RER Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 haha. patawa ka naman.. eh isa nga sa mga underrated players si paul pierce. and how can you say overrated ung mama eh siya ung leader ng one of the top teams sa league. funniest joke ever :lol: Quote Link to comment
Malisyoso1980 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 nope Pierce aint overrated...he wont come to the status of LBJ ...true.but he stuck with one team (win or beat)...he never demand a price like the former...he's consistent numbers wise... they aint awesome...but i guess stats are for geekswho privy themselves on the net for data instead of thinking of ways to score on chicks ... and its OK to boast of something on tweeter ...especially if you win. My overrated NBA player- Agent Zero Quote Link to comment
bagongmember Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 rashard lewis specially in terms of salary ngayong season si anthony morrow at si amare Quote Link to comment
Nathan M. York Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 (edited) ^^ Sir Nathan, thank you for such enlightening yet empty responses. It's obvious that your views are colored by some bias against the man. So I'll stop here. And, by the way, before you give advice on looking up something on the internet, why don't you try it yourself. Specifically, look at the Awards section and All-NBA teams. Touche' Sir . . . It is also quire obvious that you are a Celtic fan, or horrors of horror, a PP follower. But let me enlightnen you further. For the ALL NBA TEAM, you must be referring to PP having been named to the ALL NBA 2ND TEAM in 2009 and his being 3 time ALL NBA 3RD TEAM (in 2002, 2003 & 2008), while I was referring to the ALL NBA FIRST TEAM or more commonly known as the ALL NBA TEAM. PP was NEVER named in the ALL NBA FIRST TEAM if you will, only 2nd and 3rd, and will never get past those ranks. And add to that, in the 2010 rankings of current small forwards which is his natural position, PP is ranked only 7th, and players like Danny Granger, Andre Igoudala and even Gerald Wallace outrank him, not to mention Carmelo Anthony, KD of Oklahoma and of course, LBJ. He claims to be superstar yet Gerald Wallace is better in terms of overall statistics? Naman! As for the other accolades of PP, it only proves my saying that he is one-dimensional player as his claim to fame is only scoring records with one exception, his Boston franchise record of 9 steals in one game in 1999 vs Miami Heat, although he shares this record with the great Larry Bird. So what awards are you talking about? His 3-point shooting championship in the 2010 All Star game? Oh puleeezzz?!!! And the awards you are raving about are also the basis for my contention that PP is indeed an overrated superstar. Perhaps by now Sir you, together with Sir Buwitre, can already distinguish the meaning of OVERRATED and UNDERRATED. If you still can't get it, I'd be happy to oblige you with some pointers. Better luck next time Sir. Edited November 19, 2010 by Nathan M. York 1 Quote Link to comment
Guest eljuego Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 PP led Boston to the Eastern Conference Finals in 2002 and he was Boston's main man then. Quote Link to comment
Nathan M. York Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 PP led Boston to the Eastern Conference Finals in 2002 and he was Boston's main man then. Oh yes Sir but that was a fluke more than anything else. And he teamed up with Antoine Walker then, with PP averaging 26.1 pts per game while AW was at 22.1 ppg. And after that, Boston went on downward spiral season after season until the arrival of KG and Ray Allen. "The Truth" cant handle it alone. Quote Link to comment
Ja_07 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 OVERRATED = The Cheat 3 UNDERRATED = Monta Ellis = Joe Johnson = Gerald Wallace = R. Westbrook PP = Fail Quote Link to comment
RER Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 (edited) Oh yes Sir but that was a fluke more than anything else. And he teamed up with Antoine Walker then, with PP averaging 26.1 pts per game while AW was at 22.1 ppg. And after that, Boston went on downward spiral season after season until the arrival of KG and Ray Allen. "The Truth" cant handle it alone. the truth PP didnt single handledly bring the boston in playoffs during 2002. A. Walker who average more than 20pts per game . Imagine ang hina ng Eastern Conference team nun, kaya sure na papasok sa play offs ang Celtics.from 2000-2010 3times lang nagchampion ang eatern conf. team only new jersey been able to record back to back championship apperance. back to PP. There is not legitimate title contender sa eastern conference. But given a talented players sa Celtics then cant even manage to win in conference finals. Then NJ badly lost to Lakers. Edited November 19, 2010 by RER Quote Link to comment
RER Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 OVERRATED = The Cheat 3 UNDERRATED = Monta Ellis = Joe Johnson = Gerald Wallace = R. Westbrook PP = Fail^^^ yes underrated si joe johnson. Dahil nung 2002 binangko sya ng celtics Quote Link to comment
Guest eljuego Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 Oh yes Sir but that was a fluke more than anything else. And he teamed up with Antoine Walker then, with PP averaging 26.1 pts per game while AW was at 22.1 ppg. And after that, Boston went on downward spiral season after season until the arrival of KG and Ray Allen. "The Truth" cant handle it alone. A fluke? Haha! What made you say that it was a fluke? Quote Link to comment
Nathan M. York Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 A fluke? Haha! What made you say that it was a fluke? Have you not read the answer of Mr. RER Sir? If not, we will reiterate - that 2002 season was one of the worst for the Eastern Conference. If you look at the teams who made playoffs, they were so bad that the finalist New Jersey, was swept by the LA Lakers 4-0. So bad that only two teams were able to register 50+ wins, the NJ Nets (52-30) and the Detroit Pistons (50-32). Boston returned to playoffs for the first time since 1995 but after this season but afterwards, it never contended again until 2008. That Sir, is the meaning of fluke.Still don't get it Sir? Quote Link to comment
Guest eljuego Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 If not, we will reiterate - that 2002 season was one of the worst for the Eastern Conference. If you look at the teams who made playoffs, they were so bad that the finalist New Jersey, was swept by the LA Lakers 4-0. So bad that only two teams were able to register 50+ wins, the NJ Nets (52-30) and the Detroit Pistons (50-32). Boston returned to playoffs for the first time since 1995 but after this season but afterwards, it never contended again until 2008. That Sir, is the meaning of fluke.You're calling that feat a fluke? They beat the Detroit Pistons which had the homecourt advantage in 5 games in the Eastern semis. The Cs won 2 games at Auburn Hills and you call that a fluke. Do you have to depend on RER's assessment and not your own? You don't call that a fluke. You call that Celtic mystique. But hey, everybody is entitled to his opinon. If you think it's a fluke, you can believe it even if your opinion is colored with an obvious bias against Pierce. My only post was Pierce led the Cs to the 2002 Eastern Conference Finals as the main man. So what if Antoine Walker was there? Was he the main man? You just can't handle the truth. Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 You're calling that feat a fluke? They beat the Detroit Pistons which had the homecourt advantage in 5 games in the Eastern semis. The Cs won 2 games at Auburn Hills and you call that a fluke. Do you have to depend on RER's assessment and not your own? You don't call that a fluke. You call that Celtic mystique. But hey, everybody is entitled to his opinon. If you think it's a fluke, you can believe it even if your opinion is colored with an obvious bias against Pierce. My only post was Pierce led the Cs to the 2002 Eastern Conference Finals as the main man. So what if Antoine Walker was there? Was he the main man? You just can't handle the truth. i agree. that was not a fluke. parang yung orlando magic yan nung tinalo nila yung defending champs in 2009. they won 2 times in boston. Quote Link to comment
Guest eljuego Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 Nope. That one was a perfect example of a fluke. No KG yet the Magic took 7 games to beat the Cs. In the rematch last year with KG.....do I need to say it and rub salt on your wound? Ok I'll be euphemistic. No KG was a valid reason. Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 (edited) Nope. That one was a perfect example of a fluke. No KG yet the Magic took 7 games to beat the Cs. In the rematch last year with KG.....do I need to say it and rub salt on your wound? Ok I'll be euphemistic. No KG was a valid reason. just as expected. your position is always pag panalo ang celtics, hindi fluke. pagtalo ang celtics, fluke. if you really are aware of what happened, last season was a fluke for the celtics because shard was sick and forcing himself. that is a valid reason. Edited November 20, 2010 by jopoc Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.