Jongkers Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 k-villeRe MLP... it's about fuc king time!!Last week pa dapat e. Ang gulo lang talaga ni Wedgie! Sana lang maayos ang bata dahil my team now has a hole in LF after the Crawford deal. And then I'm all set! :goatee: Quote Link to comment
TripleDouble Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 me pat the bat ka naman master J ah? good enough as an LF... Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 me pat the bat ka naman master J ah? good enough as an LF... He isn't hitting as well as expected at Tropicana e.I hope he turns it around soon. Quote Link to comment
kingsville Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 k-villeRe MLP... it's about fuc king time!!Last week pa dapat e. Ang gulo lang talaga ni Wedgie! Sana lang maayos ang bata dahil my team now has a hole in LF after the Crawford deal. And then I'm all set! :goatee:pakisabihan na lang po yung franchise closer ninyo..nagiging cute kasi sina s-shields and arredondo by the day eh.thanks.. - kville (for my main league team ) me pat the bat ka naman master J ah? good enough as an LF...+1 btw, im just getting a sneak preview of what the H4DH team can dish out..how about 12 HR's and we haven't played the weekend games! Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 Yep... I have a serious closer situation. Parang by ASB, wala na sa closing job ang closers ko. Quote Link to comment
TripleDouble Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 closers? what closers? do we need any? Quote Link to comment
cheeselogger Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 cheese i have an offer for lind...counter to your liking... Orlando Hudson and Connor Jackson for Adam Lind... not really sure why I'm going to decline though, IMHO, you're overpaying for a hot bat. Jackson, again IMHO, isn't any different/upgrade to my recent pickup Feliz and Hudson won't be able to crack my squad with Uggla occupying that position... with that, I suggest we get a 3rd party so we could all get what we want... Quote Link to comment
consiglieri Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 you want burell... hey jongks...hudson goes to you lind to me and burrell to cheese would that work Quote Link to comment
gift_of_game Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 walangjoe naman, sana nag-trade nalang kami ni snitch para hindi na nagamit yung waiver claim...tsktsk Quote Link to comment
cheeselogger Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 not interested in Burrell. I'd be better off keeping the hot Lind bat than Pat... Quote Link to comment
consiglieri Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 hehehe...anything in mind cheese? Quote Link to comment
agentjackbauer Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 1. Yeah, it was my opinion that Josh's opinion was wrong. I am entitled to my opinion right? In the same way that Josh is entitled to his. And if he thinks I am wrong, Im fine with it. (And by the way, it turns out Josh was arguing on the wrong premise. You know why? He thought Hanley was being traded for Fielder (and not Howard). He said so himself but then he edited his post) No, I am not telling everybody that they can never say a trade is lopsided. Why would I say something as stupid as that? And c'mon, cant you do better than put words into my mouth? I'd be the first guy to say if a trade is lopsided. And I believe you have first-hand experience as to how vocal I can be if and when a lopsided trade happens. 2. Why the strong urge for me to defend the trade? Huh? Now I should I apologize for being vocal? Does it offend your sensibilities? Eh sa wala akong magawa ng araw na yun eh at trip ko magsulat. Bakit, bawal ba?Ang pwede lang ba magsalita tungkol sa isang trade ay yung mga managers na kasali sa trade? Last time I checked, trades are submitted to the league precisely because the approval or disapproval of each manager is required. Oh by the way, why the strong urge to highlight my defense of that trade when everbody else was arguing on its substantive merits and not focusing on the ones arguing for or against it? Still smarting about something? 1. You were vehemently pointing out otherwise why josh's opinion was "wrong". Now, isn't that almost having the same effect as just telling everybody they can never say it is lopsided? 2. Yup, never said you shouldn't say what you think about the trade. I was just asking why the strong urge to defend the trade when you're not even part of it? I was just curious, for a second there while totally defending the trade I thought you were one of the two involved parties in the trade... Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 (edited) @consigI'm open to the three-way although I'm not sure if I have any piece that cheese would like. Edited May 2, 2009 by Jongkers Quote Link to comment
joshiasi Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 @consigI'm open to the three-way although I'm not sure if I have any piece that cheese would like. three way daw :evil: Quote Link to comment
Jongkers Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 Err.. not that way, josh! :sick: Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.