samahang alternick Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 It is going to be a matter of evidence. If the relatives can prove that they are partners in the business, rather than mere employees, they would be entitled to a share. Mahihirapan nga lang silang patunayan ito dahil, ayon sa iyo, wala namang papers na pinirmahan, pagkatapos tumatanggap sila ng compensation. Ang partner ay tumatanggap ng share ng profits, hindi ng sweldo (unless he is paid additional compensation, aside from the profits). +1 Quote Link to comment
jekeice Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Sir rocco69 and samahang alternick, thank you very much. Quote Link to comment
Ladykiller09 Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 if a married couple does not cohabitates with each other for 10 years does this ground for annulment or void of marriage? Quote Link to comment
hero-uy Posted October 11, 2014 Share Posted October 11, 2014 Pwede ba gawing ground for annulment pag nag ka anak na yung babae sa ibang lalake? Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Yung hindi lang pagsasama ng sampung taon ay hindi ground for nullity of marriage (hindi talaga ito ground for annulment).pero, maaari itong gawing basehan para sabihin na "psychologically incapacitated" ang isa sa kanila (o sila pareho). Bale, psychological incapacity ang basehan para ipa-deklara ang kasal na walang bisa (kailangan mo ng psychologist o psychiatrist na mag-uugnay ng di nila pagsasama sa isang psychological disorder). if a married couple does not cohabitates with each other for 10 years does this ground for annulment or void of marriage? Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Yung pagkakarun ng anak ng babae sa iba ay hindi ground for annulment of marriage.pero, maaari itong gawing basehan para sabihin na "psychologically incapacitated" si babae. Bale, psychological incapacity ang basehan pra ipa-deklara ang kasal na walang bisa (kailangan mo ng psychologist o psychiatrist na mag-uugnay ng pagkakaroon ng iba ni babae sa isang psychological disorder). Pwede ba gawing ground for annulment pag nag ka anak na yung babae sa ibang lalake? Quote Link to comment
pussywagon Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 Yung pagkakarun ng anak ng babae sa iba ay hindi ground for annulment of marriage.pero, maaari itong gawing basehan para sabihin na "psychologically incapacitated" si babae. Bale, psychological incapacity ang basehan pra ipa-deklara ang kasal na walang bisa (kailangan mo ng psychologist o psychiatrist na mag-uugnay ng pagkakaroon ng iba ni babae sa isang psychological disorder). Can this (wife pregnant to another man other than husband) serve as a ground to file a case against the other guy? Quote Link to comment
g0ps Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 You can file a criminal case for adultery against the wife, which would also include the other guy in the charge. Quote Link to comment
g0ps Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 But for the declaration of nullity of marriage, that's a bit far fetch. It will depend on the ingenuity of your lawyer to establish that "having another man" constitutes psychological incapacity on the part of wife. You would also be needing a good report from a psychologists. With that said, let's be realistic.. if you pay the right price to the right people, (you know what i'm saying? ) you will most likely get your nullity in about a year's time. Quote Link to comment
g0ps Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 If your wife gets pregnant by another guy, that is not a ground for annulment or nullity of marriage. That is however a strong evidence for adultery. Quote Link to comment
glut_func Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 correct me if I'm wrong pero mananalo lang naman ang mga annulment cases dito sa pinas pag malakas ang ebidensya mo OR marami lang pera yung nag file, tama ba ko? other than that, madalas nauuwi na lang sa areglo. Quote Link to comment
g0ps Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Evidence would always be the same. That which would prove the "psychological incapacity" of either of the spouses. It really depends on the presentation or narration in the petition and testimony tending to prove the same. Otherwise, you will be needing budget for the judge. Quote Link to comment
Ladykiller09 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Good day mga sir, maitanong how about you acquired assets during your separation with your ex wife masasabi ba natin still a conjugal property.... Me habol pa din ba sya? Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 (edited) how about you acquired assets during your separation with your ex wife masasabi ba natin still a conjugal property.... Me habol pa din ba sya? Kung ang ibig mong sabihin sa salitang "ex-wife" ay ito ay naging "ex" mo dahil may desisyon na ang korte na pinapawalang bisa ang kasal ninyo, isa sa mga epekto ng desisyon ng korte ay ang paglusaw ng community property/conjugal property ng mag-asawa, kung kaya't lahat ng ari-arian na maipupundar mo pagkatapos ng desisyon ng korte ay sa iyo lang. pero, kung ang ibig mong sabihin sa salitang "ex-wife" ay ito ay naging "ex" mo dahil kayo ay naghiwalay lamang (ang tawag dito sa batas ay separation de facto), ayon sa Art. 100 ng Family Code: Art. 100. The separation in fact between husband and wife shall not affect the regime of absolute community except that:(1) The spouse who leaves the conjugal home or refuses to live therein, without just cause, shall not have the right to be supported;(2) When the consent of one spouse to any transaction of the other is required by law, judicial authorization shall be obtained in a summary proceeding;(3) In the absence of sufficient community property, the separate property of both spouses shall be solidarily liable for the support of the family. The spouse present shall, upon proper petition in a summary proceeding, be given judicial authority to administer or encumber any specific separate property of the other spouse and use the fruits or proceeds thereof to satisfy the latter's share. (178a) Lumalabas, walang epekto ang basta-basta lang na paghihiwalay, kung kaya't lahat ng maipupundar mo sa panahong kayo ay nagkahiwalay ay pag-aari nyo pa ring pareho, at may habol ang "ex wife" mo (na hindi naman talaga natin matatatatwag na "ex wife" mo dahil kasal pa rin kayo sa isa't-isa). Edited January 13, 2015 by rocco69 Quote Link to comment
Ladykiller09 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 S rocco maraming salamat po Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.