Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Free Legal Advice


Butsoy

Recommended Posts

Hi mga masters, question regarding sa software development, let say wala kayo contract for creating a web application, and you are doing it as freelance project. Based sa online article na nabasa ko the one who has rights is to the one who writes the code, edi ako un. Then because of trust, nagbigay ako ng access kay client to check the file, then na monitor ko na nilipat na nila sa ibang domain ung application ko without my knowledge. May pwede ba ako habol dun?

oo, sa iyo yun eh.

 

ang tanong, ano ang ebidensya mo na sa iyo yun. baka dun ka sumadsad. kailangan may matibay kang ebidensya na sa iyo nga yun.

Link to comment

Thanks, yes meron, compiled na kasi ung nasa kanila... need to consult na sa attorney.

other comment sa ibang masters...

oo, sa iyo yun eh.

 

ang tanong, ano ang ebidensya mo na sa iyo yun. baka dun ka sumadsad. kailangan may matibay kang ebidensya na sa iyo nga yun.

Link to comment

Spa Chiba in paranaque niraid nung March 21 the sad news is ung mga girls nakahold sa dswd haven for women parang sila nakakulong dun I'm with friends with a thera nakakaawa Wala Naman sila baket sila nakadetain dun? Paanu Kung tumakbo na ung may ari ng spa patay na sila??? I need advice Kung paanu mapabilis makalabas sila SA dswd sabihn abutin pa NG 6 months to a year??? Paanu kawawa Naman sila victim Lang sila

Edited by Pablo_apprentice
Link to comment

 

Legitimation falls under Rule 108 of the Rules of Court.

 

Changing the middle name to the last name is, unfortunately, not considered a mere "clerical error" (even of the reason for the discrepancy in the entry is, in fact, a clerical error) and would likewise be subject to Rule 108, under "changes of name."

 

Both procedures are fairly straightforward. Just watch out for the publication requirement, as you will have to spend for that.

 

 

Nahihirapan kasi kami si Mother wala birth certificate gusto pa magpa late registration eh nasa Leyte yun and wala rin Marriage Contract Parents so with this parang gusto ng Manila City Hall correct muna un mga yun bago un sa birth cetificate na dapat talaga ayusin

Link to comment

 

 

Nahihirapan kasi kami si Mother wala birth certificate gusto pa magpa late registration eh nasa Leyte yun and wala rin Marriage Contract Parents so with this parang gusto ng Manila City Hall correct muna un mga yun bago un sa birth cetificate na dapat talaga ayusin

 

Sorry, medyo nakakalito. Sino yung magpapapalit ng pangalan sa birth cert, and ano yung relation nun sa mother mo na walang birth cert, and sino yung may magulang na walang marriage cert?

Link to comment

I am a illegitimate child. May dad passed away last year leaving properties named under him and my mom(combined). My parents are not married btw. May makukuha ba yun anak nya sa una(legal wife) na nagpipilit sa ownership sa naiwan father ko kasi sya daw legitimate child kasi kasal father ko sa mother nya? Pero both parents ko naman nakapangalan properties at hindi solo sa father ko lang.

Link to comment

I am a illegitimate child. May dad passed away last year leaving properties named under him and my mom(combined). My parents are not married btw. May makukuha ba yun anak nya sa una(legal wife) na nagpipilit sa ownership sa naiwan father ko kasi sya daw legitimate child kasi kasal father ko sa mother nya? Pero both parents ko naman nakapangalan properties at hindi solo sa father ko lang.

is the legal wife still alive? If no, when did she pass away, before your dad and mom began living together, or after?

Link to comment

I believe the legal wife is still alive. I have never met her. My parents started living together

more than 34 years ago.

 

Q: May makukuha ba yun anak nya sa una(legal wife) na nagpipilit sa ownership?

 

Yes, meron sityang makukuha.

 

Assuming that the legal wife is still alive, that makes you illegitimate.

 

That also means that the property relations between your late father and your mother is governed by Art. 148 of the Family Code.

 

Art. 148 says that the properties acquired by your father and mother will be owned by them in proportion to their actual contribution. So, even if the properties are registered in both their names, if it was only your father who was working, the properties would belong solely to the conjugal partnership of your father and his legal wife (THIS IS A MATTER OF EVIDENCE. THEY HAVE TO PROVE THAT YOUR MOTHER HAD NO FINANCIAL CAPACITY TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY. Without any such proof, the presumption is that they own the properties 50:50)

 

As to the share of your father in the properties, that would belong to his heirs, you, his legal wife, and your legitimate half-sibling. The legitimate half-sibling is entitled to 1/2 of the property; you would be entitled to 1/4th; and the legal wife, the other fourth.

 

 

 

ther nd his legal wife were governed by "conju

 

May makukuha ba yun anak nya sa una(legal wife) na nagpipilit sa ownership sa naiwan father ko kasi sya daw legitimate child kasi kasal father ko sa mother nya? Pero both parents ko naman nakapangalan properties at hindi solo sa father ko lang.

Link to comment

 

Q: May makukuha ba yun anak nya sa una(legal wife) na nagpipilit sa ownership?

 

Yes, meron sityang makukuha.

 

Assuming that the legal wife is still alive, that makes you illegitimate.

 

That also means that the property relations between your late father and your mother is governed by Art. 148 of the Family Code.

 

Art. 148 says that the properties acquired by your father and mother will be owned by them in proportion to their actual contribution. So, even if the properties are registered in both their names, if it was only your father who was working, the properties would belong solely to the conjugal partnership of your father and his legal wife (THIS IS A MATTER OF EVIDENCE. THEY HAVE TO PROVE THAT YOUR MOTHER HAD NO FINANCIAL CAPACITY TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY. Without any such proof, the presumption is that they own the properties 50:50)

 

As to the share of your father in the properties, that would belong to his heirs, you, his legal wife, and your legitimate half-sibling. The legitimate half-sibling is entitled to 1/2 of the property; you would be entitled to 1/4th; and the legal wife, the other fourth.

 

 

 

ther nd his legal wife were governed by "conju

 

May makukuha ba yun anak nya sa una(legal wife) na nagpipilit sa ownership sa naiwan father ko kasi sya daw legitimate child kasi kasal father ko sa mother nya? Pero both parents ko naman nakapangalan properties at hindi solo sa father ko lang.

wow thank you very much for taking time to answer my queries. ^_^ God bless po.
Link to comment

Attorneys please help:

 

we had a family trip to burias island (island hopping). My wife arranged the trip through events coordinator. So c events coordinator ang may contact sa lahat (van, bangka, hotel etc). This trip is not exclusive sa family nmen, may ibang ksama na d nmen kilala. Before yung date ng alis nmen, may mga hininging details like names, ages and birth dates ng mga kasama (i suppose gagamitin sa manifesto).

 

When the set date comes, sa isang beach resort in san fransisco quezon kme mineet ng banka. Dun kme sumakay patawid papuntang burias. Since first time nmen, hindi nmen alam na may port pala na tamang daanan papuntang burias. Meaning sa back door pala dumaan yung banka since pag sa port kme nagdaan mababawasan ang pasahero nila. We were 35 persons on the boat. Ang sbe ng coast guards 20 lang max ang pinapayagan.

 

So accident happens, tumaob ang bangka nmen and we lost our 5 yr old daughter.

 

Question: can we file reckless imprudence resulting to homicide? How strong is the case?

Meron din bang case na pwede ikaso sa coordinator? Since sya ang kausap ng mga bankero and they should have make sure na dumaan sana kme sa port?

 

Salamat sa mga sasagot mga master.

Link to comment

Attorneys please help:

 

we had a family trip to burias island (island hopping). My wife arranged the trip through events coordinator. So c events coordinator ang may contact sa lahat (van, bangka, hotel etc). This trip is not exclusive sa family nmen, may ibang ksama na d nmen kilala. Before yung date ng alis nmen, may mga hininging details like names, ages and birth dates ng mga kasama (i suppose gagamitin sa manifesto).

 

When the set date comes, sa isang beach resort in san fransisco quezon kme mineet ng banka. Dun kme sumakay patawid papuntang burias. Since first time nmen, hindi nmen alam na may port pala na tamang daanan papuntang burias. Meaning sa back door pala dumaan yung banka since pag sa port kme nagdaan mababawasan ang pasahero nila. We were 35 persons on the boat. Ang sbe ng coast guards 20 lang max ang pinapayagan.

 

So accident happens, tumaob ang bangka nmen and we lost our 5 yr old daughter.

 

Question: can we file reckless imprudence resulting to homicide? How strong is the case?

Meron din bang case na pwede ikaso sa coordinator? Since sya ang kausap ng mga bankero and they should have make sure na dumaan sana kme sa port?

 

Salamat sa mga sasagot mga master.

 

Yes, you can file against the captain/boatman of the bangka for criminal liability, and if he is an employee, you can include the employer as regards the civil liability or damages, in case of insolvency of the employee only.

 

For your reference, Reckless imprudence consists involuntary, but without malice, doing or failing to do an act from which material damage results by reason of inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the person performing of failing to perform such act, taking into consideration his employment or occupation, degree of intelligence, physical condition and other circumstances regarding persons, time and place. To constitute the offense of reckless driving, the act must be something more than a mere negligence in the operation of the motor vehicle, but a willful and wanton disregard of the consequences is required. (G.R. No.178145). In your case, the fact that 35 people were loaded onto the vessel instead of the allowable load of 20 means that there is an inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the boatman/captain.

 

As to how strong the case is, it's hard to say because it is dependent on a variety of factors, primarily the evidence available at hand (i.e. police report, affidavits, etc.). If kulang and ebidensya, maaaring matalo padin ang kaso.

 

As regards the coordinator, it is possible, but it largely depends on the contract that you have with them. Their responsibility may be limited depending on the agreement you have with them.

 

Please note that my opinion is based on my understanding of the facts you stated. It could vary depending on additional information that you could disclose. I hope this helps.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment

 

Yes, you can file against the captain/boatman of the bangka for criminal liability, and if he is an employee, you can include the employer as regards the civil liability or damages, in case of insolvency of the employee only.

 

For your reference, Reckless imprudence consists involuntary, but without malice, doing or failing to do an act from which material damage results by reason of inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the person performing of failing to perform such act, taking into consideration his employment or occupation, degree of intelligence, physical condition and other circumstances regarding persons, time and place. To constitute the offense of reckless driving, the act must be something more than a mere negligence in the operation of the motor vehicle, but a willful and wanton disregard of the consequences is required. (G.R. No.178145). In your case, the fact that 35 people were loaded onto the vessel instead of the allowable load of 20 means that there is an inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the boatman/captain.

 

As to how strong the case is, it's hard to say because it is dependent on a variety of factors, primarily the evidence available at hand (i.e. police report, affidavits, etc.). If kulang and ebidensya, maaaring matalo padin ang kaso.

 

As regards the coordinator, it is possible, but it largely depends on the contract that you have with them. Their responsibility may be limited depending on the agreement you have with them.

 

Please note that my opinion is based on my understanding of the facts you stated. It could vary depending on additional information that you could disclose. I hope this helps.

Link to comment

Maraming salamat po sa sagot Yellowpanda.

Follow up question lang po. May possibility ba na magfile din kme or ilipat ang hearing dito sa Quezon City (residence address ng complainant)? Or dun lang tlaga sa pinangyarihan pwede dinigin ang kaso?

If ever pwede sa QC, ano2 ang kailangan nmen gawin?

Link to comment

Maraming salamat po sa sagot Yellowpanda.

Follow up question lang po. May possibility ba na magfile din kme or ilipat ang hearing dito sa Quezon City (residence address ng complainant)? Or dun lang tlaga sa pinangyarihan pwede dinigin ang kaso?

If ever pwede sa QC, ano2 ang kailangan nmen gawin?

As a rule, the court of the place where the crime was allegedly committed has jurisdiction to hear and try the case. Meaning, dun talaga sisimulan sa pinangyarihan. However, pag nasimulan na, pwede magpetition for change of venue sa supreme court, hindi din automatic yun na iggrant, kailangan padin talaga patunayan na magpapalipat ng venue ng trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...