Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

The Art of War


Recommended Posts

Robert Greene's 33 Strategies of War make it appear that Sun Tzu's Art of War is just a small fragment of available strategies in dealing with conflict . . .

 

Very interesting reading, if you're willing to plunck 899 pesos for a copy . . .

 

Saw Both Books and both seem to be interesting though I was leaning towards the Graphical Version of Sun Tzu's Art of War pero nakalimutan ko lang sino nag-Foreword nun.

Link to comment
  • 5 weeks later...

the battle takes place in ancient rome

 

and yes you are correct, just the fact that it takes place in the ancient world negates a lot of the inherent advantages that a modern army has. No satellite coverage, no GPS, no supply lines. Absolutely no chance of re-supply. Maintenance for the equipment will also be an issue, a lot of the high-tech equipment requires frequent routine maintenance, such as the choppers. Aside from the fuel, it needs hydraulic fluid, oil and all that stuff, which will be limited by the fact that they only have what is on hand.

 

so it's not as clear cut as you guys may think :-)

 

 

 

this goes to the romans, 9 times out of 10.

 

Although the modern soldier might have advantages in conditioning and better nutrition and prior knowledge of the enemies tactics. Romans have been doing this kind of fighting for decades. they are a perfectly tuned machine, and while the modern army may know how romans do things, it's a world of difference between knowing and actually training and applying these tactics to the point of perfection.

 

Styles make fights, and in this particular one it favors those who have actually fought in ancient style fighting.

Also, add the fact of era and mindset.

The modern soldier doesn't expect to die or to see death up close.

 

A seasoned Roman soldier is accustomed to death looming over him, so he is likely to have more resolve. (More likely not guaranteed)

 

With that in mind, I would say that a U.S. Special forces and any Special Forces vs elite forces any era would be a fair fight hand to hand if we ignore terrain and tactics sice it's just might against might.

 

The modern Western Special Forces soldier is more of a tactical package that is trained in war, destabilization, and sabotage (much like Sun Tzu's favorite: spies). An ancient elite soldier is trained only to fight because the old paradigm was largely force versus force.

 

While the U.S. likely has the most powerful and well provisioned army, experience also tells us that size creates oversights, such as the mistakes in the Vietnam war of failing to adapt to the enemy's tactics and not identifying the enemy's win condition.

 

This goes back to war being about breaking the enemy's will to fight, either directly to the warriors or indirectly through the citizens and statesmen.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 years later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...