Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Free Legal Advice


Butsoy

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey,

 

I am for the mini EB for horny attorneys. If anyone is interested, PM me for my email addy. I am volunteering to be the coordinator for this shindig. I am free all next week except for Tuesday night.

 

So far we have:

Butsoy

Dekampanilla

Huxley

and maybe Hyacinth.

Should we welcome also horny law students?

Kung pwede students pwede sumama boss?

Link to comment

mga sir, magtatanung lang po ako kung ano ang ibig sabihin ng "stipulation pour autrui"

kung puede po sa tagalog para mas maiintindihan at isang magandang at malupet na halimbawa po,

maraming salamat po

Stipulation pour autri ay isang sugnay o bahagi ng kontrata, kung saan binibigyan ng mga partido sa kontrata ng benepisyo ang isang tao na di naman kasali sa kontrata. Ibig sabihin, hindi siya kasali sa kontrata, pero pinapaboran siya ng kontrata (kailangang sinasadya talaga siyang bigyan ng benepisyo ng kontrata)

 

Example: credit card

 

ang may kontrata dito ay ang credit card company at yung establishment (kung saan napagkasunduan nila na kung sino man ay ang makapagpapakita ng credit card sa establishment igagalang ito ng tindahan at tatanggapin nila ito bilang kabayaran)

 

yung may hawak ng credit card ay beneficiary. ang nag-uusap talaga ay yung credit card company at yung establishment.

Link to comment

Stipulation pour autri ay isang sugnay o bahagi ng kontrata, kung saan binibigyan ng mga partido sa kontrata ng benepisyo ang isang tao na di naman kasali sa kontrata. Ibig sabihin, hindi siya kasali sa kontrata, pero pinapaboran siya ng kontrata (kailangang sinasadya talaga siyang bigyan ng benepisyo ng kontrata)

 

Example: credit card

 

ang may kontrata dito ay ang credit card company at yung establishment (kung saan napagkasunduan nila na kung sino man ay ang makapagpapakita ng credit card sa establishment igagalang ito ng tindahan at tatanggapin nila ito bilang kabayaran)

 

yung may hawak ng credit card ay beneficiary. ang nag-uusap talaga ay yung credit card company at yung establishment.

maraming salamat sir, mabuhay ka, thank you po ulet

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

Sir/Ma'am:

Can anyone here help a female friend? She badly need a good lawyer for sexual harassment vs. her former boss. Former boss since she was detailed to another office after filing a formal complaint. Now she feels like the odds are favoring the boss, well as we all know, power and influence.

She has nothing much to offer, and I would help out if ever. Lalake ako and may kalokohan but I hate abuse, violence and harassment towards women.

I hope someone would help.

Thanks.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I got a question regarding SSS pension.

 

My dad passed away last year. Unknowingly, may ibang name na nakalagay sa beneficiary nya na hindi nya inayos. Now, me and my mom are unsure kung ano ang marital status ng dad ko dun sa name na nakalagay sa beneficiary. May habol ba kami sa pension ng dad ko?

ang unang beneficary ng SSS member ay ang kaniyang asawa at mga anak na ang edad ay mas mababa sa 21. Sila muna ang may karapatan bago yung nakalista na beneficiary. Kung walang primary beneficiary, dun lang nakakapasok yung nakalistang beneficiary. Pinakamaganda niyan, tumawag sa SSS at magtanong dun

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi there. I have some questions regarding property leasing. A guy and his wife, newlyweds, wants to lease a property from my parents but he said he doesn't have bank checks yet. So he plans to let her father issue the post-dated checks and will be paying his dad in cash monthly. My parents plan to put the names of the son and his father in the contract as lessee, is it legally ok if only the son signs the contract as the lessee even if the checks are from his father's account or should the father sign as lessee as well? My parents had an experience before where they put two people as the lessee but the one who signs the contract is also the one who issued the checks. A

 

Any info will be appreciated.

Link to comment

Hi there. I have some questions regarding property leasing. A guy and his wife, newlyweds, wants to lease a property from my parents but he said he doesn't have bank checks yet. So he plans to let her father issue the post-dated checks and will be paying his dad in cash monthly. My parents plan to put the names of the son and his father in the contract as lessee, is it legally ok if only the son signs the contract as the lessee even if the checks are from his father's account or should the father sign as lessee as well? My parents had an experience before where they put two people as the lessee but the one who signs the contract is also the one who issued the checks. A

 

Any info will be appreciated.

no problem whether the father is included as a lessee or not, the important thing is he issues checks in favor of the landlord.

 

The Bouncing Check Law doesn't really care whether the person issuing the check benefited/profited from the transaction. So long as he issued the check, and the same bounces, the issuer becomes liable (yan lang naman ang habol ng humihingi ng check, yug maaari niyang kasuhan ng KRIMINAL yung nag-issue ng check. May kulong kasi pag talbog na cheke, kaya mas madaling maningil).

 

If you want, you can state in the Lease Contract that payments will be made by check issued by the father of the tenant.

Link to comment

no problem whether the father is included as a lessee or not, the important thing is he issues checks in favor of the landlord.

 

The Bouncing Check Law doesn't really care whether the person issuing the check benefited/profited from the transaction. So long as he issued the check, and the same bounces, the issuer becomes liable (yan lang naman ang habol ng humihingi ng check, yug maaari niyang kasuhan ng KRIMINAL yung nag-issue ng check. May kulong kasi pag talbog na cheke, kaya mas madaling maningil).

 

If you want, you can state in the Lease Contract that payments will be made by check issued by the father of the tenant.

Thank you sir. One last question, your reply took care of, in case, his father's checks bounced, but what about eviction? Kapag hindi na nakakapagbayad, bp22 will be used but will there be any legal problem or hindrance for evicting the son since he solely signed as the lessee but the checks are from his father and we put a clause in the contract that the checks of the father will be used?

Link to comment

Thank you sir. One last question, your reply took care of, in case, his father's checks bounced, but what about eviction? Kapag hindi na nakakapagbayad, bp22 will be used but will there be any legal problem or hindrance for evicting the son since he solely signed as the lessee but the checks are from his father and we put a clause in the contract that the checks of the father will be used?

shouldn't be a problem. even if the checks are issued by his father, eviction for nonpayment would require that the tenant prove he has paid the rentals. Ano ang proof niya na nagbayad na siya? Since talbog yung cheke, he has no proof of payment, unless he pays the rent himself (which would then solve the problem).

 

In fine, OK lang yung checks issued by the father as payment, if the checks bounce, you can opt to file an eviction case, as well as for BP22.

Edited by rocco69
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...