Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Shake & Bake Dynasty League


Jongkers

Recommended Posts

Divisions, anyone? :unsure:

 

This has been brought up last year and the majority of the replies was "I'll go with what the majority says." :lol:

Kung wala namang violent objections, I'll didvide the teams into two divisions.

Last year's regular season finish ang standings.

Or use a website for it.

 

For this season, the theme for the divisions is The Madrigals: Ehra v. :wub: Michelle :wub: .

Pag may humirit ng Jamby, walang rookie pick next season. :lol:

Link to comment

Divisions, anyone? :unsure:

 

This has been brought up last year and the majority of the replies was "I'll go with what the majority says." :lol:

Kung wala namang violent objections, I'll didvide the teams into two divisions.

Last year's regular season finish ang standings.

Or use a website for it.

 

For this season, the theme for the divisions is The Madrigals: Ehra v. :wub: Michelle :wub: .

Pag may humirit ng Jamby, walang rookie pick next season. :lol:

 

so parang mukha vs dodo ang pagpipilian? :lol:

 

EDIT: and i'm perfectly fine w/having divisions (mainly because i don't know enough to any valid opinion on the matter) except that i'm going for tits as well! :P

Edited by Labuyo
Link to comment

quoting doc's post....

 

 

btw, my 'YES' vote on extending ownership rights for rooks...

 

it's just that for 2nd rounders especially, they tend to become disposable assets around the time rights on them expire. the sad part here is that a good chunk of them don't even get enough playing time to show us what they're capable of and whether they have a shot at making it in the league.

 

now, if only the league did a better job at developing players, the rule would make absolutely perfect sense. but as it stands, teams have their own motivations and goals and all that so player development takes longer than it really should.

 

that said, I think what we could do instead of a time-based cap is a game-based one like how we do for baseball.

 

Say we see rookie X play 40 games and rookie Y play 60 games...disregarding the level of play altogether, in theory, we're supposed to 'know' more about rookie Y than rookie X and in effect, have a better grasp on whether he's a keeper player or not.

 

standard cut-off would be 100 games for all players---both 1st and 2nd rounders. we keep all the guys for a little over a year and by game 100, make the decision whether or not he's worthy a roster spot, is an underrated asset or should be headed for Europe. of course, teams can cut guys anytime if they feel like it too as per existing rules.

 

just my 2 cents.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...