Shake & Bake Dynasty League

[kingsville]

I honestly cant understand why it is difficult to follow the 100 game rule. You simply click the player's name and the career button and you already have the number of games he has played. Two clicks. One pa nga ata kasi sa player page, andun na rin yung number of career games. One click. And it is still difficult?

 

I can do this for my own team.. but to check this for all the teams? Nope. Sorry.. ganun din ako ka-tamad.

Pero i would appreciate if there will be whistleblowers around.

 

Looks like more GMs are opposed to the proposal for a rule change. SIge lang po, keep them coming and we shall keep the current rule in place.

[Jongkers]

Just like in last season's playoffs, maximum roster moves reset to ten.

 

Good luck, everyone!

[gherome]

@commish KVille. yeaps.the support would always be there. but as master AJB has pointed out, it shouldn't be much of burden for a gm to note that if the player you'd want to add is a rook (or a soph), then just click the player profile's link to check if he's already eligible to be picked up (100-game rule)

 

These current rules do make more sense and would work if we want 'em to work Hence I vote that we keep the current rules as it is.

[blankface]

I know im guilty of missing out the 100 game rules (sorry to the owner of Tyler) but i would prefer this to be the same rule next year. Like what AJB said, madali lang sundan yun 100 game rule . I am also okay with the bracketing...makes it more exciting for the k players...how about 8 only?

[Ankiseth]

tyler's mine. no worries.

 

i do support the suggestion to reduce k players to 8.

[gherome]

what's the premise behind the vote to only have K8?

[ayasadai]

@kv, madali lang naman bro coz everytime someone picks up a player 'owned' by other GM... sigurado naman that the owner will speak up (unless inactive)

 

so for the 2 jabronis, i suggest we also keep the current rule....

Edited March 22, 2011 by ayasadai

[blankface]

8 kasi para mas maganda ang selection sa FA pool to give chance to those who do not have a strong team to start with. Pag 2 lang kasi yun natatangal parang same team pa din yun ng current team so parang yun mga malalakas malakas pa din(unless matatanda na yun team members). Just my opinion but if you don't like okay lang.

[Labuyo]

i'm cool with K8.

 

leaning against the 100game rule for rookies. though not as fervently as those in favor of keeping it.

[dencio]

Not to sound too contrarian with the suggested rules changes but I don't agree with K8. What if after this change the good teams remain good, K6 naman ang kasunod?

 

Ang understanding ko kasi sa dynasty league is to build a team as strong a team as possible over time. Or am I taking "dynasty" too literally?

[Ankiseth]

Being near on the bottom for the last few years - k10 has been hard. Walang chance to improve your team. But then its really like the NBA.

 

I did pick the worst set of players for keepers- brand / murphy / Redd.

[AJBredux]

Im for K8 and for the 100-game rule.

 

I won the first season, bombed out on the 2nd season, near the top this season (but about to bomb out again since Deron has abandoned me). I have a solid core of players and having a K10 would be to to my advantage. But since I want better competition and I have been advocating for a K8 in the main dynasty league for a couple of years now (to no avail), I cannot say now that I am against it.

[Jongkers]

I'm for K8 and the 100-game limit but this should be implemented NOT next season.

Sa 2012-13 pa.

[blankface]

I am for K8 and 100 game limit for rookies...also, pwede na din siya next season mala stern ang dating immediate lagi ang change :)I have the same experience with AJB, my team was strong during the first season (kalaban ko si AJB), then semplang sa next round..then oks ulit this year...still maybe ok next year...

[Jongkers]

Not next season.

Kawawa naman yung teams who made player moves this season thinking that they can keep them for next season.

Medyo unfair yun.