quote Link to comment
kaplogan Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 need a lawyer about estafa suit mayroon ba kayo irerefer? Quote Link to comment
TMX_626 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 1. any of the spouses can file for annulment 2. infidelity per se is not a ground for annulment, it is a ground for legal separation. if you want it to be a ground for annulment, apply it as a a psychological incapacity. make it look like an incurable psych prob of the husband. thanks sir! it would seem that an incurable psych problem is a delicate and trivial matter to point out. especially on the part of the husband just in case he files a case. indebted by your kindness,TMX Quote Link to comment
Kurtsky Keigee Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 while we're in this topic....is there anyway to make the transcoding process faster? it just takes too damn long for a 700mb avi file to burn into a dvd video (say 3hrs or more). is there things i have to tweak in nero or my system? thanks. Bro try mo ung TMpeg tools or Tmpeg all in one meron ata silang tmpeg software to convert avi to dvd na mabilis at hinde na kelangan bantayan Quote Link to comment
Kurtsky Keigee Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Mga bro I need help on the best DVD to avi converting softwarePreferred ko ung mula DVD to divx or mp4. Ano ba pinaka mabilis at pinaka efficient ung pwedeng i tweak ung settings like bitrate/codec etc.Mas ok if free. I Used TMPEG,virtualdub,IMtoo and Xilisoft pangit lahat 1 dvd to avi mga 5 hours eh Thanks Quote Link to comment
chocobeer89 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 You can always take back the ownership of the folders, and then retake full access. As the local admin, you must first modify the permission and remove the default setting which makes folders inherit the parent permissions. Once that has been removed, then you can freely take back the control of that folder and all the individual files and folders inside it. ok na po. salamat Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted February 7, 2007 Author Share Posted February 7, 2007 Hello guys! I was recently involved in a vehicular accident where I bumped the back of another car. At the TMG, I agreed to reimburse their participation pay since they had comprehensive insurance and we shook on it, there was no signing of legal documents involved. Recently I received their letter with the invoices. The insurance paid a total of 15k and the person I talked to shouldered around 6k. But they were billing me for the total 15k. Should I pay them? Can they do that? Thanks in advance! Insurance do answer liabilities of the insured whenever they are covered... but property insurance like motor vehicles, who ever is at fault still pays. and the insurance company acquires the rights of its insured in collecting the damages due. so you still pay not to the owner of the car whom you bumped but to the insrance company who paid the insured owner of the car. Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted February 7, 2007 Author Share Posted February 7, 2007 need a lawyer about estafa suit mayroon ba kayo irerefer? you can ym me your problem... Butsoy Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted February 7, 2007 Author Share Posted February 7, 2007 I WAS MARRIED IN PHILIPPINES TO A PHILIPPINE CITIZEN !! MOVED TO AUSTRALIA WHERE MY PHILIPPINE WIFE BECAME A AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN --BALIKBAYAN. WE DIVORCED ( AFTER 16 YEARS) NOW I WANT TO GET DUEL CITIZENSHIP IN PHILIPPINES SO I CAN BUY AND OWN LAND IN THE PHILIPPINES --CAN I ???? JOHN (STUART51) its dual citizenship not duel hehehehe... if you are previously a natural born citizen of the Philippines yes you can Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.