keenpee Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago On 4/27/2025 at 10:35 AM, keenpee said: kapag Accion Reivindicatoria ung kaso and ung requesting party ay si defendant pero si defendant ay illegal settler. can they request it Any suggestion for this? Quote Link to comment
deejay_capslock Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago Accion Reivindicatoria focuses on ownership and possession. How cam the defendant request this relief kung nde sya ung complainant? Quote Link to comment
deejay_capslock Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago What is this about? 13 hours ago, Ice said: Thank you. Is there anybody who can assit legally and i can provide a percentage of the collected amount Value about P1.3M Quote Link to comment
deejay_capslock Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago Depende yan sir kung ano ung Threat syo whether it would fall as Grave or Light threats. There is a prescription period sa kada krimen so you need to take of that also On 4/27/2025 at 10:41 AM, keenpee said: can i ask if defendant can file for petition for relief of judgment rule 38 sa Accion Reivindicatoria kapag meron issue sa docs that was filed as formal exhibit by the plaintiffs way back from the start of the hearing? if they claim meritorious reason for fame the defendants are not part of the doc as they are illegal settlers. Quote Link to comment
deejay_capslock Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago I suggest consulting a lawyer for this. On 5/2/2025 at 1:03 PM, Ice said: Anybody who has experience with filing a case for a personal investment that did not pay out the interest and capital? Have a comtract for it. Quote Link to comment
keenpee Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 10 hours ago, deejay_capslock said: Depende yan sir kung ano ung Threat syo whether it would fall as Grave or Light threats. There is a prescription period sa kada krimen so you need to take of that also Ah yung question po sa rule 38 not the threat Quote Link to comment
keenpee Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Defendants ung nakapossess ng property and sya ung complained party or defendant. Kapag nailabas na ung finality or entry of judgment can they use the evidences presented during the trial again sa petition for relief of judgement rule 38. Example exhibit A which has been presented and heard during actual trial. And they are not part of the document. Questions 1) can they still use the evidences sa formal offer ng plaintiffs for this rule 38 or need new evidence? Since napagusapan na ung mga evidences during regular trial can they dig the previous evidences and say ' ay may nakita kami na kaduda duda.' when their chance to check the docs has lapsed? 2) they are not part of the documents since illegal settlers sila their documents points to another lot. Tia Quote Link to comment
keenpee Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago On 4/27/2025 at 10:35 AM, keenpee said: kapag Accion Reivindicatoria ung kaso and ung requesting party ay si defendant pero si defendant ay illegal settler. can they request it Pued po ba ito? Quote Link to comment
keenpee Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, deejay_capslock said: Accion Reivindicatoria focuses on ownership and possession. How cam the defendant request this relief kung nde sya ung complainant? Kapag meron na finality can they file this as they are illegal settlers. Quote Link to comment
mic man Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) If a party is not part sa Isang deed contract. Can they request a ctc notarized copy sa rtc where the notary public is, while gathering evidences or doing verification? Edited 4 hours ago by mic man Quote Link to comment
Aries0818 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 30 minutes ago, mic man said: If a party is not part sa Isang deed contract. Can they request a ctc notarized copy sa rtc where the notary public is, while gathering evidences or doing verification? Yes because once a notarized document is filed with the OCC of the RTC it becomes a public document but you would have to put a purpose why you have to secure a copy sometimes they just put the reason for some “legal purpose/s” usually it is allowed like for filing of cases like falsification or perjury the OCC allows that to be issued in favor of a third party. Edited 3 hours ago by Aries0818 Grammar Quote Link to comment
mic man Posted 45 minutes ago Share Posted 45 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Aries0818 said: Yes because once a notarized document is filed with the OCC of the RTC it becomes a public document but you would have to put a purpose why you have to secure a copy sometimes they just put the reason for some “legal purpose/s” usually it is allowed like for filing of cases like falsification or perjury the OCC allows that to be issued in favor of a third party. How come Sabi Ng staff kelangan parties involved only? Need authorization daw if third party from parties involved kung kukuha Sila. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.